Wild animals connect us with nature

About awe and ecopedagogy

Authors

  • Theresa Schilhab
  • Gertrud Lynge Esbensen

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7146/pl.v44i2.151595

Keywords:

wild animals, informal learning, connectedness with nature, ecopedagogy, ecocentrism

Abstract

In recent years, children’s experiences with nature have been connected to their understanding of sustainability. According to the research, positive nature experiences and the experience of being part of nature lead to caring for it. The care motivates to act sustainably, a relationship described by ‘connectedness with nature’.
However, the research literature often refers to nature as a green (or blue) area, i.e. a place that, unlike urban areas, has properties that stimulate positive experiences of nature. The connection between experiences with wild animals in nature (invertebrates, like snails and spiders, and vertebrates, like mammals and amphibians) and positive nature experiences is not covered. Therefore, in their capacity of being creatures with their own goals, we lack insight into whether wild animals stimulate the experience of being part of nature and sustainable behaviours. The underlying assumption is that animals are easy to feel connected to and care for because they exhibit behaviour that shares similarities with our own that might stimulate interest and lead to a budding understanding. This essay offers an initial theoretical framework for how children’s experiences of wild animals influence their opportunities to develop the nature association. The essay unfolds how observations of wild animals and their purposefulness in their natural environment potentially stimulate emotions and cognition. We point to three effects, namely 1) Stimulation of curiosity
through animal sensation and action, 2) Insight into the diversity of nature through the recognisable and yet different behaviour of animals and 3) Dependence on the specific environment. We end by discussing the effects of the experiences concerning children’s connection to nature and understanding of sustainability.

References

Amel, E., Manning, C., Scott, B. & Koger, S. (2017). Beyond the roots of human inaction: Fostering collective effort toward ecosystem conservation. Science 356(6335), 275-279.

Amoruso, L. & Urgesi, C. (2016). Familiarity modulates motor activation while other species’ actions are observed: a magnetic stimulation study. European Journal of Neuroscience 43(6), 765-772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.03.060

Atran, S., Medin, D. & Ross, N. (2004). Evolution and devolution of knowledge: A tale of two biologies. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 10(2), 395-420. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9655.2004.00195.x

Bai, Y., Ocampo, J., Jin, G., Chen, S., Benet-Martinez, V., Monroy, M., Anderson, C. & Keltner, D. (2021). Awe, daily stress, and elevated life satisfaction. Journal of personality and social psychology 120(4), 837. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000267

Balling, G., Schilhab, T. & Esbensen, G. L. (2022). Technology, participation and bodilyin teractions in nature: The potential of mobile technology in situated learning. Conjunctions 9(2), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.2478/tjcp-2022-0010

Blume, M. (2015). ”Ah, oh, nejjjj!” om eksperimentelle processer i æstetisk pædagogisk praksis. Nordic Early Childhood Education Research Journal 9(2), 1-19.

Borgi, M. & Cirulli, F. (2016). Pet face: Mechanisms underlying human-animal relationships. Frontiers in psychology 7, 298. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00298

Broch, H. B. (2004). Barndommens grønne dal. Om betydningen av barns naturopplevelser. Norsk antropologisk tidsskrift 15(1-2), 101-113. https://doi.org/10.18261/issn1504-2898-2004-01-02-10

Burke, M., Kuzmičová, A., Mangen, A. & Schilhab, T. (2016). Empathy at the confluence of neuroscience and empirical literary studies. Scientific Study of Literature, 6(1), 6-41. https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.6.1.03bur

Chawla, L. (2007). Childhood experiences associated with care for the natural world: A theoretical framework for empirical results. Children Youth and Environments, 17(4), 144-170. https://doi.org/10.1353/cye.2007.0010

Dankiw, K. A., Kumar, S., Baldock, K. L. & Tsiros, M. D. (2023). Parent and early childhood educator perspectives of unstructured nature play for young children: A qualitative descriptive study. Plos one 18(6). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0286468

De Graaf, A., Hoeken, H., Sanders, J. & Beentjes, J. W. (2012). Identification as a mechanism of narrative persuasion. Communication research 39(6), 802-823. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650211408594

Dennett, D. C. (1996). Kinds of Minds. BasicsBooks.

