Invisible Walls in the Digital Welfare State
How Parents Navigate Marginalization and Agency in Digitally Mediated Encounters
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/kkf.v38i2.149908Keywords:
Digital Inequity, Intersectionality, Marginalization, Rights, ParentsAbstract
This article explores how marginalized parents navigate their digitally mediated contacts with the State. Combining intersectionality theory with Haraway’s concepts of cyborgs and string figures, I ask: How do social categories and digital infrastructures co-construct parents’ experiences of marginalization and agency? Using two vignettes based on ethnographic data collected through fieldnotes, future workshops, and interviews with marginalized parents, I display challenges, constraints, and moments of agency encountered as parents negotiate complex and interwoven power structures. I draw on key concepts that position digitalization not only as a mediator of citizen–state relations, but also as a structural force that shapes and reproduces social categories. Focusing on the fluidity of marginalization, I find that parents’ struggles to assert agency and safeguard their rights are simultaneously shaped by, and push back against, intersecting categories such as gender, ethnicity, race, and class, as well as the digital infrastructures that organize access to welfare services. Due to the digital infrastructure mediating citizen-state interactions, these struggles may be invisible to the institutions responsible for providing equitable access to help, potentially exacerbating marginalization. I conclude by discussing the broader implications for citizenship, social work values, and digital inclusion in a welfare state increasingly governed through technology.
References
Agency for Digitisation & the National Association of Municipalities (2021). Digital Inclusion in the Digitalized Society [Digital inklusion i det digitaliserede samfund] https://digst.dk/media/24389/digital-inklusion-i-det-digitaliserede-samfund.pdf
Ahmed, S. (2012). On being included. Racism and Diversity in Institutional Life. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822395324
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Carbado, D. W., Crenshaw, K. W., Mays, V. M., & Tomlinson, B. (2013). INTERSECTIONALITY: Mapping the Movements of a Theory1. Du Bois review: social science research on race, 10(2), 303-312. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742058X13000349
Carbin, M. & Tornhill, S. (2004) Intersektionalitet – ett oanvändbart begrepp? [Intersectionality – a useless concept?] Kvinnovetenskaplig Tidskrift [Journal of Gender Research] 25(3): 111–114.
Clarke, A. E., Friese, C., & Washburn, R. S. (2018). Situational analysis: Grounded theory after the interpretive turn (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
Christensen, A. D., & Jensen, S. Q. (2012). Doing intersectional analysis: Methodological implications for qualitative research. NORA-Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research, 20(2), 109-125. https://doi.org/10.1080/08038740.2012.673505
Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics, University of Chicago Legal Forum: 1989(1), 139-167. https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/uclf/vol1989/iss1/8
Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299. https://doi.org/10.2307/1229039
Emerson, R. M., Fretz, R. I., & Shaw, L. L. (1995). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. University of Chicago Press.
Hansen, H. T., Lundberg, K., & Syltevik, L. J. (2018). Digitalization, street‐level bureaucracy and welfare users’ experiences. Social policy & administration, 52(1), 67-90. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12283
Haraway, D. (1991). Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective. In D. Harraway (Ed.), Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature (pp. 183-201). Free Association Books.
Haraway, D. (1992). The Promises of Monsters: A Regenerative Politics for Inappropriate/d Others. In L. Grossberg, C. Nelson, & P. A. Treichler (Eds.), Cultural Studies (pp. 295–337). Routledge.
Haraway, D. J. (2016). Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the Chthulucene. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822373780
Haraway, D. (2021). Et cyborgmaniftest. Naturvidenskab, teknologi og socialistisk feminisme i det sene tyvende århundrede [A Cyborg Manifesto: Science, Technology, and Socialist-Feminism in the Late Twentieth Century]. (O.L. Henriksen, Trans.). Mindspace.
Høybye-Mortensen, M., & Højlund, H. (2024). Det digitale mødested. I Magtudredningen 2.0: Essays [The Digital Meeting place. The Danish Democracy and Power study, 2.0]. Institut for Statskundskab, Aarhus Universitet. https://ps.au.dk/fileadmin/Statskundskab/Billeder/Forskning/Forskningsprojekter/Magtudredning/Essays/Tema11/Essay_af_Matilde_Hoeybye-Mortensen___Holger_Hoejlund.pdf
Jungk, R. & Müllert, N.R. (1984). Håndbog i fremtidsværksteder. [Handbook in Future Workshops] (B. S. Nielsen,Trans.). Politisk Revy.
Jørring, L., Valentim, A., & Porten-Cheé, P. (2018). Mapping a Changing Field: A Literature Review on Digital Citizenship. Digital Culture & Society, 4(2), 11-38. https://doi.org/10.14361/dcs-2018-0203
Madsen, C. Ø., Lindgren, I., & Melin, U. (2022). The accidental caseworker: How digital self-service-influences citizens’ administrative burden. Government Information Quarterly, 39(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101653
Miles, B. M., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis. A Methods Sourcebook. (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
Nirmalarajan, L. Y. (2023). Mellem nærhed og distance i participatorisk praksisforskning - metodologiske refleksioner over fælles vidensproduktion med brugere [Between closeness and distance in participatory practice research: Methodological reflections of shared knowledge production with service users]. Forskning I Pædagogers Profession Og Uddannelse, 7(2), 9. https://doi.org/10.7146/fppu.v7i2.141834
Nirmalarajan, L. Y., & Hansen, R. S. (2024). Forskning til støtte for demokratiske fællesskaber gennem fremtidsværksteder [Research Supporting Democratic Communities Through Future Workshops]. Psyke & Logos, 45(2), 73–91. https://doi.org/10.7146/pl.v45i2.152013
Nirmalarajan, L. Y., & Høybye-Mortensen, M. (2023). “Hvordan inddrages udsatte familier i den digitale forvaltning?” [“How are vulnerable families included in Digital Governance?”], Uden for Nummer: Tidsskrift for forskning og praksis i socialt arbejde, 22(46), 28-37.
Nygaard-Christensen, M., & Gamsgaard, J. T. (2023). Ulighed i velfærdssamfundet: det kræver overskud for de mest udsatte mennesker at få den rette hjælp [Inequality in the Welfare State: The Most Vulnerable Need Resources to Access the Right Help]. STOF - Viden om rusmidler og samfund, 45, 8-13.
Ragnedda, M. (2020). Enhancing Digital Equity: Connecting the Digital Underclass?. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49079-9
Schou, J., & Pors, A. S. (2019). Digital by default? A qualitative study of exclusion in digitalised welfare. Social Policy & Administration, 53(3), 464-477. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12470
Star, S. L., & Strauss, A. (1999). Layers of silence, arenas of voice: The ecology of visible and invisible work. Computer supported cooperative work (CSCW), 8, 9-30. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008651105359
Villeséche, F., Muhr, S. L., & Śliwa, M. (2018). From radical black feminism to postfeminist hashtags: Re-claiming intersectionality. Ephemera: Theory & Politics in Organization, 18(1): 1-16.
Villumsen, A.M., & Strandby, M. W. (2023) Forældreinddragelse i myndighedssagsbehandling [Parental involvement in administrative casework]. VIVE. https://www.vive.dk/da/udgivelser/foraeldreinddragelse-i-myndighedssagsbehandling-yvreokxb/
Yuval-Davis, N. (2011). The Politics of Belonging: Intersectional Contestations. Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446251041
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Liesanth Yde Nirmalarajan

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Publications in Women, Gender and Research are licensed under Creative Commons License: CC Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0