Embodied practices of prosthesis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/kkf.v31i2.127874Keywords:
prosthesis, embodied practices, disability, therapeutic and healthcare-related interventionsAbstract
While the prosthesis is often thought of as a technology or an artefact used to ‘fix’ or make ‘whole’ a disabled body, it has also become an important figuration and metaphor for thinking about disabled embodiment as an emblematic manifestation of bodily difference and mobility. Furthermore, the ambiguity and broadness of prosthesis as an object and a concept, as well as its potential as a theoretical and analytical thinking tool, show up in widely different areas of popular culture, art and academic scholarship. In this article, we explore the opportunities of the ways in which prosthesis might be a helpful and productive fi gure in relation to framing, analyzing and understanding certain healthcare-related practices that are not traditionally associated with disability. Our aim is to suggest new ways of building onto the idea of the performative value of the prosthetic fi gure and its logics as a continuum through which very different forms of embodied practices could be meaningfully understood and analyzed. Thus, we argue that the logic of the prosthesis can be helpful in uncovering tensions related to idealistic and dominant ideas about health and embodiment. First, we engage with the theoretical discussions from cultural studies, including critical disability studies, in which we broaden the scope of the concept of prosthesis. Second, we introduce and discuss two illustrative case examples in the form of dance therapeutic practices for people with Parkinson’s disease and group therapeutic practices in male-friendly spaces. In doing so, we seek to raise new questions about the ongoing cultivation of bodily and health-related interventions through the lens of the prosthetic spectrum, which we have labelled embodied practices of prosthesis.
References
Aguiar, L.P.C., da Rocha, P.A. & Morris, M. 2016. Therapeutic Dancing for Parkinson’s Disease. International Journal of Parkinsonism and Restless Legs Syndrome, 4, 1-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijge.2016.02.002
Al-Zubi, H. 2007. Autopathography and Audre Lorde’s the Cancer Journals as a Narrative of Illness. Revising the Script of Disease. Dirasat: Human & Social Sciences, 34, 857-870.
Barker, G., Ricardo, C., Nascimento, M., Olukoya, A. & Santos, C. 2010. Questioning gender norms with men to improve health outcomes: evidence of impact. Glob Public Health, 5, 539–553. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17441690902942464
Booher. A.K. 2010. Docile bodies, supercrips, and the plays of prosthetics. International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics (Special Issue). Disability Studies in Feminist Bioethics, 3(2), 63-89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3138/ijfab.3.2.63
Butler, J. 1990. Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge. Cadwallader, J. & Murray, S. 2007. Introduction. Somatechnics: Reconfi guring Body Modifi cation (Special Issue). Social Semiotics, 17(3), 259-261. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330701448538
Campbell, F.K. 2009. Contours of Ableism. The Production of Disability and Abledness. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230245181
Christensen-Strynø, M.B. 2016. Mainstreaming and misfi tting: Exploring disability and its intersection with gender in online disability awareness-raising videos. MedieKultur: Journal of media and communication research, 32(61), 58-75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v32i61.22387
Christensen-Strynø, M.B. 2018. Online mediations of Disabled Embodiment. Intimacies / Mobilities / Temporalities. PhD dissertation, Department for Communication and Arts, Roskilde University.
Christensen-Strynø, M.B. 2020. Writing Letters to the Dead: Cripping Networked Temporalities on Social Media. Scandinavian Journal of Disability research, 22(1), 88-96. DOI: hhtp://doi.org/10.16993/ sjdrr.627.
Christensen-Strynø, M.B. & Eriksen, C.B. 2020. Madeline Stuart as disability advocate and brand: Exploring the affective economies of social media. In: Garrisi, D. & Johanssen, J. (eds.). Disability, Media, and Representations: Other Bodies. New York & Abingdon: Routledge.
Christie, E. & Bloustein, G. 2010. I-cyborg: disability, affect and public pedagogy. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 31(4), 483-498. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2010.504364
Crompvoets, S. 2012. Prosthetic fantasies: loss, recovery, and the marketing of wholeness after breast cancer. Social Semiotics, 22(1), 107-120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2012.640058
Eriksen, C.B. 2017. FAT. Pop Cultural Narratives about the Fat Body. PhD dissertation, Department for the Study of Culture, University of Southern Denmark.
Ford, S., Scholz, B., & Lu, V.N. 2015. Social shedding: Identifi cation and health of men’s sheds users. Health Psychology, 34(7), 775-778. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/hea0000171
Forum for mænds sundhed. s.d. Om os [online]. [Accessed on 21-08-2020]: Available at: http://www. sundmand.dk/Om-os.php
Garoian, C.R. 2013. The Prosthetic Pedagogy of Art. Embodied Research and Practice. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Goggin, G. & Newell, C. 2005. Introduction: The Intimate Relations Between Technology and Disability [online]. Disability Studies Quarterly, 25(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.18061/dsq.v25i2.547
Goodley, D. 2013. Dis/entangling critical disability studies. Disability & Society, 28(5), 631-644. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2012.717884
Golding, B. (ed.). 2015. The men’s shed movement: The company of men. Champaign, Illinois: Common Ground Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18848/978-1-61229-788-0/CGP
Grosz, E.A. 1994. Volatile bodies: Toward a corporeal feminism. Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Press.
