Interrogating disability and prosthesis through the conceptual framework of NEODISABILITY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/kkf.v31i2.127879Nøgleord:
Dis/ability, ableism, dis-ing, neoliberalism, biopolitics, psychopoliticsResumé
This article investigates the emerging field of critical disability studies in order to explore understandings of disability and prosthesis through the intersection of dis/ability studies, studies in ableism, and philosophical enquiries into the biopolitics of disability and neoliberal psychopolitics. We present the interpretation that contemporary Western ableism is confi gured by neoliberal arrangements operating on the individual in ongoing processes of self-improvement. People who fail in the achievement society see themselves as being responsible for their own situation, blaming themselves as individuals instead of questioning the ableism that organises contemporary societal orderings in the neoliberal production of inferiority. We offer a conceptual framework of neodisability by unfolding internalised disabling processes in which the bifurcation of ‘dis’ and ‘ability’ operates through the forward-slash in dis/ability. The forward-slash captivates the optimistic cruelty in the workings of contemporary ableism in search of excellence through prosthetic confi gurations in an achievement economy: desiring the invisible prosthesis of willpower in the constant pursuit of overcoming the ‘dis/’. Neodisability engenders contemporary psycho-neoliberal-ableism, with people turning their aggressions against themselves in never-ending processes of dis-ing parts of themselves as ‘notfit-enough’, while being in constant need of therapeutic interventions to employ and promote the self-optimising efforts in times of neodisableism.
Referencer
Berlant, L. 2011. Cruel Optimism. London: Duke University Press.
Boutang, Y.M. 2008. Cognitive Capitalism. English edition 2011. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Braidotti, R. 2006. Posthuman, All Too Human: Towards a New Process Ontology. Theory Culture Society 23(7–8), 197–208. DOI: 10.1177/0263276406069232.
Braidotti, R. 2013. The Posthuman. London: Polity Press.
Braidotti, R. 2018. Posthuman Critical Theory. In: Braidotti, R. and Hlavajova, M. eds. Posthuman Glossary, 339–42. London: Bloomsbury.
Campbell, F.A.K. 2001. Inciting Legal Fictions. ‘Disability’s’ Date with Ontology and the Ableist Body of the Law. Griffi th Law Review, 10(1), 42-62.
Campbell, F.K. 2008a. Exploring internalized ableism using critical race theory. Disability & Society, 23(2), 151-162, DOI: 10.1080/09687590701841190
Campbell, F.K. 2008b. Refusing Able(ness): A Preliminary Conversation about Ableism. M/C Journal, 11(3). Online: http://journal.media-culture.org.au/index.php/mcjournal/article/view/46
Campbell, F.K. 2009. Contours of Ableism. The Production of Disability and Abledness. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
Campbell, F.K. 2012. Stalking Ableism: Using Disability to Expose ‘Abled’ Narcissism. In: Goodley, D., Hughes, B. and Davis, L. eds. Disability and Social Theory. New Developments and Directions. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan. Chapter 13: 212-230.
Campbell, F.K. 2017. Queer Anti-sociality and Disability Unbecoming: An Ableist Relations Project? In: Sircar, O. and Jain, D. eds. New Intimacies, Old Desires. Law, Culture and Queer Politics in Neoliberal Times. New Delhi: Zubaan Publishers. Chapter 10: 280-316.
Campbell, F.K. 2018. Refocusing and the Paradigm Shift: From Disability to Studies in Ableism. In: Ghai, A. ed. Disability in South Asia. Knowledge and Experience. New Delhi: Sage Publishing. Chapter 3: 38-57.
Campbell, F.K. 2019. Precision ableism: a studies in ableism approach to developing histories of disability and abledment. Rethinking History. DOI: 10.1080/13642529.2019.1607475
Christiansen, N.M. 2019. Article available in the following link: https://www.information.dk/debat/2019/06/markedet-gjort-psykisk-syg-lever-mennesker-daarligt?lst_tag (05072019)
Dræby Sørensen, A. 2016. Pædagogisk Psykologisk Uddannelsesrådgivning 2004-2011. Aarhus: The State and University Library - Aarhus. 141 pp. Report from The Danish School of Education (DPU - Danmarks institut for Pædagogik og Uddannelse), Aarhus University. Link: https://ebooks.au.dk/index.php/aul/catalog/book/115 (16082019)
Foucault, M. 1978. The Will to Knowledge. The History of Sexuality. Volume 1. Reprinted in Penguin Books under the present title 1998. London: Penguin Books.