De Waal, F. B. (1999). Anthropomorphism and anthropodenial: consistency in our thinking about humans and other animals. hilosophical topics 27(1), 255-280. https://doi.org/10.5840/philtopics199927122

Driessnack, M. (2009). Children and nature-deficit disorder. Journal for Specialists in Pediatric Nursing 14(1), 73. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6155.2009.00180.x

Drissner, J., Haase, H. M. & Hille, K. (2010). Short-term environmental education-does it work?-An evaluation of the ‘green classroom’. Journal of Biological Education 44(4), 149-155. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2010.9656215

Drissner, J. R., Haase, H. M., Wittig, S. & Hille, K. (2014). Short-term environmental education: long-term effectiveness? Journal of Biological Education, 48(1), 9-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2013.799079

Eddy, T. J., Gallup Jr, G. G. & Povinelli, D. J. (1993). Attribution of cognitive states to animals: Anthropomorphism in comparative perspective. Journal of Social Issues 49(1), 87-101. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1993.tb00910.x

Epley, N., Waytz, A. & Cacioppo, J. T. (2007). On seeing human: a three-factor theory of anthropomorphism. Psychological review 114(4), 864-886. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.114.4.864

Ernst, J., McAllister, K., Siklander, P. & Storli, R. (2021). Contributions to sustainability through young children’s nature play: A systematic review. Sustainability 13(13), 7443. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13137443

https://foedevarestyrelsen.dk/dyr/om-dyr-og-kaeledyr-til-private/alt-om-kaeledyr/valgaf-kaeledyr/forbudte-dyr

Gallup Jr, G. G. (1970). Chimpanzees: self-recognition. Science 167(3914), 86-87. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.167.3914.86

Gifford, R. & Nilsson, A. (2014). Personal and social factors that influence proenvironmental concern and behaviour: A review. International journal of psychology 49(3), 141-157. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12034

Gjerris, M. (2019). Upraktisk håndbog i lysegrønt håb (s. 17-70). Bibelselskabets Forlag.

Godfrey-Smith, P. (2002). Environmental complexity and the evolution of cognition. I The evolution of intelligence (s. 233-249). https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/1885.003.0021

Hasse, C. (2016). Anthropology of learning. Springer.

Heider, F. & Simmel, M. (1944). An experimental study of apparent behavior. The American journal of psychology 57(2), 243-259. https://doi.org/10.2307/1416950

Hicks, D. (2018). Why we still need a geography of hope. Geography 103(2), 78-85. https://doi.org/10.1080/00167487.2018.12094041

Hinds, J. & Sparks, P. (2008). Engaging with the natural environment: The role of affective connection and identity. Journal of nvironmental psychology 28(2), 109-120.

Horowitz, A. C. & Bekoff, M. (2007). Naturalizing anthropomorphism: Behavioral prompts to our humanizing of animals. Anthrozoös 20(1), 23-35. https://doi.org/10.2752/089279307780216650

Hughes, J., Rogerson, M., Barton, J. & Bragg, R. (2019). Age and connection to nature: when is engagement critical? Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 17(5), 265-269. https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.2035

Jensen, E. (2014). Evaluating children’s conservation biology learning at the zoo. Conservation Biology 28(4), 1004-1011.

Jensen, E. A., Moss, A. & Gusset, M. (2017). Quantifying long term impact of zoo and aquarium visits on biodiversity related learning outcomes. Zoo biology 36(4), 294-297.

Keltner, D. (2023). Awe: the transformative power of everyday wonder. Random House.

Keltner, D. & Haidt, J. (2003). Approaching awe, a moral, spiritual, and aesthetic emotion. Cognition and Emotion 17(2), 297-314. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930302297

Kossack, A. & Bogner, F. X. (2012). How does a one-day environmental education programme support individual connectedness with nature? Journal of Biological Education 46(3), 180-187. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2011.634016

Lumber, R., Richardson, M. & Sheffield, D. (2017). Beyond knowing nature: Contact, emotion, compassion, meaning, and beauty are pathways to nature connection. PLoS one 12(5), e0177186. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0177186

Maturana, H. R. & Varela, F. J. (1998). The tree of knowledge. The biological roots of human understanding. Shambala.

McBride, B. B. & Brewer, C. A. (2010). NATURE’S Palette. Science and Children 48(2), 40-43.

Mitchell, R. W. & Hamm, M. (1997). The interpretation of animal psychology: anthropomorphism or behavior reading? Behaviour 134(3-4), 173-204. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853997x00449

Nietzsche, F. (1979/1873). On Truth and Lies in a Nonmoral Sense. I D. Breazeals (red. og overs.), Philosophy and Truth: Selections from Nietzsche’s Notebooks of the Early 1870s (s. 79-91). Humanities Press.

Paludan, K. (2000). Videnskaben, verden og vi: om naturvidenskab og hverdagstænkning. Aarhus Universitetsforlag.

