Motivstudier. Kontinuitet og fornyelse i ornamentale hybridformer fra antikken til ca. 1600

  • Maria Fabricius Hansen Københavns Universitet
Nøgleord: kunsthistorie, billedkunst, grotesker, kontinuitet, transformation

Resumé

Representations of hybrids of human figures, plants, and animals were prolific in all media in sixteenth-century Italian art. The motif is known back from Greek and Roman antiquity, both in poetry and visual art, which the artists of the sixteenth century – or the renaissance – claimed to revive. Yet the representations of hybrids from these two periods within the history of art differ remarkably. And at the same time they belong to an iconographic tradition that did not disappear in the medieval period, an observation which blurs the picture of these ornaments as rediscovered and revived in the renaissance.
How then do motifs such as foliate heads or other phyto- or zoomorph creatures develop in visual art from antiquity to ca. 1600?
The topological method can be applied to a tracking of these motifs over time in order to stress continuity and analyze the transformations which took place through the centuries.
This article reflects on some methodological and historiographical aspects of studies of motifs in art history. In a double-sided strategy it both aims at challenging the persistent notion of the renaissance as a period rejecting the middle ages and reviving antiquity (i.e. it stresses the continuity of the sixteenth century with the preceding centuries); and it suggest some characteristics of the visual paradigm of sixteenth-century Italian art (i.e. it describes some of the innovations of the period).

Forfatterbiografi

Maria Fabricius Hansen, Københavns Universitet

Maria Fabricius Hansen er dr.phil. og lektor i kunsthistorie ved Institut for Kunst- og Kulturvidenskab, Københavns Universitet. Hendes aktuelle forskning omhandler det 16. århundredes italienske kunst og arkitektur, men hun beskæftiger sig i sin forskning og undervisning også med samtidskunst og -arkitektur.

Referencer

Aristotle. Physics. Overs. F.M. Cornford. Cambridge, Massachusetts & London: Harvard University Press, 1957.

Baltrusaitis, Jurgis. Le Moyen Age Fantastique: Antiquitès et exotismes dans l’art gothique. Paris: Armand Colin, 1955.

Bernard de Clairvaux, i red. Caecilia Davis-Weyer. Early Medieval Art 300-1150: Sources and Documents. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1986. 168-170.

Bredekamp, Horst. Antikensehnsucht und Maschinenglaube: Die Geschichte der Kunstkammer und die Zukunft der Kunstgeschichte. Berlin: Klaus Wagenbach, (1993) 2002.

Brown, Peter. The Body and Society: Men, Women, and Sexual Renunciation in Early Christianity. New York: Columbia University Press, 1988.

Bynum, Caroline Walker. Metamorphosis and Identity. New York: Zone Books 2005.

Cennini, Cennino. Bogen om malerkunsten. Overs. Hannemarie Ragn Jensen. København: Nyt Nordisk Forlag Arnold Busck, 1996.

Colie, Rosalie L. Paradoxia Epidemica: The Renaissance Tradition of Paradox. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1966.

Curtius, Ernst Robert. European Literature and the Latin Middle Ages. Overs. Willard R. Trask, Bollingen Series XXXVI. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, (1953) 2013.

Curtius, Ludwig. ”Die Rankengöttin: Ein Vortrag” (1951). Torso: Verstreute und Nachgelassene Schriften. Red. Joachim Moras. Stuttgart: Deutsche Verlags-Anstalt, 1957. 192-210.

Dacos, Nicole. La Découverte de la Domus Aurea et la formation des grotesques a la renaissance. London: The Warburg Institute, 1969.

Della Porta, Giambattista. De humana physiognomonia l libri IIII. Vici Aequensis: 1586.

Didi-Huberman, Georges. Atlas ou le gai savoir inquiet (L’Oeil de l’histoire, 3). Les Éditions de Minuit: Lonrai, 2011.

Didi-Huberman, Georges. ”Nachleben, ou l’anthropologie du temps: Warburg avec Tylor” og ”Renaissance et impureté du temps: Warburg avec Burckhardt”. L’Image Survivante: Histoire de l’Art et Temps des Fantômes selon Aby Warburg. Les Éditions de Minuit: Lonrai 2002. 51-60 og 71-81.

Elsner, Jas. Imperial Rome and Christian Triumph: The Art of the Roman Empire A.D. 100–450. (Oxford History of Art). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.

Elsner, Jas. Art and the Roman Viewer: The Transformation of Art from the Pagan World to Christianity. Cambridge, New York & Melbourne: Cambridge University Press, 1995.

Focillon, Henri. The Life of Forms in Art. Overs. Charles Beecher Hogan & George Kubler. New York: Wittenborn, Schultz (1934) 1948.

