Nøgleord
Review
Naturfag
Citation/Eksport
Resumé
Dette review fokuserer på nyere forståelser af literacy i naturfag. Reviewet baserer sig på et bredt tekstbegreb omfattende multimodale repræsentationsformer, som sætter en elev i stand til at læse og producere tekster, der er relevante og meningsfulde i en naturfaglig undervisningspraksis i grundskolen. Gennemgangen af studierne i reviewet afdækker overordnet tre interessante pointer: Der er i forskningen stort fokus på traditionelle literacyaktiviteter i form af læsning og produktion af verbalsproglig tekst, naturfagslærere ser ikke sig selv som sproglærere, og der er behov for at udvikle et literacyrelateret begrebshierarki i naturfagsdidaktik, som knytter an til både fagspecifik literacy og naturfaglige modeller og naturfaglig modellering.
Referencer
Ainsworth, S. & Newton, L. (2014). Teaching and researching visual representations: Shared vision or divided worlds? I: B. Eilam & J. Gilbert (red.), Science teachers’ use of visual representations (s. 29-49). Springer International Publishing.
Ariely, M., Livnat, Z. & Yarden, A. (2019). Analyzing the language of an adapted primary literature article. Science & Education, 28, 63-85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-019-00033-5
Arksey, H. & O’Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Metodology, 8(1), 19-32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616
Arnbak, E. (2003). Faglig læsning – fra læseproces til læreproces. Gyldendal.
Baker, L. (2008). Metacognition in comprehension instruction: What we’ve learned since NRP. I: C.C. Block & S.R. Parris (red.), Comprehension instruction: Research-based best practice. The Guilford Press.
Bjørkvold, T. & Blikstad-Balas, M. (2018). Students as researchers: What and why seventh-grade students choose to write when investigating their own research question. Science Education, 102(2), 304-341. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21324
Bremholm, J. (2014). Veje og vildveje til læsning som ressource: Teksthændelser i naturfagsundervisning med og uden læseguide – et interventionsstudie om literacy i naturfag i udskolingen. Ph.d.-afhandling. Aarhus Universitet. https://www.ucviden.dk/ws/portalfiles/portal/103155630/J_Bremholm_PhD_afhandling_final.pdf
Bremholm, J. (2016). Læringsmål i literacyperspektiv – en replik til artiklerne af I. Carlgren og P. Hobel. CURSIV, 19, 159-174. https://edu.au.dk/fileadmin/edu/Cursiv/CURSIV_19_www.pdf
Bremholm, J. (2020). Literacy – hvad betyder det egentlig, og hvad kan vi bruge det til? I: K. Friis & D. Østergren-Olsen (red.), Literacydidaktik i fagene i udskolingen (s. 31-44). Dafolo.
Bremholm, J., Sillasen, M.K., Buch, B. & Puch, M. (2023). Naturfagenes læremidler – kortlægning af læremiddelbrug i naturfag i den danske grundskole. Nationalt Videncenter for Læsning og Naturfagsakademiet (NAFA). https://videnomlaesning.dk/media/5687/hovedrapport_naturfagenes-laeremidler-final.pdf
Bursjöö, I. (2022). Multimodality in the teaching of biology: Comparing some semiotic resources. NorDiNa, 18(2), 243-253. https://doi.org/10.5617/nordina.9822
Cardullo, V., Zygouris-Coe, V.I. & Wilson, N.S. (2017). Reading nonfiction text on an iPad in a secondary classroom. Journal of Research in Reading, 40(S1), 190-208. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12099
Cazden, C., Cope, B., Fairclough, N., Gee, J.P., Kalantzis, M., Kress, G., Luke, A., Luke, C., Michaels, S. & Nakata, M. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 60-92. https://newarcproject.pbworks.com/f/Pedagogy+of+Multiliteracies_New+London+Group.pdf
Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory (2. udg.). Sage Publications.
Christiansen, J.L. (2020). Modeller og modellering i grundskolens naturfag. MONA, 2020(3), 7-26. https://tidsskrift.dk/mona/article/view/121566/168931
Clark, S.K., Lott, K., Larese-Casanova, M., Taggart, A.M. & Judd, E. (2021). Leveraging integrated science and disciplinary literacy instruction to teach first graders to write like scientists and to explore their perceptions of scientists. Research in Science Education, 51, 1153-1175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-020-09927-9
Clark, S.K., Smith, L.K., Judd, E. & Rosdahl, V. (2021). Using disciplinary literacy to teach children to write science informal text. Reading Psychology, 42(5), 455-483. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2021.1888353
Conley, M.W. (2009). Improving adolescent comprehension: Developing comprehension strategies in the content areas. I: S.E. Israel & G.G. Duffy (red.), Handbook of research on reading comprehension, 531-550. Routledge.
