DUT Guide om løbende bedømmelse
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/dut.v16i31.128036Resumé
Løbende bedømmelse er en relativt ny eksamensform i Danmark, som giver mulighed for at supplere en afsluttende eksamen med bedømmelsesaktiviteter i løbet af undervisningsperioden, som tæller med i den studerendes samlede karakter. Løbende bedømmelse kan derfor blive en måde, hvorpå eksamen knyttes bedre til undervisningen og giver de studerende mere retvisende eksamenskarakterer. Med fokus på bedre uddannelse og undervisning på de videregående uddannelser vil det formentlig blive en mere udbredt eksamensform med tiden. I guiden her præsenteres praksisnære råd til undervisere og undervisningsudviklere om løbende bedømmelse baseret på forskning, danske og internationale erfaringer samt den hidtidige implementering af eksamensformen på danske videregående uddannelser.
Referencer
Andersen, H. L. & Tofteskov, J. (2016). Eksamen og eksamensformer: betydning og bedømmelse, 2. udgave. Frederiksberg: Samfundslitteratur.
Assessment Design Decisions. http://www.assessmentdecisions.org. Besøgt 9/7 2021.
Assessment Methods. https://stll.au.dk/en/resources/assessment-methods/. Besøgt 9/7 2021.
Bassey, M. (1971). The Assessment of Students by Formal Assignments. Wellington: New Zealand University Students Association.
Biggs, J. & Tang, C. (2007). Teaching for quality learning at university, 3. udgave. Maidenhead, England: Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.
Biggs, J. & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university. McGraw-hill education (UK).
Bjælde, O. E., Jørgensen, T. H. & Lindberg, A. B. (2017). Continuous assessment in higher education in Denmark: Early experiences from two science courses. Dansk Universitetspædagogisk Tidsskrift, 12(23), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.7146/dut.v12i23.25634
Bjælde, O. E. & Lindberg, A.B. (2018). Using continuous assessment with feedback loops to generate useful data for learning analytics. In M. Campbell, J. Willems, C. Adachi, D. Blake, I. Doherty, S. Krishnan, S. Macfarlane, L. Ngo, M. O'Donnell, S. Palmer, L. Riddell, I. Story, H. Suri & J. Tai (Eds.), Open Oceans: Learning without borders. Proceedings ASCILITE 2018. Geelong (53-62).
Bjælde, O. E, Lauridsen, K. M. & Lindberg, A.B. (2018). White paper on "Current trends in assessment in Europe". The Coimbra Group Education Innovation Working Group. https://www.coimbra-group.eu/white-paper-on-current-trends-in-assessment-in-europe/
Bjælde, O. E. & Najbjerg, R. B. (2017). Innovativ formidling af førsteårsstuderende som et design-based research-forløb. Læring og medier (LOM), Vol. 9, No. 16. https://doi.org/10.7146/lom.v9i16.24413
Boud, D. & Molloy, E. (2013a). Rethinking models of feedback for learning: the challenge of design, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38:6, 698-712. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2012.691462
Carless, D. (2015). Excellence in University Assessment. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315740621
Eksamensbekendtgørelsen (2020). https://www.retsinformation.dk/eli/lta/2020/22. Besøgt 9/7 2021.
Carless, D. & Boud, D. (2018). The development of student feedback literacy: enabling uptake of feedback, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43:8, 1315-1325. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354
Carless, D. (2019). Feedback loops and the longer-term: towards feedback spirals, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44:5, 705-714. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1531108
Dawson, P. (2021). Defending assessment security in a digital world: preventing e-cheating and supporting academic integrity in higher education, Taylor & Francis: Abingdon. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429324178
de la Harpe, B., Peterson, J. F., Frankham, N., Zehner, R., Neale, D., Musgrave E. and McDermott R. (2009). Assessment Focus in Studio: What is Most Prominent in Architecture, Art and Design? Journal of Art & Design Education, Vol. 28, No. 1, 37-51. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-8070.2009.01591.x
Donovan, P. (2014). Closing the feedback loop: physics undergraduates' use of feedback comments on laboratory coursework, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39:8, 1017-1029. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2014.881979
Ellis, C., (2013). Broadening the Scope and Increasing the Usefulness of Learning Analytics: The Case for Assessment Analytics. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(4), 662-664. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12028
Gibbs, G. & Lucas, L. (1997). Coursework assessment, class size and student performance:1984-94. Journal of Further and Higher Education, Vol 21, no 2, 183-192, https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877970210204
Gibbs, G. (2006). How assessment frames student learning. In C. Bryan & K Clegg (Eds.). Innovative Assessment in Higher Education (pp23-36). London: Routledge
Hattie, J. & Timperley, H. (2007). Review of Educational Research, Vol. 77, No. 1, 81-112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487
Hattie, J. (2015). The applicability of Visible Learning to higher education. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology, 1(1), 79-91. https://doi.org/10.1037/stl0000021
Heywood, J. (2000). Assessment in Higher Education. London: Jessica Kingsley.
