DUT Guide on meaningful digital teaching-learning interactions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/dut.v18i34.136265Resumé
Digital teaching-learning interactions are never neutral. Rather, they involve a multi-way process with many interactants, motives, materials, and actions affecting students’ sense-making. To make digital interactions meaningful on the students’ part, this guide suggests supporting students’ feelings of autonomy, competence, and relatedness. Based on research and experiences from practice, this guide provides six tips for educators on what to consider and how to plan for meaningful digital teaching-learning interactions in higher education.
Referencer
Ashwin, P. (2008). Accounting for structure and agency in 'close-up'research on teaching, learning and assessment in higher education. International Journal of Educational Research, 47(3), 151-158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2008.01.002
Bates, T. (2019). Teaching in a Digital Age (Second ed.). Tony Bates Associates Ltd.
Biggs, J. (1996). Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment. Higher Education, 32(3), 347-364. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00138871
Bizami, N. A., Tasir, Z., & Kew, S. N. (2022). Innovative pedagogical principles and technological tools capabilities for immersive blended learning: a systematic literature review. Education and Information Technologies , 1-53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11243-w
Bockorny, K. M., Giannavola, T. M., Mathew, S., & Walters, H. D. (2023). Effective engagement strategies in HyFlex modality based on intrinsic motivation in students. Active Learning in Higher Education, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/14697874231161364
Carless, D. and Boud, D. (2018). The development of student feedback literacy: enabling uptake of feedback, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 43, 8, 1315-1325. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354
Damgaard, M. T., & Nielsen, H. S. (2018). Nudging in education. Economics of Education Review, 64, 313-342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2018.03.008
Damşa, C., de Lange, T., Elken, M., Esterhazy, R., Fossland, T., Frølich, N., Hovdhaugen, E., Maassen, P., Nerland, M., & Nordkvelle, Y. T. (2015). Quality in Norwegian Higher Education: A review of research on aspects affecting student learning. Oslo: Nordic Institute for Studies in Innovation, Research and Education (NIFU).
Ellis, R. A., & Goodyear, P. (2019). The Education Ecology of Universities: Integrating Learning, Strategy and the Academy. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351135863
Fawns, T. (2022). An Entangled Pedagogy: Looking Beyond the Pedagogy-Technology Dichotomy. Postdigital Science and Education, 4(3), 711-728. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-022-00302-7
Garrison, D. R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 7(2), 95-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.02.001
Garrison, D. R., & Cleveland-Innes, M. (2005). Facilitating cognitive presence in online learning: Interaction is not enough. The American Journal of Distance Education, 19(3), 133-148. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15389286ajde1903_2
Georgiakakis, P., Retalis, S., & Psaromiligkos, Y. (2010). Design patterns for inspection-based usability evaluation of e-learning systems. In P. Goodyear & S. Retalis (Eds.). Technology-Enhanced Learning, (pp. 167-182). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789460910623_011
Hrastinski, S. (2008). Asynchronous and synchronous e-learning. Educause Quarterly, 31(4), 51-55.
Lai, M., Lam, K. M., & Lim, C. P. (2016). Design principles for the blend in blended learning: a collective case study. Teaching in Higher Education, 21(6), 716-729. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2016.1183611
Lillejord, S., Børte, K., Nesje, K., & Ruud, E. (2018). Learning and teaching with technology in higher education - a systematic review. Oslo: Knowledge Centre for Education.
Maguire, D., Dale, L., & Pauli, M. (2020). Learning and teaching reimagined: a new dawn for higher education. JISC: Bristol, UK,
Martin, F., Polly, D., & Ritzhaupt, A. (2020). Bichronous Online Learning: Blending Asynchronous and Synchronous Online Learning. Educause Review.
Mayer, R. E. (2017). Using multimedia for e‐learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 33(5), 403-423. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12197
Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. (2007). Interactive multimodal learning environments. Educational Psychology Review, 19(3), 309-326. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-007-9047-2
Munday, D. (2022). Hybrid pedagogy and learning design influences in a higher education context. Studies in Technology Enhanced Learning, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.21428/8c225f6e.b5af8bae
Nielsen, J., & Loranger, H. (2006). Prioritising web usability. Pearson Education.
