How war affects the relationship: the consequences of veterans’ post-deployment reactions for intimacy and communication in military couples

Authors

  • Lea Tangelev Greve
  • Hanne Nørr Fentz

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7146/pl.v41i2.127515

Keywords:

PTSD, Relationships, Family life, stressreactions

Abstract

Consequences of deployment to an armed conflict may challenge veterans, as well as their partner and families, both directly and indirectly. The transition from deployment to the routines and intimate romantic relations of everyday life can be difficult for the military couple, especially in the presence of PTSD-symptoms. Research combining influences of these two phenomena (the post-deployment transition and the experience of PTSD-symptoms) on military couples’ romantic relationship has been scarce. First, we investigate how military couples may experience specific challenges in the post-deployment transition compared to normal couple transitions. We draw on empirical material on Danish veterans’ post-deployment phase to expand a general model for couple transitions. Second, we discuss how PTSD-symptoms can complicate the longer-term adjustment and relational interactions of military couples. We particularly focus on how veterans’ cognitive and emotional disturbances can undermine and stress intimacy processes and communication between partners. Finally, we argue that PTSDsymptoms and dysfunctional dyadic interactions may develop into mutually sustaining negative patterns over time. On this ground, we recommend a heightened awareness of normal dyadic challenges in the face of transitions, as well as of the consequences of PTSD-symptoms on sustaining negative dyadic processes by professionals working with the support or treatment of military couples after deployment.

Downloads

Published

2020-12-01

How to Cite

Greve, L. T., & Fentz, H. N. (2020). How war affects the relationship: the consequences of veterans’ post-deployment reactions for intimacy and communication in military couples. Psyke & Logos, 41(2), 149–176. https://doi.org/10.7146/pl.v41i2.127515