Danielsson, K. (2016). Modes and meaning in the classroom: The role of different semiotic resources to convey meaning in science classrooms. Linguistics and Education, 35, 88-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2016.07.005
Dooley, C.M., Ellison, T.L., Welch, M.M., Allen, M. & Bauer, D. (2016). Digital participatory pedagogy: Digital participation as a method for technology integration in curriculum. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 32(2), 52-62. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2016.1138912
Erwin, R.W. (2015). Data-literacy: Real-world learning through problem-solving with data sets. American Secondary Education, 43(2), 18-26. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43694208
Esperat, T.M.K. & Loftis, T.M. (2021). Using new literacies to foster student motivation. Literacy Practice and Research, 46(1), artikel 5. https://doi.org/10.25148/lpr.009339
Fang, Z., Adams, B., Gresser, V.T. & Li, C. (2019). Developing critical literacy in science through an SFL-informed pedagogical heuristic. English Teaching: Practice & Critique, 18(1), 4-17. https://doi.org/10.1108/ETPC-01-2018-0009
Fang, Z. & Patrick, J.D. (2024). Disciplinary literacy. The CEEDAR Center, University of Florida. http://ceedar.education.ufl.edu/tools/innovation-configurations
Fenwick, L. & Herrington, M. (2022). Teacher use of genre pedagogy: Engaging students in dialogue about content area language during text deconstruction. Language and Education, 36(1), 43-58. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2021.1912082
Grysko, R.A. & Zygouris-Coe, V.I. (2020). Supporting disciplinary literacy and science learning in grades 3-5. The Reading Teacher, 73(4), 485-499. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1860
Guo, D., Wright, K.L. & McTigue, E.M. (2018). A content analysis of visuals in elementary school textbooks. The Elementary School Journal, 119(2), 244-269. https://doi.org/10.1086/700266
Halliday, M.A.K. (1978). Language as social semiotic. Edward Arnold.
Halliday, M.A.K. & Matthiessen, C. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar. Arnold.
Hannant, K. & Jetnikoff, A. (2017). What do students need to know about writing for science in the middle years? Literacy Learning: The Middle Years, 25(1), 53-65. https://search.informit.org/doi/epdf/10.3316/informit.596887045510776
Herber, H.L. (1970). Teaching reading in content areas. Prentice-Hall. Hsu, H.-Y., Wang, S.-K. & Coster, D. (2017). New literacy implementation: The impact of professional development on middle school student science learning. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education, 13(3), 53-72. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJICTE.2017070105
Hurley, B.P. & Henry, M.P. (2015). Using a disciplinary literacy framework to teach high school physics: An action research study. i.e.: inquiry in education, 7(1), artikel 3. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1171754.pdf
Javeed, L. (2019). Motion, matter, force, and writing??? Creating space for writing in a secondary physics classroom. The Language and Literacy Spectrum, 29(1), artikel 2. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1263116.pdf
Jewitt, C. (2008). Multimodality and literacy in school classrooms. Review of Research in Education, 32(1), 241-267. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X07310586
Johnson, L., McHugh, S., Eagle, J.L. & Spires, H.A. (2019). Project-based inquiry (PBI) global in kindergarten classroom: Inquiring about the world. Early Childhood Education Journal, 47, 607-613. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-019-00946-4
Kelly, G.J. (2007). Discourse in science classrooms. I: S.K. Abell & N.G. Lederman (red.), Handbook of research on science education (s. 443-469). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Kress, G., Jewitt, C., Ogborn, J. & Tsatsarelis, C. (2001). Multimodal teaching and learning: The rhetorics of the science classroom. Continuum.
Kucer, S.B. (2017). The monitoring and responding behaviours of proficient fourth grade readers to miscues on a complex scientific text. Literacy, 51(3), 154-161. https://doi.org/10.1111/lit.12116
Kumpulainen, K., Byman, J., Renlund, J. & Wong, C.C. (2020). Children’s augmented storying in, with and for nature. Education Sciences, 10(6), 149. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10060149
Lammert, C. & Riordan, E. (2019). “She’s not going to tell you what to ask”: Three Strategies for Writing in Science. The Reading Teacher, 73(3), 367-373. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1824
Lankshear, C. & Knobel, M. (2011). New literacies: Everyday practices and social learning (3. udg.). Open University Press.
Lemke, J.L. (1998). Multiplying meaning: Visual and verbal semiotics in scientific text. I: J. Martin & R. Veel (red.), Reading science (s. 87-113). Routledge.
Moje, E.B. (2008). Foregrounding the disciplines in secondary literacy teaching and learning: A call for change. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 52(2), 96-107. https://doi.org/10.1598/JAAL.52.2.1
Moje, E.B. (2015). Doing and teaching disciplinary literacy with adolescent learners: A social and cultural enterprise. Harvard Educational Review, 85(2), 254-278. https://doi.org/10.17763/0017-8055.85.2.254
Moje, E.B., Collazo, T., Carrillo, R. & Marx, R.W. (2001). “Maestro, what is’ quality’?”: Language, literacy, and discourse in project-based science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(4), 469-498. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.1014
Mork, S. & Erlien, W. (2017). Språk, tekst og kommunikasjon i naturfag (2. udg.). Universitetsforlaget, Oslo.
