Nøgleord
Matematik
Learning to notice
Citation/Eksport
Resumé
I et forskningsprojekt på læreruddannelsen har vi designet og afprøvet et højstruktureret learning to notice-forløb med praksisvideo fra folkeskolens matematikundervisning. I denne artikel har vi fokus på, hvordan lærerstuderendes deltagelsesmønstre påvirker deres tilgang til at beskrive, genbeskrive og fortolke praksisvideoer. Vi har transskriberede lydoptagelser fra afprøvningen. Vi har ligeledes skriftlige produkter og transskriberede før- og efterinterviews med udvalgte studerende. Vi har udvalgt to cases, der viser væsentlige forskelle i gruppeprodukter som følge af de roller, de studerende
indtager. Det kalder på videreudvikling af designs, der kan få de lærerstuderende til at reflektere over bestemte rollers betydning for kvaliteten af gruppeprodukter.
Referencer
Artigue, M. & Blomhøj, M. (2013). Conceptualizing inquiry-based education in mathematics. ZDM, 45(6), 797-810. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-013-0506-6
Blomberg, G., Sherin, M.G., Renkl, A., Glogger, I. & Seidel, T. (2014). Understanding video as a tool for teacher education: Investigating instructional strategies to promote reflection. Instructional Science, 42, 443-463. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-013-9281-6
Blomhøj, M. (2021). Undersøgende matematikundervisning – fra teori til praksis. I M.W. Andersen & P. Weng (red.), Håndbog om matematik i grundskolen: Læring, undervisning og vejledning (2. udg., s. 283-310). Dansk Psykologisk Forlag.
Creswell, J.W. (2008). Grounded theory designs. I J.W. Creswell (red.), Educational Research: Planning, Conducting and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research (3. udg., s. 422-500). Pearson.
Dindyal, J., Schack, E.O., Choy, B.H. & Sherin, M.G. (2021). Exploring the terrains of mathematics teacher noticing. ZDM, 53(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-021-01249-y
Elf, N. (2022). The surplus of quality: How to study quality in teaching in three QUINT projects. I M. Blikstad-Balas, K. Klette & M. Tengberg (red.), Ways of analyzing teaching quality: Potentials and pitfalls (s. 53-88). Scandinavian University Press.
Flyvbjerg, B. (2020). Fem misforståelser om casestudiet. I S. Brinkmann & L. Tanggaard (red.), Kvalitative metoder: En grundbog (3. udg., s. 621-655). Hans Reitzels Forlag.
Frederiksen, M. (2020). Mixed methods-forskning. I S. Brinkmann & L. Tanggaard (red.), Kvalitative metoder: En grundbog (3. udg., s. 257-277). Hans Reitzels Forlag.
Gaudin, C. & Chaliès, S. (2015). Video viewing in teacher education and professional development: A literature review. Educational Research Review, 16, 41-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.06.001
Hansen, H.C., Schou, J., Jess, K. & Skott, J. (2013). Matematik for lærerstuderende: Geometri, 4.-10. klasse. Samfundslitteratur.
Hansen, R. & Hansen, P. (2013). Undersøgelsesbaseret matematikundervisning. MONA, 2013(4), 36-54. https://tidsskrift.dk/mona/article/view/36061/37413
Johnson, R.B. & Christensen, L. (2014). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches. SAGE Publications.
Lehrer, R., Jacobson, C., Kemeny, V. & Strom, D. (1999). Building on children’s intuitions to develop mathematical understanding of space. I E. Fennema & T.A. Romberg (red.), Mathematics classrooms that promote understanding (s. 63-87). Routledge.
Larsen, D., Hjelmborg, M., Junge, L., Schou, J., & Kørhsen, L. (2022). Fagdidaktik i praksissituationer – Learning to notice i læreruddannelsens matematikundervisning. MONA, 2022(3). https://tidsskrift.dk/mona/article/view/133864
Mason, J. (2021). Learning about noticing, by, and through, noticing. ZDM, 53(1), 231-243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01192-4
Miller, M.J. (2009). Talking about our troubles: Using video-based dialogue to build preservice teachers’ professional knowledge. The Teacher Educator, 44(3), 143-163. https://doi.org/10.1080/08878730902954167
Niss, M.A. & Jankvist, U.T. (2020). Matematikvejledning i gymnasiet: Anvendelse af teori i praksis. Frydenlund.
Seidel, T. & Stürmer, K. (2014). Modeling and measuring the structure of professional vision in preservice teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 51(4), 739-771. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831214531321
Sherin, M.G. (2004). New perspectives on the role of video in teacher education. I J. Brophy (red.), Using video in teacher education (s. 1-27). Elsevier.
Skott, J. (2013). Understanding the role of the teacher in emerging classroom practices: Searching for patterns of participation. ZDM, 45, 547-559. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-013-0500-z
Skott, J., Larsen, D.M. & Østergaard, C.H. (2011). From beliefs to patterns of participation: Shifting the research perspective on teachers. Nordic Studies in Mathematics Education, 16(1-2), 29-55. https://ncm.gu.se/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/16_12_029056_skott.pdf
Tanggaard, L. & Brinkmann, S. (2020). Interviewet: Samtalen som forskningsmetode. I S. Brinkmann & L. Tanggaard (red.), Kvalitative metoder: En grundbog (3. udg., s. 33-63). Hans Reitzels Forlag.
van Es, E.A. (2009). Participants’ roles in the context of a video club. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 18(1), 100-137. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508400802581668
van Es, E.A. & Sherin, M.G. (2002). Learning to notice: Scaffolding new teachers’ interpretations of classroom interactions. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 10(4), 571-596. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/9171/
van Es, E.A. & Sherin, M.G. (2008). Mathematics teachers’ “learning to notice” in the context of a video club. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(2), 244-276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.11.005
van Es, E.A. & Sherin, M.G. (2021). Expanding on prior conceptualizations of teacher noticing. ZDM, 53(1), 17-27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01211-4
van Es, E.A., Tunney, J., Goldsmith, L.T. & Seago, N. (2014). A framework for the facilitation of teachers’ analysis of video. Journal of Teacher Education, 65(4), 340-356. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487114534266