Nørgård, R. T., Toft-Nielsen, C., & Whitton, N. (2017). Playful learning in higher education: developing a signature pedagogy. International Journal of Play, 6(3), 272-282. https://doi.org/10.1080/21594937.2017.1382997
Pi, Z., Tang, M., & Yang, J. (2022). Seeing others' messages on the screen during video lectures hinders transfer of learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 30(10), 1809-1822. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1749671
Redmond, P., Abawi, L., Brown, A., Henderson, R., & Heffernan, A. (2018). An online engagement framework for higher education. Online Learning, 22(1), 183-204. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i1.1175
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
Ryan, R. & Deci, E. (2017): Self-Determination Theory. Basic Psychological Needs in Motivation, Development and Wellness. Guildford Press. https://doi.org/10.1521/978.14625/28806
Salmon, G. (2020). Module Carpe Diem Learning Design: Preparation & Workshop. Retrieved Feb 24. 2023, from https://www.gillysalmon.com/uploads/5/0/1/3/50133443/carpe_diem_planning_process_workbook_webversion1june2020.pdf.
Salmon, G. (2004). E-moderating: The key to teaching and learning online. Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203465424-12
Stenalt, M. H. (2021a). A constraint-based understanding of student learning in digital education. PhD Thesis. Aarhus: Aarhus University.
Stenalt, M. H. (2021b). Researching student agency in digital education as if the social aspects matter: students' experience of participatory dimensions of online peer assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(4), 644-658. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1798355
Stenalt, M. H. (2022). En metode til undersøgelse af digitale interaktioner fra de studerendes perspektiv. Tidsskriftet Læring Og Medier (LOM), 15(26) https://doi.org/10.7146/lom.v15i26.130397
Stenalt, M. H., & Lassesen, B. (2021). Does student agency benefit student learning? A systematic review of higher education research. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 47(5), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.1967874
Stenalt, M. H., Lassesen, B., Rossen, D. S., & Bager-Elsborg, A. (2019). Kan videregående uddannelser mindske frafald ved hjælp af læringsteknologi? Et systematisk review. Dansk Universitetspædagogisk Tidsskrift, 14(26), 82-102. https://doi.org/10.7146/dut.v14i26.108295
Stenalt, M. H., & Rossen, D. S. (2022). Onlineundervisning: En praksisnær guide til planlægning, gennemførelse og evaluering. Samfundslitteratur.
Thomas, G., & Thorpe, S. (2019). Enhancing the facilitation of online groups in higher education: a review of the literature on face-to-face and online group-facilitation. Interactive Learning Environments, 27(1), 62-71. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1451897
Western Sydney University (2023). Online engagement framework. Retrieved Feb. 24. 2023, from https://lf.westernsydney.edu.au/engage/theory/online-engagement-framework#toc-anchor-2.
Downloads
Publiceret
Citation/Eksport
Nummer
Sektion
Licens
DUT udkommer elektronisk via Statsbibliotekets Open Journal System (Tidsskrift.dk) og DUNs hjemmeside (DUN-net.dk) forår og efterår. Det er gratis og frit tilgængeligt at læse og downloade artikler fra tidsskriftet.
Det er ikke muligt at abonnere på Dansk Universitetspædagogisk Tidsskrift, DUT, men hvis du er medlem af DUN, får du tilsendt en nyhedsmail med link til udgivelsen, når den nyeste udgave er online. Linket vil også være tilgængeligt her på siden, så snart tidsskriftet er publiceret.
© Copyright
Artikler publiseret i Dansk Universitetspædagogisk Tidsskrift, DUT, må bruges (downloades) og genbruges (distribueres, kopieres, citeres) til ikke-kommercielle formål med reference til forfattere og Dansk Universitetspædagogisk Tidsskrift.
Artikler indsendt til Dansk Universitetspædagogisk Tidsskrift må ikke publiseres i andre tidskrifter.
Betingelser
Artikler i Dansk Universitetspædagogisk Tidsskrift, DUT, er omfattet af ophavsretsloven, og der må citeres fra dem.
Følgende betingelser skal dog være opfyldt:
- Citatet skal være i overensstemmelse med „god skik“
- Der må kun citeres „i det omfang, som betinges af formålet“
- Ophavsmanden til teksten skal krediteres, og kilden skal angives ift. ovenstående bibliografiske oplysninger.