Foucault. M. 1982a. The Subject and Power. In: Dreyfus, H.L. and Rabinow, P. eds. Michel Foucault. Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics. Second Edition. 1983. Chicago: The University of Chicago. Afterword: 208-226.
Foucault, M. 1982b. Lectures on Technologies of the self at the University of Vermont, autumn 1982. In: Martin, L. H.; Gutman, H. and Hutton, P. H. eds. Technologies of the self: a seminar with Michel Foucault.
London: Tavistock.
Goodley, D. 2014. Dis/ability studies: Theorising disablism and ableism. London: Routledge.
Goodley, D. 2020. Theorising Disability and Humanity. In: L. Ware ed. Critical Readings in Interdisciplinary Disability Studies (Dis)Assemblages. Critical Studies of Education 12, Cham: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-35309-4_4, 41-52. Chapter 4: 41-52.
Goodley, D. & Runswick-Cole, K. 2016. Becoming dishuman: thinking about the human through dis/ability. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 37:1, 1-15, DOI: 10.1080/01596306.2014.930021
Goodley, D.; Lawthom, R. & Runswick-Cole, K. 2014. Dis/ability and austerity: beyond work and slow death. Disability & Society. 29:6, 980-984, DOI:10.1080/09687599.2014.920125
Goodley, D., Lawthom, R., Liddiard, K. & Runswick-Cole, K. 2018. Feeling disability: theories of affect and critical disability studies, Disability & Society, 33:2, 197-217, DOI: 10.1080/09687599.2017.1402752
Goodley, D., Lawthom, R., Liddiard, K. & Runswick-Cole, K. 2019. Provocations for Critical Disability Studies. Disability & Society, 34:6, 972-997, DOI: 10.1080/09687599.2019.1566889.
Goodley, D., Lawthom, R., Liddiard, K. & Runswick-Cole, K. 2020. The Desire for New Humanisms. Journal of Disability Studies in Education 1. 1-20.
Han, B-C. 2010. The Burnout Society. English edition 2015. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Han, B-C. 2012. The Transparency Society. English edition 2015. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Han, B-C. 2017. Psychopolitics. London: Verso.
Haraway, D.J. 1991. Simians, Cyborgs, and Women. The Reinvention of Nature. London: Free Association Books.
Hobart, H.J.K & Kneese, T. 2020. Radical Care: Survival Strategies for Uncertain Times. In: Social Text (2020) 38 (1 (142)), 1–16. DOI: 10.1215/01642472-7971067
Madsen, M.O. 2009. Universitets død. Kritik af den nyliberale tendens. København: Frydenlund.
Massumi, B. 2017. The Principle of Unrest. Activist Philosophy in the Expanded Field. Link: http://openhumanitiespress.org/books/download/Massumi_2017_The-Principle-of-Unrest.pdf (05102020)
Mitchell, D.T. & Snyder, S.L. 2015. The Biopolitics of Disability. Neoliberalism, Ablenationalism, and Peripheral Embodiment. Michigan: University of Michigan Press.
Omnibus, 2016. Article available in the following link: http://omnibus.au.dk/en/archive/show/artikel/flere-studerende-soeger-stoette-paa-grund-af-psykiske-lidelser/ (05072019)
Pedersen, L.M & Pors Knudsen, M. 2015. Er det mig, der er problemet? - En virksomhedsteoretisk analyse of studiemæssige vanskeligheder. Psyke & Logos. 36, 67-90.
Runswick-Cole, K. & Goodley, D. 2015. Disability, austerity and cruel optimism. Canadian Journal of Disability Studies. 4(2), 162-186.
Sun, H-y. 2018. Prosthetic Confi gurations and Imagination: Dis/ability, Body, and Technology. Literary and Cultural Studies. 44 (1), 13-39.
Aastrup, V. 2011. A power-point presentation available in the following link: https://www.rm.dk/globalassets/.../oplag.../6-oplag-willy-aastrup.pptx (03072019).
Downloads
Publiceret
Citation/Eksport
Nummer
Sektion
Licens
Dette værk er under følgende licens Creative Commons Navngivelse –Ikke-kommerciel (by-nc).
Udgivelser i Kvinder, Køn og Forskning er beskyttet under Creative Commons License: CC Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0