Prokop, P., Prokop, M. & Tunnicliffe, S. D. (2008). Effects of keeping animals as pets on children’s concepts of vertebrates and invertebrates. International Journal of Science Education, 30(4), 431-449. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701206686

Restall, B. & Conrad, E. (2015). A literature review of connectedness to nature and its potential for environmental management. Journal of environmental management 159, 264-278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.05.022

Rowlands, M. (2009). The philosopher and the wolf: Lessons from the wild on love, death and happiness. Granta Books.

Rowlands, M. (2013). Running with the Pack. Open Road Media.

Schilhab, T. S. (2002). Anthropomorphism and mental state attribution. Animal Behaviour 63(5), 1021-1026. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/anbe.2002.2001

Schilhab, T. S. (2004). What mirror self-recognition in nonhumans can tell us about aspects of self. Biology and Philosophy 19, 111-126. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/B:BIPH.0000013249.23475.1f

Schilhab, T. (2017). Derived embodiment in abstract language. Springer.

Schilhab, T. (2021, december). Nature experiences in science education in school: Review featuring learning gains, investments, and costs in view of embodied cognition. Frontiers in Education 6, 739408). Frontiers Media SA. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.739408

Schilhab, T. (2023a). Naturdigte. Dansklærerforeningens Forlag.

Schilhab, T. (2023b). Lærervejledning. Dansklærerforeningens Forlag.

Schilhab, T. & Esbensen, G. L. (2019). Socio-cultural influences on situated cognition in nature. Frontiers in psychology, 10, 980. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00980

Schilhab, T., Esbensen, G. L. & Crety, C. (2022). Fire I tilgangen: en embodied cognitionteori om læring. I J. Bjerre & P. Fibæk Laursen (red.), Pædagogikhåndbogen: seks tilgange til pædagogik (2. udgave red.). Hans Reitzels Forlag.

Schultz, P. W. (2000). New environmental theories: Empathizing with nature: The effects of Perspective taking on concern for environmental issues. Journal of social issues 56(3), 391-406. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00174

Schultz, P. W. (2002). Inclusion with nature: The psychology of human-nature relations. I Psychology of sustainable development (s. 61-78). Springer US.

Sheets-Johnstone, M. (1998). Consciousness: A natural history. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 5(3), 260-294.

Sheets-Johnstone, M. (2023). The importance of evolution to understandings of human nature. Brill.

Skar, M., Gundersen, V. & O’Brien, L. (2016). How to engage children with nature: why not just let them play? Children’s Geographies 14(5), 527-540. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733285.2015.1136734

Snaddon, J. L., Turner, E. C. & Foster, W. A. (2008). Children’s perceptions of rainforest biodiversity: which animals have the lion’s share of environmental awareness? PLoS One 3(7), e2579. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0002579

Soga, M. & Gaston, K. J. (2016). Extinction of experience: the loss of human–nature interactions. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 14(2), 94-101. https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.1225

Sood, A. & Jones, D. T. (2013). On mind wandering, attention, brain networks, and meditation.

Explore, 9(3), 136-141.

Strommen, E. (1995). Lions and tigers and bears, oh my! Children’s conceptions of forests and their inhabitants. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 32(7), 683-698. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660320704

Ulrich, R. S., Simons, R. F., Losito, B. D., Fiorito, E., Miles, M. A. & Zelson, M. (1991). Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. Journal of environmental psychology 11(3), 201-230. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0272-4944(05)80184-7

Unsworth, S. J., Levin, W., Bang, M., Washinawatok, K., Waxman, S. R. & Medin, D. L. (2012). Cultural differences in children’s ecological reasoning and psychological closeness to nature: Evidence from Menominee and European American children. Journal of Cognition and Culture 12(1-2), 17-29. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853712x633901

Urquiza-Haas, E. G. & Kotrschal, K. (2015). The mind behind anthropomorphic thinking: Attribution of mental states to other species. Animal Behaviour 109, 167-176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2015.08.011

Varella, M. A. C. (2018). The biology and evolution of the three psychological tendencies to anthropomorphize biology and evolution. Frontiers in Psychology 9, 1839. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01839

White, N. C., Reid, C. & Welsh, T. N. (2014). Responses of the human motor system to observing actions across species: A transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Brain and cognition 92, 11-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2014.10.004

Downloads

Published

2023-12-31

How to Cite

Schilhab, T., & Lynge Esbensen, G. (2023). Wild animals connect us with nature: About awe and ecopedagogy. Psyke & Logos, 44(2), 109–130. https://doi.org/10.7146/pl.v44i2.151595