Foucault, Michel. Ordene og tingene: En arkæologisk undersøgelse af videnskaberne om mennesket. Overs. Chr. Svendsen. Spektrum, Viborg, (1966) 1999.

Freedberg, David. The Eye of the Lynx: Galileo, his friends, and the beginnings of modern natural history. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, 2002.

Gombrich, Ernst H. The Sense of Order: A Study in the Psychology of Decorative Art. London: Phaidon, 1979.

Horats, Horace. Ars Poetica, i Horace: Satires, Epistles and Ars Poetica. Overs. H. Rushton Fairclough. Cambridge, Mass. & London: Harvard University Press, 1970.

Jacobs, Fredrika. ”(Dis)assembling. Marsyas, Michelangelo, and the Accademia del Disegno”. Art Bulletin, 86 3 (2002): 426-448.

Janson, H.W. ”The Image Made by Chance in Renaissance Thought”. De artibus opuscula XL: Essays in Honor of Erwin Panofsky. Red. M. Meiss. New York: New York University Press, 1961. 254-266.

Johnson, Christopher D. Memory, Metaphor, and Aby Warburg’s Atlas of Images. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press & Cornell University Library, 2012.

Nagel, Alexander. ”Leonardo and Sfumato.”Res 24, autumn (1993): 7-20.

Nagel, Alexander & Christopher S. Wood. Anachronic Renaissance. New York: Zone Books, 2010.

Panofsky, Erwin. Die Perspektive als symbolische Form: Vorträge der Bibliothek Warburg 1924-1925. Leipzig & Berlin: Teubner, 1927.

Panofsky, Erwin. Renaissance and Renascences in Western Art. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell, 1960.

Pictor in Carmine. Ein Handbuch der Typologie aus der Zeit um 1200. Nach MS 300 des Corpus Christi College in Cambridge. Red. Karl-August Wirth. Berlin: Gebr. Mann Verlag, 2006.

Plinius den Ældre: Pliny. Natural History. Overs. H. Rackham & D.E. Eichholz. Cambridge, Massachusetts & London: Harvard University Press, 1952-62.

Riegl, Alois. Problems of Style: Foundations for a History of Ornament. Overs. Evelyn Kain, noter, ordforklaring og introduction David Castriota, forord Henri Zerner. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1992.

Riegl, Alois. Die spätrömische Kunstindustrie. Wien: Verlag der Österreichische Statsdruckerei (1901) 1927.

Rupp, Wayne L. Jr. ”The Vegetal Goddess in the Tomb of Typhon.” Etruscan Studies: Journal of the Etruscan Foundation. 10 (2007): 211-219.

Schauenburg, Konrad. ”Zur Symbolik unteritalienischen Rankenmotive,” Mitteilungen des deutschen archaeologischen Instituts Roemische Abteilung. 64 (1957): 198-221.

Shearman, John. ”Leonardo’s Color and Chiaroscuro.” Sixteenth-Century Italian Art. Red. Michael W. Cole. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2006. 408-440.

Shearman, John. Mannerism. London & Harmondsworth: Penguin (1967) 1990.

Toynbee, J.M.C. & J.B. Ward Perkins. ”Peopled Scrolls: A Hellenistic Motif in Imperial Art.” Papers of the British School at Rome. 18 (1950): 1-43.

Vasari, Giorgio. Le Vite de’ Più eccellenti pittori scultori e architettori nelle redazioni del 1550 e 1568. Red. R. Bettarini & P. Barocchi. Firenze: Sansoni, 1966-1997.

Vitruvius. Ten Books on Architecture. Overs. Ingrid D. Rowland, komment. Thomas Noble Howe. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1999.

Wamberg, Jacob. Landscape as World Picture: Tracing Cultural Evolution in Images (vol. 1-2). Aarhus: Aarhus University Press, 2009.

Weiss, Roberto. The Renaissance Discovery of Classical Antiquity, Oxford: Blackwell, 1969.

Wölfflin, Heinrich. Die Klassische Kunst: Eine Einführung in die italienische Renaissance. Basel & Stuttgart: Schwabe & Co., (1898) 9. udg. 1968.

Wölfflin, Heinrich. Kunstgeschichtliche Grundbegriffe: Das Problem der Stilentwicklung in der neueren Kunst. München: F. Bruckmann, 1915.

Publiceret
2017-08-28
Citation/Eksport
Hansen, M. (2017). Motivstudier. Kontinuitet og fornyelse i ornamentale hybridformer fra antikken til ca. 1600. K&K - Kultur Og Klasse, 45(123), 109-134. https://doi.org/10.7146/kok.v45i123.96832
Sektion
Artikler