The primary task on the agenda
constructive or confused dialogues
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/tfa.v19i1.109079Abstract
The article addresses an increasing popular term within the Danish field of psychosocial working environment; the primary task. Among working environment professionals the primary task is especially connected to the organizational social capital, and a shared perception of the primary task among organizational members is pin pointed as a way to increased social capital. Thus, organizations are offered different methods and guidelines to generate dialogue among its members concerning their different perceptions of their primary task. The goal is to create shared perceptions of the primary task and thereby enhance the collaboration capacity and the social capital. The article examines, which kind of reflections and negotiations unfolds in a dialogue among personnel concerning their primary task. The theoretical frame consists of sensemaking-literature and new institutional theory concerning the travelling of ideas and trends. The empirical material comes from a series of seminars on social capital with daycare personnel from different daycare institutions in the municipality of Copenhagen. As a part of the seminars, the participants are introduced to ‘the primary task’ in a presentation from an outside consultant. They are also asked to reflect on their different perceptions of the primary task and to negotiate a shared definition. The analysis finds that the conceptualization of the primary task on these specific seminars has several limitations. Firstly, the dialogue concerning the primary task is too abstract and unconnected to the daycare personnel’s everyday work practice. Consequently, the seminars do only to a small ex-tent initiate reflections on the participant’s different theories of action. Secondly, the definition of the term ‘primary task’ seems unclear, especially regarding the employee’s mandate to define the primary task. Consequently, the participants shared definition of the primary task seems unrelated to what they had highlighted earlier in the process as important in work.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Forfattere, der publicerer deres værker via dette tidsskrift, accepterer følgende vilkår:
- Forfattere bevarer deres ophavsret og giver tidsskriftet ret til første publicering, samtidigt med at værket ét år efter publiceringen er omfattet af en Creative Commons Attribution-licens, der giver andre ret til at dele værket med en anerkendelse af værkets forfatter og første publicering i nærværende tidsskrift.
- Forfattere kan indgå flere separate kontraktlige aftaler om ikke-eksklusiv distribution af tidsskriftets publicerede version af værket (f.eks. sende det til et institutionslager eller udgive det i en bog), med en anerkendelse af værkets første publicering i nærværende tidsskrift.
- Forfattere har ret til og opfordres til at publicere deres værker online (f.eks. i institutionslagre eller på deres websted) forud for og under manuskriptprocessen, da dette kan føre til produktive udvekslinger, samt tidligere og større citater fra publicerede værker (se The Effect of Open Access).