Nøgleord
lærerudvikling
Faglig sparring
Grund
Citation/Eksport
Resumé
Hvordan kan kollegial faglig sparring finde sted i forbindelse med konkret undervisning –helst nemt og billigt? I artiklen rapporteres der fra et forskningsprojekt om matematiske pointer hvorlærere er søgt støttet i deres planlægning gennem e-mailkorrespondance med én kollega eller gennemfælles planlægning af særlige lektioner, dvs. ved såkaldte lektionsstudier (lesson study) i grupper på optil seks lærere. Begge interventioner viste at lærere værdsætter en målrettet kollegial faglig sparring,og at effekten kan være betydelig for lærernes kommunikation i klassen.How can peer professional coaching take place in the context of actual teaching – preferably cheapand easy? In this article I report on a research project on mathematical points in which teachers werehelped in their planning by e-mail correspondence with one colleague or through joint planning ofspecific lessons, i.e. by so-called lesson study in groups of up to six teachers. Both interventions showedthat teachers appreciate a focused peer professional coaching, and that the effect can be significanton teachers’ communication in the classroom.Referencer
Bilsted, E. (2010). Lektionsstudier i matematikundervisningen. En præsentation af syv superlektioner. København: Forlaget Navimat. Lokaliseret den 20. oktober 2012 på www.e-pages.dk/bording/5.
Isoda, M., Stephens, M., Ohara, Y. & Miyakawa, T. (2007). Japanese Lesson Study in Mathematics. Its Impact, Diversity and Potential for Educational Improvement. Singapore: World Scientific.
Lewis, C. & Hurd, J. (2011). Lesson Study Step by Step. How Learning Communities Improve Instruction. Portsmouth: Heinemann.
Lewis, C. (2002). Lesson Study. A Handbook of Teacher-Led Instructional Change. Philadelphia: RBS.
Makinae, N. (2010). The Origin of Japan’s Lesson Study and Transition in Instruction. Journal of Japan Society of Mathematical Education. Special Issue (EARCOME 5), s.2‑3.
Miyakawa, T. & Winsløw, C. (2009). Un dispositif japonais pour le travail en équipe d’enseignants: Etude collective d’une leçon. Éducation et Didactique, 1(3), s. 77‑90.
Mogensen, A. (2009). Lesson study i Danmark? MONA, 2009(2), s. 79‑85.
Mogensen, A. (2011). Point-Driven Mathematics Teaching. Studying and Intervening in Danish Classrooms. Ph.d.-afhandling. Roskilde Universitet: IMFUFA. Lokaliseret den 20. oktober 2012 på http://kommat.dk/uploads/download/dansk_fd/Arne%20Mogensen%20Ph%20D.pdf.
Mogensen, A. (2012). Når pointer styrer matematikundervisning. MONA, 2012(3), s. 40‑54.
Niss, M., Andreasen, M., Foss Hansen, K., Matthiasen, J., Mogensen, A., Skånstrøm, M. & Holm, C. (2006). Fremtidens matematik i folkeskolen. København: Undervisningsministeriet.
Ostermeier, C., Prenzel, M. & Duit, R. (2010). Improving Science and Mathematics Instruction – The SINUS-project as an Example for Reform as Teacher Professional Development. International Journal of Science Education, 32(3), s. 303‑327.
Stepanek, J., Appel, G., Leong, M., Mangan M.T. & Mitchell, M. (2007). Leading Lesson Study. A Practical Guide for Teachers and Facilitators. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.
Stigler, J. & Hiebert, J. (1999). The Teaching Gap. Best Ideas from the World’s Teachers for Improving Education in the Classroom. New York: The Free Press.
Van Bommel, J. (2012). Improving Teaching, Improving Learning, Improving as a Teacher. Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching as an Object of Learning. Ph.d.-afhandling. Karlstad Universitet, Sverige. Lokaliseret den 20. oktober 2012 på http://kau.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2:531248.
Winsløw, C. (2009). Et mysterium om tal – og japanske lektionsstudier. MONA, 2009(1), s. 31‑43.
Dette værk er under følgende licens Creative Commons Navngivelse –Ikke-kommerciel (by-nc).
Copyright (c) 2016 MONA - Matematik- og Naturfagsdidaktik