Munn, Z., Peters, M.D.J., Stern, C., Tufanaru, C., McArthur, A. & Aromataris, E. (2018). Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18, 143. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x
O’Brien, D.G., Stewart, R.A. & Moje, E.B. (1995). Why content literacy is difficult to infuse into the secondary school: Complexities of curriculum, pedagogy, and school culture. Reading Research Quarterly, 30(3), 442-463. https://doi.org/10.2307/747625
OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 assessment and analytical framework. PISA, OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/b25efab8-en
Paugh, P. & Wendell, K. (2021). Disciplinary literacy in STEM: A functional approach. Journal of Literacy Research, 53(1), 122-144. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296X20986905
Prain, V., Tytler, R. & Peterson, S. (2009). Multiple representation in learning about evaporation. International Journal of Science Education, 31(6), 787-808. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701824249
Pratt, S.M. & Colemann, J.M. (2020). Using epistemic network analysis to visually map a metacognitive continuum of urban fourth grader’s strategies for navigating multimodal science texts. The Elementary School Journal, 121(2), 224-255. https://doi.org/10.1086/711296
Putra, G.B.S. & Tang, K.S. (2016). Disciplinary literacy instructions on writing scientific explanations: A case study from a chemistry classroom in an all-girls school. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 17, 569-579. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RP00022C
Rainey, E.C., Maher, B.L., Coupland, D., Franchi, R. & Moje, E.B. (2018). But what does it look like? Illustrations of disciplinary literacy teaching in two content areas. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 61(4), 371-379. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.669
Rambøll og Københavns Professionshøjskole. (2019). Undersøgelse af kompetencebehov blandt naturfagslærere i grundskolen. https://www.uvm.dk/-/media/filer/uvm/publikationer/2019/dec/191203-undersogelse-af-kompetencebehov-blandt-naturfagslaerere-i-grundskolen.pdf
Rinehart, R. (2020). They really used to think that? The Science Teacher, 88(1), 37-45. https://doi.org/10.1080/00368555.2020.12293555
Ringnes, V. & Hannisdal, M. (2006). Kjemi Fagdidaktikk – kjemi i skolen. Høyskoleforlaget.
Sillasen, M.K. (2014). Forandringsprocesser i netværk af sociale naturfaglige praksisser – en sociokulturel-politisk analyse af natur/teknik-læreres professionelle udvikling i uddannelsesreformer. Ph.d.-afhandling, Aalborg Universitet. https://vbn.aau.dk/ws/portalfiles/portal/549436264/Martin_Krabbe_Sillasen_PhD_afhandling_17_24.pdf
Shanahan, T. & Shanahan, C. (2008). Teaching disciplinary literacy to adolescents: Rethinking content-area literacy. Harvard Educational Review, 78(1), 40-59. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.78.1.v62444321p602101
Shanahan, T. & Shanahan, C. (2012). What is disciplinary literacy and why does it matter? Topics in Language Disorders, 32(1), 7-18. https://doi.org/10.1097/TLD.0b013e318244557a
Skjelbred, D. & Veum, A. (2013). Literacy i læringskontekster. I: D. Skjelbred & A. Veum (red.), Literacy i læringskontekster. Cappelen Damm Akademisk.
Sørvik, O.S., Blikstad-Balas, M. & Ødegaard, M. (2015). “Do books like these have authors?” New roles for text and new demands on students in integrated science-literacy instruction. Science Education, 99(1), 39-69. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21143
Tang, K.S. (2015). Reconceptualising science education practices from new literacies research. Science Education International, 26(3), 307-324. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1074880.pdf
Tang, K.S. (2016). How is disciplinary literacy addressed in the science classroom? A Singaporean case study. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 39(3), 220-232. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03651975
Tang, K.S. & Danielsson, K. (2018). The expanding development of literacy research in science education around the world. I: K.S. Tang & K. Danielsson (red.), Global Developments in Literacy Research for Science Education (s. 1-11). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69197-8_1
Tang, K.S., Delgado, C. & Moje, E.B. (2014). An integrative framework for the analysis of multiple and multimodal representations for meaning-making in science education. Science Education, 98(2), 305-326. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21099
Tierney, R.J. & Readence, J.E. (2000). Reading strategies and practices: A compendium (5. udg.). Allyn & Bacon.
Sjöström, J., Frerichs, N., Zuin, V.G. & Eilks, I. (2017). Use of the concept of Bildung in the international science education literature, its potential, and implications for teaching and learning. Studies in Science Education, 53(2), 165-192. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2017.1384649
Volkwyn, T.S., Airey, J., Gregoric, B. & Heijkenskjöld, F. (2019). Transduction and science learning: Multimodality in the physics laboratory. Designs for Learning, 11(1), 16-29. https://doi.org/10.16993/dfl.118
Welsh, K.M., Brock, C.H., Robertson, D.A. & Thrailkill, L. (D.) (2020). Disciplinary literacy in a second-grade classroom: A science inquiry unit. The Reading Teacher, 73(6), 723-734. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1881