Deliberative Democracy, Critical Thinking, and the Deliberating Individual: empirical challenges to the reasonability of the citizen
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/spf.v4i1.18314Keywords:
Deliberative democracy, critical thinking, reasoningAbstract
In this essay, I first discuss the conditions set by theorists of democratic deliberation on proper deliberation. These conditions call for reasoned decisions from mutually acceptable premises. Next, I present the ideal of critical thinking that should guide the citizen in this deliberation. I then examine the empirical literature on human reasoning. Some research results in the empirical literature paint a bleak picture of human rationality: we fall victim to heuristics and biases, persevere in our beliefs in the face of contrary evidence, and justify our moral judgments by post hoc-reasoning. In addition, the deliberating groups have problems of their own. The groups may, for example, amplify errors or fall victim to information cascades. Though these epistemically detrimental processes can be overcome, they do present a challenge to our rationality. The essay concludes by arguing that the empirical evidence in fact supports an internalistic approach to group deliberation, a claim challenged by Solomon (2006).Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The author(s) and the journal share the Copyright, and must both be credited when using (e.g. quoting from or distributing) published material. Articles published in Studier i Pædagogisk Filosofi (Studies in Philosophy of Education) may be used (downloaded) and reused (distributed, copied, cited) for non-commercial purposes with reference to the authors and publication host. Manuscripts submitted to Studier i Pædagogisk Filosofi may not have been previosly published - however, Studier i Pædagogisk Filosofi does allow for its published articles to be published in other journals by the author, after approval from the editors. Articles may be uploaded in institutional repositories if the author is required to so as part of a grant or institutional requirement.