Nytelse og destruksjon: det paradoksale ved seksualitetens kulturelle fremtredelsesformer

Abstract

For the individual, sexuality represents a basic physical and social need. In its ideal form this is realized in mutual expression of subjectivity. In its worst form however, at the very least one individual becomes a victim. Therefore sexuality may, on one
hand, represent the ideal frame for a social confirmation of belonging and respect for individual boundaries and needs. On the other hand, there is a potential opposite: Sexuality may be used as an abusive weapon that invades the individual, destroying
her/his dignity, leading to social rejection and in extreme cases even to suicide. Thought in Western culture is embused with dichotomies that partition phenomena. The two sides of the dichotomy are mutually exclusive and that side of the dichotomy
that is ascribed to abstract masculinity takes precedence over that which is attributed to abstract femininity. The mind/body-dichotomy has particulary influenced our understanding of sexuality and eroticism. In our culture it would appear that it is
generally more important to protect people's unhealthy vulnerabilities, than to activate the deepest positive forces in their life. The mind/body-dualism may protect mens vulnerability in various ways of living out their sexuality, including violence, but
it does not provide the same protection for women. Sexuality is a biological phenomena which has been given a cultural expression. This article focuses on how the cultural manifestations of sexuality are expressions of a masculine way of thinking (ideology/ myths/ fantasy) about sexuality. Tue many cultural and symbolic expressions of sexuality and eroticism present a picture full of paradoxes and antagonisms. In this article we will analyze sexuality and eroticism against the background of power and schisms.