Kontaktperson for abonnementer E-mail: mona@ind.ku.dk For nærmere om abonnement på MONA gå til http://www.ind.ku.dk/mona/abonnement
Spring til hovednavigations-menu Spring til hovedindhold Spring til bundtekst
##common.pageHeaderLogo.altText##

Artikler

Nr. 2 (2024)

Matematiklærernes didaktiske brugsmønstre og elevhandlinger når læremidlet MatematikFessor anvendes i undervisningen

Fremsendt
juni 4, 2024
Publiceret
2024-06-05

Resumé

I denne artikel undersøger vi læreres og elevers brug af det digitale, adaptive læremiddel MatematikFessor med særligt fokus på lærernes brugsmønster og rammesætning, læremidlets feedback og hvordan denne anvendes, samt elevernes handlinger og deres motivation i forhold til arbejdet med læremidlet. Vores datagrundlag udgøres af seks cases med observation af undervisningen, interviews med lærerne og interview og skærmoptagelse med to elever fra hver klasse. I artiklen beskriver vi dels hvordan lærernes og elevernes brugsmønstre tager sig ud i vores cases, men også hvordan vi vil anbefale at lærerne i højere grad rammesætter og støtter elevernes brug af læremidlet.

Referencer

  1. Alseth, B., Breiteig, T. & Brekke, G. (2003). Endringer og utvikling ved R97 som bakgrunn for videre planlegging og justering – matematikkfaget som kasus. Telemarksforsking Notodden.
  2. Brousseau, G. (1997). Theory of Didactical Situations in Mathematics: Didactique des Mathématiques, 1970‑1990. (N. Balacheff, M. Cooper, R. Sutherland & V. Warfield, overs.). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  3. Brusilovsky, P. (1999). Adaptive and Intelligent Technologies for Web-Based Education. Künstliche Intelligenz, 13(4), 19‑25. https://www.contrib.andrew.cmu.edu/~plb/papers/KI-review.html
  4. Bulman, G. & Fairlie, R.W. (2016). Technology and Education: Computers, Software, and the Internet. I: E.A. Hanushek, S. Machin & L. Woessmann (red.), Handbook of the Economics of Education (5. bind, s. 239‑280). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978‑0‑444‑63459‑7.00005‑1
  5. Børne- og Undervisningsministeriet. (2019). Matematik – faghæfte 2019. https://emu.dk/sites/default/files/2020‑09/GSK_Fagh%C3%A6fte_Matematik.pdf
  6. Cuban, L. (2015). The Lack of Evidence-Based Practice: The Case of Classroom Technology. https://www.larrycuban.wordpress.com/2015/02/05/the-lack-of-evidence-based-practice-the-caseof-classroom-technology-part-1/
  7. du Boulay, B. (2016). Artificial Intelligence as an Effective Classroom Assistant. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 31(6), 76‑81. https://doi.org/10.1109/MIS.2016.93
  8. Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five Misunderstandings about Case-Study Research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219‑245. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800405284363
  9. Gerick, J., Eickelmann, B. & Vennemann, M. (2014). Zum Wirkungsbereich digitaler Medien in Schule und Unterricht. Jahrbuch der Schulentwicklung, 18, 206‑238. https://www.fachportalpaedagogik.de/literatur/vollanzeige.html?FId=3223492
  10. Gilje, Ø., Ingulfsen, L., Dolonen, J.A., Furberg, A., Rasmussen, I., Kluge, A., Knain, E., Mørch, A., Naalsund, M. & Skarpaas, K.G. (2016). Med ARK&APP – bruk av læremidler og ressurser for læring på tvers av arbeidsformer. Universitetet i Oslo.
  11. Gissel, S.T. (2015). Digitale læremidler til læse- og skriveundervisning – hvad skal vi med dem? Læsepædagogen, 63(3), 4‑9. https://www.ucviden.dk/da/publications/digitalel%C3%A6remidler-til-l%C3%A6se-og-skriveundervisning-hvad-skal-vi-m
  12. Gissel, S.T. & Buch, B. (2020). A Systematic Review of Research on How Students and Teachers Use Didactic Learning Materials in L1. Learning Tech, 7, 90‑129. https://doi.org/10.7146/lt.v5i7.117281
  13. Gissel, S.T., Gynther, K., Hansen, T.I., Højgaard, T., Jørnø, R.V.L., Nortvig, A.-M. & Pettersson, M.
  14. (2020). Rhapsode – design, brug og virkning. https://laeremiddel.dk/viden-og-vaerktoejer/rapporter-2/rhapsode-design-brug-og-virkning/
  15. Gissel, S.T. & Hansen, T.I. (2021). Learning Materials between Didactic Potential and Control. I:
  16. M. Roos, K.L. Berge, H. Edgren, P. Hiidenmaa & C. Matthiesen (red.), Exploring Textbooks and
  17. Cultural Change in Nordic Education 1536‑2020 (s. 302‑317). Brill.
  18. Gissel, S.T., Hjelmborg, M.D., Kristensen, B.T. & Larsen, D.M. (2019). Kompetencedækning i analoge matematiksystemer til mellemtrinnet. MONA, 2019(3), 7‑27. https://tidsskrift.dk/mona/article/view/115580/163893
  19. Gissel, S.T. & Skovmand, K. (2018). Kategorisering af digitale læremidler – en undersøgelse af didaktiske, digitale læremidlers karakteristika. https://laeremiddel.dk/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/Kategorisering-af-digitale-l%C3%A6remidler.pdf
  20. Hiim, H. & Hippe, E. (2002). Læring gennem oplevelse, forståelse og handling – en studiebog i didaktik. Gyldendal.