Hunt, L., Koenders, A. & Gynnild, V. (2012). Assessing practical laboratory skills in undergraduate molecular biology courses, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 37:7, 861-874. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2011.576313
Jensen, T. W. & Jørgensen, T. H. Rubric: Videnskabelig artikel med IMRAD-struktur (Introduktion, Metode, Resultater, Analyse, Diskussion). Ikke-publiceret.
McDowell, L., Wakelin, D., Montgomery, C. & King, S. (2011) Does assessment for learning make a difference? The development of a questionnaire to explore the student response, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 36:7, 749-765. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2010.488792
McLean, A. J., Bond, C. H. & Nicholson, H. D., (2015). An anatomy of feedback: a phenomenographic investigation of undergraduate students' conceptions of feedback, Studies in Higher Education, 40:5, 921-932. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2013.855718
Newble, D., Dawson, B., Dauphinee, D., Page, G., Macdonald, M., Swanson, D., Mulholland, H., Thomson, A. & van der Vleuten, C. (1994). Guidelines for assessing clinical competence, Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 6:3, 213-220. https://doi.org/10.1080/10401339409539680
Nicol D. J. & Macfarlane‐Dick, D. (2006): Formative assessment and self‐regulated learning: a model and seven principles of good feedback practice, Studies in Higher Education, 31:2, 199-218. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572090
Raaheim, A. (2016). Eksamensrevolusjonen. Råd og tips om eksamen og alternative vurderingsformer. Oslo: Gyldendal Norsk Forlag.
Ramsden, P. (2003). Learning to teach in higher education, 2. udgave. London: Routledge/Falmer. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203507711
Richardson, J.T.E. (2015). Coursework versus examinations in end-of-module assessment: a literature review, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, Vol 40, No. 3, 439-455. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2014.919628
Sambell, Kay, Liz McDowell and Catherine Montgomery (2013). Assessment for Learning in Higher Education. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203818268
Schneider, M. & Preckel, F. (2017). Variables associated with achievement in higher education: A systematic review of meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 143(6), 565-600. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000098
Simonsmeier, B.A., Peiffer, H., Flaig, M. & Schneider, M. (2020). Peer Feedback Improves Students' Academic Self‑Concept in Higher Education. Research in Higher Education,61:706-724. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-020-09591-y
ten Cate, O., Carraccio, C., Damodaran, A., Gofton, W., Hamstra, S.J., Hart, D.E., Richardson, D., Ross, S., Schultz, K., Warm, E.J, Whelan, A.J. and Schumacher, D.J, (2021) Entrustment Decision Making: Extending Miller's Pyramid. Academic Medicine, Vol. 96, No. 2, 199-204. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000003800
Trotter, E. (2006). Student perceptions of continuous summative assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, Volume 31, 2006 - Issue 5. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930600679506
Universitetsuddannelser til fremtiden (2018). Udvalg om bedre universitetsuddannelser - Uddannelses- og Forskningsministeriet. https://ufm.dk/publikationer/2018/universitetsuddannelser-til-fremtiden. Besøgt 9/7 2021.
Winstone, N. & Boud, D. (2019). Exploring cultures of feedback practice: the adoption of learning-focused feedback practices in the UK and Australia, Higher Education Research & Development, 38:2, 411-425. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2018.1532985
Winstone, N. & Carless, D. (2020). Designing effective feedback processes in higher education. A learning-focused approach. Routledge: Abingdon. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351115940
Downloads
Publiceret
Citation/Eksport
Nummer
Sektion
Licens
DUT udkommer elektronisk via Statsbibliotekets Open Journal System (Tidsskrift.dk) og DUNs hjemmeside (DUN-net.dk) forår og efterår. Det er gratis og frit tilgængeligt at læse og downloade artikler fra tidsskriftet.
Det er ikke muligt at abonnere på Dansk Universitetspædagogisk Tidsskrift, DUT, men hvis du er medlem af DUN, får du tilsendt en nyhedsmail med link til udgivelsen, når den nyeste udgave er online. Linket vil også være tilgængeligt her på siden, så snart tidsskriftet er publiceret.
© Copyright
Artikler publiseret i Dansk Universitetspædagogisk Tidsskrift, DUT, må bruges (downloades) og genbruges (distribueres, kopieres, citeres) til ikke-kommercielle formål med reference til forfattere og Dansk Universitetspædagogisk Tidsskrift.
Artikler indsendt til Dansk Universitetspædagogisk Tidsskrift må ikke publiseres i andre tidskrifter.
Betingelser
Artikler i Dansk Universitetspædagogisk Tidsskrift, DUT, er omfattet af ophavsretsloven, og der må citeres fra dem.
Følgende betingelser skal dog være opfyldt:
- Citatet skal være i overensstemmelse med „god skik“
- Der må kun citeres „i det omfang, som betinges af formålet“
- Ophavsmanden til teksten skal krediteres, og kilden skal angives ift. ovenstående bibliografiske oplysninger.