Hackney, M. & Bennett, C. 2014. Dance therapy for individuals with Parkinson’s disease: improving quality of life. International Journal of Parkinsonism and Restless Legs Syndrome, 4, 17-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/JPRLS.S40042
Haraway, D. 1988. Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist studies, 14(3), 575-599. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3178066
Herndl, D.P. 2002. Reconstructing the Posthuman Feminist Body Twenty Years after Audre Lorde’s Cancer Journals. In: Warhol-Down, R. & Herndl, D. P. (eds.) Feminisms REDUX: An Anthology of Literary Theory and Criticism (2009), 477-486. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Rutgers University Press
Houston, S. 2019. Dancing with Parkinson’s. Bristol, UK: Intellect Ltd.
Jain, S.S. 1999. The Prosthetic Imagination: Enabling and Disabling the Prosthesis Trope. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 24(1), 31-54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/016224399902400103
Kunsthal Charlottenborg (s.d.). 2019. Jesper Just - Servitudes [online]. [Accessed on 21-08-2020]: Available at: https://kunsthalcharlottenborg.dk/en/exhibitions/jesper-just/
Lorde, A. 1980. The cancer journals. San Francisco: Aunt Lute Books.
Lupton, E., & Miller, A. 1996. Bathroom, the Kitchen, and the Aesthetics of Waste (A Process of Elimination). Hudson, NY: Princeton Architectural Press.
Major, W. 2002. Audre Lorde’s The Cancer Journals: Autopathography as Resistance. Mosaic: A Journal for the interdisciplinary Study of Literature, 35.2 (June 2002), 39-56.
McGill, A., Houston, S. & Lee, R.Y.W. 2014. Dance for Parkinson’s: A new framework for research on its physical, mental, emotional, and social benefi ts. Complementary Therapies in Medicine, 22(3), 426-432. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctim.2014.03.005
Men’s shed (s.d.).What is a Men’s Shed? [online]. [Accessed on 15-07-2020]: Available at: https://menssheds. org.uk/about/what-is-a-mens-shed
Mitchell, D.T. & Snyder, S.L. 2000. Narrative Prosthesis. Disability and the Dependencies of Discourse. An Arbor: The University of Michigan Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.11523
Ott, K. 2002. The Sum of Its Parts. An Introduction to Modern Histories of Prosthetics. In: K. Ott, D. Serlin & Mihm, S. (eds.) Artifi cial Parts, Practical Lives. Modern Histories of Prosthetics. New York & London: New York University Press.
Parkinsonforeningen (s.d.). Fakta om Parkinson [online]. [Accessed on 29-08-2020]: Available at: https://www.parkinson.dk/fakta-om-parkinson
Reeve, D. 2012. Cyborgs, cripples and iCrip: Refl ections on the contribution of Haraway to disability studies. In: Goodley, D., Hughes B. & Davis, L. (eds.) Disability and Social Theory. New Developments and Directions, US91-111. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137023001_6
Reiffenrath, T. 2016. Memoirs of Well-being. Rewriting Discourses of Illness and Disability. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839435465
Sawchuk, K. 2013. Imparied. In: Adey, P, Bissell, D., Hannam, K., Merriman, P. & Sheller, M. (eds.) The Routledge Handbook of Mobilities, 409. Taylor and Francis. ProQuest Ebook Central. [Accessed on 29-08-
: Available at: http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kbdk/detail.action?docID=1596850.
Scarry, E. 1985. The Body in Pain: The Making and Unmaking of the World. New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Shildrick, M. 2013. Re-imagining embodiment: Prostheses, supplements and boundaries. Somatechnics, 3(2), 270-286. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3366/soma.2013.0098
Shildrick, M. 2015. Why Should Our Bodies End at the Skin?: Embodiment, Boundaries, and Somatechnics. Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy, 30(1), 13-29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/hypa.12114
Shildrick, M. 2017. Border Crossings: The Technologies of Disability and Desire. In: Waldschmidt, A., Berressem, H. & Ingwersen, M. (eds.) Culture – Theory – Disability. Encounters between Disability Studies and Cultural Studies. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag, 137-151. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839425336-010
Sobchack, V. 2006. A Leg to Stand On: Prosthetics, Metaphor, and Materiality. In: Smith, M. & Morra, J. (eds.). The Prosthetic Impulse: From a Posthuman Present to a Biocultural Future, 17-41. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Sobchack, V. 2010. Living a ‘Phantom Limb’: On the Phenomenology of Bodily Integrity. Body & Society, 16(3), 51-67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X10373407
Sullivan, N. & Murray, S. 2009. Somatechnics: queering the technologization of bodies. Farnham, Surrey/ Burlington, VT: Ashgate. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315609867
Waples, E. 2013. Emplotted bodies: Breast cancer, feminism, and the future. Tulsa Studies in Women’s Literature, Oct 1, 47-70.
WHO – World Health Organization. 2018. The health and well-being of men in the WHO European Region: better health through a gender approach [online]. [Accessed on 15-07-2020]: Available at: http://www.euro.who.int/en/publications/abstracts/the-health-and-well-being-of-men-in-the-who-european-regionbetter-health-through-a-gender-approach-2018
Wills, D. 1995. Prosthesis. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Publications in Women, Gender and Research are licensed under Creative Commons License: CC Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0