Lacans psykoanalytiske 'æstetik'
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/pl.v14i2.135881Abstract
Although Lacan declares himself Freudian, his ideas about art and the aesthetic domaine are quite different from Freud's. Lacan does not consider art as a formation of the uncoMcious, but as a symptom which in some way is non-interpretable and
which can not be lead automatically back to the artist or the possible persons in the work of art. That does not mean that art can not be interpreted, but that this is not possible as an Lacanian psychoanalysis of the work of art. Therefore is it necessary
to introduce a 'monster' theory which can explain human-like phenomenon in art and which is supported by Lacan's psychoanalytic theory. By beginning with a discussion on Freud's and Lacan's differents view points conceming sublimation, the article
presents and discusses these perspectives regarding a possible Lacanian aesthetics.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Ophavsret er tidsskriftets og forfatternes. Det er gældende praksis, at artikler publiceret i Psyke & Logos, som efterfølgende oversættes til andet sprog, af forfatteren frit kan publiceres i internationale tidsskrifter, dog således at det ved reference fremgår, at den oversatte artikel har et forlæg i en dansksproget version i Psyke & Logos. Artikler kan frit deles og linkes til på forsknings- og undervisningsnetværk (så som Blackboard). Link foretrækkes, fordi det giver oplysning om brug af tidsskriftets artikler.
