The Future of Women’s and Gender Research
Digital Lives in the Swedish Archives
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/kkf.v39i1.158480Nøgleord:
Arkiver, Kvinde- og kønsforskning, feminisme, Opkøb, digitaliseringResumé
The future of historical women’s and gender research is uncertain for two reasons. First, the digitization of society affects how women and gender are represented online. Questions about what can and should constitute “an archive” need answering, particularly for women’s and gender activism, which is no longer tied to formal associations and often spans the physical/digital divide. This raises new ethical and legal issues related to GDPR and the private ownership of communication platforms where activist work occurs. Second, what counts as “women’s and gender historical material” is unstable. Current research emphasizes intersectionality and multiculturalism, often critiquing the whiteness and middle-class normativity of earlier feminist scholarship. At the same time, activists disagree on the meaning and application of these concepts, creating tensions within feminism that do not always align with scholarship focused on narrower research questions. This exploratory article examines archival acquisition policies in Swedish cultural heritage institutions from a feminist “information activism” perspective, drawing on community archive research to assess whether Swedish institutions are preparing to collect future women’s and gender archival materials and what kinds of women’s and gender histories these materials will make available to future researchers.
Referencer
Axelsson, B. (2015). The Poetics and Politics of the Swedish Model for Contemporary Collecting. Museum and Society, 12(1), 14–28. https://doi.org/10.29311/mas.v12i1.244
Bastian, J. A., & Flinn, A. (2020). Community archives, community spaces: heritage, memory and identity. Facet Publishing.
Boczar, A. (2025). Starting with the Digital Doesn’t Make It Easier: Developing Transparent Born Digital Acquisition Policies for Archives. International Journal of Digital Curation, 19(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.2218/ijdc.v19i1.944
Bossewitch, J., & Sinnreich, A. (2013). The end of forgetting: Strategic agency beyond the panopticon. New Media & Society, 15(2), 224–242. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444812451565
Boyles, C. (2018). Making and Breaking: Teaching Information Ethics through Curatorial Practice. Digital Humanities Quarterly, 12(4).
Brown, R. (1991). Records Acquisition Strategy and Its Theoretical Foundation: The Case for a Concept of Archival Hermeneutics. Archivaria, 33, 34.
Callahan, S. (2024). When the Dust Has Settled: What Was the Archival Turn, and Is It Still Turning? Art Journal (New York. 1960), 83(1), 74–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043249.2024.2317690
Carter, C., McLaughlin, L., & Steiner, L. (2013). The Routledge companion to media and gender. Taylor and Francis.
Caswell, M. (2021). Urgent Archives: Enacting Liberatory Memory Work. Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003001355
Conrad, R. (2023). Generated Vulnerability: Male Sex Workers, Third-Party Platforms, and Data Security. In Queer Data Studies, ed. Keilty, P. University of Washington Press.
Cowan, T. L., & Rault, J. (2018). Onlining queer acts: Digital research ethics and caring for risky archives. Women & Performance, 28(2), 121–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/0740770X.2018.1473985
D’Ignazio, C., Klein, L. F., & EBSCOhost. (2020). Data feminism. The MIT Press.
Edquist, S. (2018). De Enskilda arkiven i historisk kontext. In Enskilda arkiv, ed. Hagström, C. & Ketola, A. Studentlitteratur.
Eichhorn, K. (2013). The archival turn in feminism: outrage in order. Temple University Press.
Ericson, T. L. (1992). At the “rim of creative dissatisfaction”: archivists and acquisition development. Archivaria, 33.
Eubanks, V. (2017). Automating inequality: how high-tech tools profile, police, and punish the poor. St. Martin’s Press.
Farge, A., Scott-Railton, T., & Davis, N. Z. (2013). The allure of the archives. Yale University Press.
Gerrard, M. (2015). “No Fame Required”: Collaboration, Community, and the Georgia LGBTQ Archives Project. In Appraisal and Acquisitions: Innovative Practices for Archives and Special Collections, ed. Theimer, K. Rowman & Littlefield.
Ham, F. G. (1975). The Archival Edge. The American Archivist, 38(1), 5–13. https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.38.1.7400r86481128424
Henry, L. J. (1980). Collecting Policies of Special-Subject Repositories. The American Archivist, 43(1), 57–63. https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.43.1.3751153111118078
Isacson, M. & Olausson. (2018). “De enskilda arkiven och framtiden”. In Enskilda arkiv, ed. Hagström, C. & Ketola, A. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
Jaillant, L. (2022). How can we make born-digital and digitised archives more accessible? Identifying obstacles and solutions. Archival Science, 22(3), 417–436. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-022-09390-7
Johansson, M. (2023). Att upphandla och driva e-arkiv: marknad, omvärld och behov. Vulkan.
Keilty, P., Herzig, R., & Subramaniam, B. (2024). Queer Data Studies (1st ed.). University of Washington Press. https://doi.org/10.3828/9780295751962
Larsson Pousette, H., Thomsgård, L., & Stockholms kvinnohistoriska. (2021). Arkivism: en handbok: hitta, spara och organisera för framtidens historieskrivning (Första upplagan). Stockholms Kvinnohistoriska : Volante.
