Teori-praksis-distinktionen og pædagogisk filosofi
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/spf.v2i2.15447Keywords:
Teori, anvendt filosofi, praksis, Carr, Hirst, post-foundationalisme, Aristoteles, Gadamer, overskridelse, negativitetAbstract
Educational philosopher Wilfred Carr claims that the formation of philosophy of education in accordance with the theory-centered paradigm of modernist philosophy is responsible for the miserable fact that educational practitioners take no interest in philosophy of education. A real contemporary philosophy of education, Carr suggests, would give up theory and the “foundationalist” idea of seeking a firm ground for practice outside of practice. The paper, firstly, takes up Carr’s debate with Paul Hirst on Carr’s notion of philosophy of education, and, secondly, moves on to inquire the interpretation of Aristotle’s practical philosophy by Hans-Georg Gadamer, whom Carr refers to. Finally, the paper outlines some merits of Gadamer’s hermeneutics that philosophy of education should adaptDownloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The author(s) and the journal share the Copyright, and must both be credited when using (e.g. quoting from or distributing) published material. Articles published in Studier i Pædagogisk Filosofi (Studies in Philosophy of Education) may be used (downloaded) and reused (distributed, copied, cited) for non-commercial purposes with reference to the authors and publication host. Manuscripts submitted to Studier i Pædagogisk Filosofi may not have been previosly published - however, Studier i Pædagogisk Filosofi does allow for its published articles to be published in other journals by the author, after approval from the editors. Articles may be uploaded in institutional repositories if the author is required to so as part of a grant or institutional requirement.