Operationelle læringsmål: Revision med studenterinddragelse

Authors

  • Marianne Ellegaard Københavns Professionshøjskole
  • Henriette Lorenzen Københavns Professionshøjskole
  • Jesper Bahrenscheer Københavns Professionshøjskole

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7146/dut.v19i36.140195

Abstract

We present a development project where the teachers at XX at YY have jointly revised all the learning objectives of the programme.
The purpose was to promote the students' understanding of the objectives, which is why the revision work, among other things,
is based on input from the students, in the form of a survey before the work was initiated, as well as feedback on pilot versions
of the revised formulations. The development work was carried out in a collaboration between all lecturers, in working groups
for each semester and with peer feedback between semesters on draft descriptions. The result was: • Fewer learning objectives with a clear separation between objectives and content • A standardized format via a common template for descriptions for all semesters • Clearer and for the students more comprehensible wording: More user-friendly, and uniform language between semesters • A short and precise format that focuses on what the students must be able to do with the academic content of the course/semester

References

Bekendtgørelse 771 (2023). https://www.retsinformation.dk/eli/lta/2023/771

Biggs, J.B., C Tang, G. Kennedy (2022). Teaching for Quality Learning at University. 5 udg., 1. udg. 1999. Maidenhead, Open University Press.

Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: Cognitive and affective domains. New York: David McKay.

Brooks, S., Dobbins, K., Scott, J.J.A., Rawlinson, M. & Norman, R. I. (2014). Learning about learning outcomes: the student perspective, Teaching in Higher Education, 19 (6), 721-733. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2014.901964

Clausen, T. & Hvass, H. (2018). Hvad lærer de studerende, at de skal lære? en undersøgelse af kandidatstuderendes opfattelse og brug af læringsmål, Dansk Universitetspædagogisk Tidsskrift, 13(24), 5-19. https://doi.org/10.7146/dut.v13i24.96686

Christiansen, F. V., Horst, S., & Rump, C. Ø. (2013). Kursusbeskrivelser I: Rienecker L., Jørgensen P. S., Dolin, J., Ingerslev G. H. Universitetspædagogik. Frederiksberg: Samfundslitteratur, 133-143.

Lodder; N. & Meijers, F. (2017). Collective learning, transformational leadership and new forms of careers guidance in universities. British journal of guidance & counselling, 45(5), 532-546. https://doi.org/10.1080/03069885.2016.1271864

Erikson, M.G. & Erikson, M. (2019). Learning outcomes and critical thinking - good intentions in conflict. Studies in Higher Education, 44(12), 2293-2303. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2018.1486813

Schoepp, K. (2019). The state of course learning outcomes at leading universities. Studies in Higher Education, 44(4), 615-627. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2017.1392500

Olin, S.J., Springer, C. & Royal, K. (2022). Veterinary Students' Use of Learning Objectives, Journal of Veterinary Medical Education, 49(6), 751-758. https://doi.org/10.3138/jvme-2021-0023

Sin, C. (2014). Lost in translation: the meaning of learning outcomes across national and institutional policy contexts. Studies in Higher Education, 39(10), 1823-1837. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2013.806463

Thomasen, I.N., Lorenzen, H. & Johnsen, S. (2019). Gruppebaserede læringsrum - rummer de læring? Studerendes oplevelser af tre forskellige læringsrum, Dansk Universitetspædagogisk Tidsskrift 14(27), 155-176. https://doi.org/10.7146/dut.v14i27.112641

Downloads

Published

2024-05-23

How to Cite

Ellegaard, M., Lorenzen, H., & Bahrenscheer, J. (2024). Operationelle læringsmål: Revision med studenterinddragelse. The Danish Journal of Higher Education, 19(36). https://doi.org/10.7146/dut.v19i36.140195