Erkendelsens teori og erkendelsens psykologi
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/pl.v15i2.135812Abstract
I argue in the article for the classical distinction between a theory of knowledge, understood as the philosophical arguments put forward in support of scientific methods, on the one hand, - and the psychology of knowledge, understood as the empirical
study of how humans in practice cognize their world, on the other. With this distinction as the point of departure, Jens Marnmens concept of the specific human sense of the concrete is discussed. I maintain that on the one hand Mammens conceptualisation
clarify an important and general human capacity. On the other hand I try to sho how Marnmens Jack of distinction between the theory of knowledge and the psychology of knowledge makes it difficult to develop and investigate empirically the insight
he has formulated as the specific human sense of the concrete.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Ophavsret er tidsskriftets og forfatternes. Det er gældende praksis, at artikler publiceret i Psyke & Logos, som efterfølgende oversættes til andet sprog, af forfatteren frit kan publiceres i internationale tidsskrifter, dog således at det ved reference fremgår, at den oversatte artikel har et forlæg i en dansksproget version i Psyke & Logos. Artikler kan frit deles og linkes til på forsknings- og undervisningsnetværk (så som Blackboard). Link foretrækkes, fordi det giver oplysning om brug af tidsskriftets artikler.