Losman. (1984). ”Kvinnohistoriskt arkiv och de kvinnohistoriska samlingarna i Göteborg”. In Bibliotheca Feminarum: Om de kvinnohistoriska samlingarna i Göteborg, kvinnoliv och kvinnotanke under 300 år. Servicekontorets Grafiska.
Martinez, K., Cupitt, J., Saunders, D., & Pillay, R. (2002). Ten years of art imaging research. Proceedings of the IEEE, 90(1), 28–41. https://doi.org/10.1109/5.982403
McKinney, C. (2020). Information activism: a queer history of lesbian media technologies. Duke University Press.
Melander, E. (2006). Pennskaft och reportrar, konstnärer och fria medarbetare: kvinnor i Sveriges pressarkiv. EB-nytt, 27–39.
Mina, A. X. (2019). Memes to movements: how the world’s most viral media is changing social protest and power. Beacon Press.
Noble, S. U. (2018). Algorithms of oppression: how search engines reinforce racism. New York University Press.
Nordenstam, A. (2008). Genus och arkiv. Vetenskapsrådet.
Odumosu, T. (2020). The Crying Child: On Colonial Archives, Digitization, and Ethics of Care in the Cultural Commons. Current Anthropology, 61(S22), S289–S302. https://doi.org/10.1086/710062
Otterbacher, J., Checco, A., Demartini, G., & Clough, P. (2018). Investigating User Perception of Gender Bias in Image Search: The Role of Sexism. The 41st International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research & Development in Information Retrieval, 933–936. https://doi.org/10.1145/3209978.3210094
Pihl Skoog, E. (2022). Skiss till genushistoria i dag och det trubbiga begreppet kvinna: några reflektioner med anledning av Historisk tidskrifts temanummer ”Kvinnor”. Historisk tidskrift (Stockholm), 142(1), 51–59.
Proffitt, J. M., Ekbia, H. R., & McDowell, S. D. (2015). Introduction to the Special Forum on Monetization of User-Generated Content-Marx Revisited. The Information Society, 31(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2015.977624
Selleby, L. (1998). Riksarkivet – kvinnoarkiv, Sofia 2, 9-11.
Shusko, C. (2024). Weird Digitization: Alternative Strategies for Archival Materials. Linneus University. Retrieved from https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-127289
Star, S. L. ([1994]2016). Misplaced Concretism and Concrete Situations. In Boundary Objects and Beyond: Working with Leigh Star, ed. Bowker, G. C. et al. MIT Press.
Star, S. L., & Ruhleder, K. (1996). Steps Toward an Ecology of Infrastructure: Design and Access for Large Information Spaces. Information Systems Research, 7(1), 111–134. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.7.1.111
SOU 2019:58 Härifrån till evigheten: en långsiktig arkivpolitik för förvaltning och kulturarv. (2019). Norstedts juridik.
Svenska arkivförbundet. (2024). Kartläggning av enkilda arkiv: förstudie. Svenska arkivförbundet. Available at https://usercontent.one/wp/www.arkivforbundet.se/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/Forstudie-digital-uppslag.pdf
Theimer, K. (ed.) (2015). Appraisal and Acquisitions: Innovative Practices for Archives and Special Collections. Rowman & Littlefield
Thylstrup, N. B., Agostinho, D., D’Ignazio, C., Veel, K., & Ring, A. (2021). Uncertain archives: critical keywords for big data. The MIT Press.
Van Wingen, M., Bass, A., & Greifender, E. (2008). Reappraising archival practice in light of the new social history. Library Hi Tech, 26(4), 575–585. https://doi.org/10.1108/07378830810920905
Velte, A. (2018). Ethical Challenges and Current Practices in Activist Social Media Archives. The American Archivist, 81(1), 112–134. https://doi.org/10.17723/0360-9081-81.1.112
Scott, J. W. (2011). The fantasy of feminist history. Duke University Press.
Welander, LO. (1982). Arkivfrågor hos kvinnoorganisationer, Meddelanden från Svenska Riksarkivet för åren 1978–1979, ed. Tarkianen, K., 20-24. Riksarkivet.
White, D. G. (1987). Mining the Forgotten: Manuscript Sources for Black Women’s History. The Journal of American History (Bloomington, Ind.), 74(1), 237–242. https://doi.org/10.2307/1908622
Wilson, N., Battershill, C., Clarkson, H., Hannah, M. N., Nokhrin, I., & Willson Gordon, E. (2022). Digital critical archives, copyright, and feminist praxis. Archival Science, 22(3), 295–317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-021-09384-x
Withers, D. M. (2015). Feminism, Digital Culture and the Politics of Transmission: Theory, Practice and Cultural Heritage. Rowman & Littlefield International.
Yale, E. (2015). The History of Archives: The State of the Discipline. Book History, 18(1), 332–359. https://doi.org/10.1353/bh.2015.0007
Zastrow, J. (2016). Digital acquisitions and donor relations: assets, apprehensions, and anxieties. (The Digital Archivist: Trends in Curation and Digital Preservation for Special Collections). In Computers in libraries (Vol. 36, Number 5, p. 16). Information Today, Inc.
Downloads
Publiceret
Citation/Eksport
Nummer
Sektion
Licens
Copyright (c) 2026 Rachel Pierce
Dette værk er under følgende licens Creative Commons Navngivelse –Ikke-kommerciel (by-nc).
Udgivelser i Kvinder, Køn og Forskning er beskyttet under Creative Commons License: CC Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0