  21. Holmes, W., Anastopoulou, S., Schaumburg, H. & Mavrikis, M. (2018). Technology-Enhanced Personalised Learning: Untangling the Evidence. Robert Bosch Stiftung.
  22. Kerr, P. (2016). Adaptive Learning. ELT Journal, 70(1), 88‑93. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccv055
  23. Knudsen, S.V. (red.). (2011). Internasjonal forskning på læremidler – en kunnskapsstatus. Høgskolen i Vestfold.
  24. Kulik, J. & Fletcher, J.D. (2016). Effectiveness of Intelligent Tutoring Systems: A Meta-Analytic Review. Review of Educational Research, 86(1), 42‑78. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315581420
  25. Kvale, S. & Brinkmann, S. (2015). Interview – det kvalitative forskningsinterview som håndværk. Hans Reitzels Forlag.
  26. Le, N.-T. (2016). A Classification of Adaptive Feedback in Educational Systems for Programming. Systems, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/systems4020022
  27. Liu, M., McKelroy, E., Corliss, S. & Carrigan, J. (2017). Investigating the Effects of an Adaptive Learning Intervention on Students’ Learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65, 1605‑1625. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423‑017‑9542‑1
  28. Manzano-León, A., Camacho-Lazarraga, P., Guerrero, M.A., Guerrero-Puerta, L., Aguilar-Parra, J.M.,Trigueros, R. & Alias, A. (2021). Between Level Up and Game Over: A Systematic Literature Review of Gamification in Education. Sustainability, 13(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13042247
  29. Mogensen, A. (2012). Når pointer styrer matematikundervisning. MONA, 2012(3), 40‑54. https://tidsskrift.dk/mona/article/view/35969/37323
  30. Nielsen, J., Clemmensen, T. & Yssing, C. (2002). Getting Access to What Goes on in People’s Heads? Reflections on the Think-Aloud Technique. I: NordiCHI ‘02: Proceedings of the Second Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (s. 101‑110). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/572020.572033
  31. Niss, M., Andreasen, M., Hansen, K.F., Matthiasen, J., Mogensen, A., Skånstrøm, M. & Holm, C. (2006). Fremtidens matematik i folkeskolen – rapport fra udvalget til forberedelse af en handlingsplan for matematik i folkeskolen. Undervisningsministeriet.
  32. OECD. (2015). Students, Computers and Learning: Making the Connection. OECD Publishing.
  33. Raudaskoski, P.L. (2020). Observationsmetoder (herunder videoobservation). I: S. Brinkmann & L. Tanggaard (red.), Kvalitative metoder – en grundbog (s. 117‑135). Hans Reitzels Forlag.
  34. Remillard, J.T. (2005). Examining Key Concepts in Research on Teachers’ Use of Mathematics Curricula. Review of Educational Research, 75(2), 211‑246. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543075002211
  35. Skemp, R.R. (1976). Relational Understanding and Instrumental Understanding. Mathematics Teaching, 77(1), 20‑26.
  36. Somyürek, S. (2015). The New Trends in Adaptive Educational Hypermedia Systems. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(1), 221‑241. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v16i1.1946
  37. Stoyanov, S. & Kirchner, P. (2004). Expert Concept Mapping Method for Defining the Characteristics of Adaptive E-Learning: ALFANET project case. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52, 41‑54. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504838
  38. Styrelsen for It og Læring. (2021). Lærernes digitale hverdag – kvantitativ kortlægning. https://www.uvm.dk/-/media/filer/uvm/aktuelt/pdf21/jun/210621-rapporten-laererens-digitalehverdag.pdf
  39. Tamim, R., Bernard, R.M., Borokhovski, E., Abrami, P.C. & Schmid, R.F. (2011). What Forty Years of Research Says About the Impact of Technology on Learning: A Second-Order Meta-Analysis and Validation Study. Review of Educational Research, 81(1), 4‑28. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654310393361
  40. Taylor, R.P. (1980). Introduction. I: R.P. Taylor (red.), The Computer in School: Tutor, Tool, Tutee (s. 1‑10). Teachers College Press.
  41. Verdú, E., Regueras, L.M., Verdú, M.J., de Castro, J.P. & Perez, M.A. (2008). Is Adaptive Learning Effective? A Review of the Research. I: Q. Li, S.Y. Chen, A. Xu & M. Li (red.), Advances on Applied Computer and Applied Computational Science (s. 710‑715). WSEAS Press.
  42. Walkington, C. (2013). Using Adaptive Learning Technologies to Personalize Instruction to Student Interests: The Impact of Relevant Contexts on Performance and Learning Outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(4), 932‑945. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031882
  43. Wang, S., Christensen, C., Cui, W., Tong, R., Yarnall, L., Shear, L. & Feng, M. (2020). When Adaptive Learning Is Effective Learning: Comparison of an Adaptive Learning System to Teacher-Led Instruction. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(2), 793‑803. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1808794

Mest læste artikler af samme forfatter(e)