Blended Learning Analytics Model for Evaluation (BLAME). Et case-studie af universitetsunderviseres brug af Blackboard

Authors

  • Peter Musaeus Center for Health Sciences Education, Aarhus Universitet
  • Andreas Brændstrup Bennedsen Center for Health Sciences Education, Aarhus Universitet
  • Janne Saltoft Hansen Center for Health Sciences Education, Aarhus Universitet
  • Mads Ronald Dahl Center for Health Sciences Education, Aarhus Universitet

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7146/lom.v8i13.20532

Keywords:

Learning management system, learning analytics, evaluering.

Abstract

I denne artikel vil vi præsentere en strategi til inddragelse af læringsanalytik (learning analytics) ved evaluering af universitetsunderviseres brug af et nyt LMS på Aarhus Universitet: Blackboard. Vi diskuterer en model (BLAME: Blended Learning Analytics Model of Evaluation) for, hvordan kategorisering af kurser og data om læringsanalytik indsamlet på Blackboard kan integreres. Endvidere belyser vi, hvilke implikationer en sådan læringsanalytik kan have for blended learning ved at analysere to forskellige uddannelses-cases/illustrationer. Dernæst diskuterer vi pædagogisk udvikling i forbindelse med evalueringsrapport om underviseres brug af Blackboard som beslutningsstøtte for feedback og pædagogisk intervention. Artiklen slutter med en diskussion af, hvordan data til læringsanalytik bør indsamles i LMS og bruges til afrapportering og undervisningsudvikling.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Beck, H. P., & Davidson, W. D. (2001). Establishing an early warning system: Predicting low grades in college students from survey of academic orientations scores. Research in Higher Education, 42:6;709-723

Bratt, S. (2007). A framework for assessing the pedagogical utility of learning management systems. Proceedings of world conference on elearning in corporate, government, healthcare, and higher education. Chesapeake, VA: AACE pp. 218–225.

Bratt, S., Coulson, I., & Kostasshuk, S. (2009). Utilizing a learning management system in a blended learning design to enhance self-regulated learning strategies in a baccalaureate nursing fundamentals course. International conference on information communication technologies in education, (Corfu, Greece)

Collins A. A, Joseph D & Bielaczyc K (2004) Design Research: Theoretical and Methodological Issues. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13:1;15-42

Davies, I., Green, P., Rosemann, M., Indulska, M., & Gallo, S. (2006). How do practitioners use conceptual modeling in practice? Data & Knowledge Engineering, 58:3; 358–380

Dawson, S. P., McWilliam, E., & Tan, J. P. L. (2008). Teaching smarter: How mining ICT data can inform and improve learning and teaching practice. Melbourne. Proceedings ascilite pp. 221-230

Dawson, S., Bakharia, A., & Heathcote, E. (2010). SNAPP: Realising the affordances of real-time SNA within networked learning environments. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Networked Learning 2010, Aalborg, Denmark. pp.125-133

Educational it (2014) Strategi og ledelse, mere om Educational IT. Aarhus Universitet. http://medarbejdere.au.dk/strategi/problemanalysen/udviklingsproces2011/faktaomforandringernehvaderbesluttet/tvaerinitiv/kvalitetogeducationalit/ (besøgt sidst 13.3.2015)

Garrison D.R and Kanuka H. (2004) Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 7:2;95-105

Garrote Jurado, R. (2013). Barriers to a wider Implementation of LMS in Higher Education: a Swedish case study, 2006-2011. E-learning and Education (eleed) issue9

Gibbons, A. S., & Brewer, E. K. (2005). Elementary principles of design languages and design notation systems for instructional design. Innovations in instructional technology: Essays in honor of M. David Merrill, 111-130

Goodrich, H. (1996). Understanding rubrics. Educational Leadership. 54:4;14-17

Lockyer L, Heathcote E, and Dawson S (2013). Informing Pedagogical Action: Aligning Learning Analytics With Learning Design. American Behavioral Scientist, 12:3;1-21

Macfadyen, L., & Dawson, S. (2012). Numbers Are Not Enough. Why e-Learning Analytics Failed to Inform an Institutional Strategic Plan. Educational Technology & Society, 15:3;149-163

Mazza, R., & Dimitrova, V. (2004). Visualising student tracking data to support instructors in web-based distance education. In: Proceedings of the 13th international World Wide Web conference on Alternate track papers & posters ACM pp. 154-161

Morris, L. V., Finnegan, C., & Wu, S. S. (2005). Tracking student behavior, persistence, and achievement in online courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 8:3;221-231.

Naveh G, Tubin D, Pliskin N. (2010). Student LMS use and satisfaction in academic institutions: The organizational perspective. The Internet and Higher Education, 13:3;127-133

Pardo, A., & Kloos, C. D. (2011, February). Stepping out of the box: towards analytics outside the learning management system. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge ACM pp. 163-167

Porter W.W, Graham C.R, Spring K.A and Welch K.R (2014). Blended learning in higher education: Institutional adoption and implementation, Computers & Education, 75;185-195

Recker, J. (2010). Continued use of process modeling grammars: the impact of individual difference factors. European Journal of Information Systems, 19:1;76–92

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2015-02-27

How to Cite

Musaeus, P., Bennedsen, A. B., Hansen, J. S., & Dahl, M. R. (2015). Blended Learning Analytics Model for Evaluation (BLAME). Et case-studie af universitetsunderviseres brug af Blackboard. Tidsskriftet Læring Og Medier (LOM), 8(13). https://doi.org/10.7146/lom.v8i13.20532

Issue

Vol. 8 No. 13 (2015): Kvalitet i IKT-støttede læringsmiljøer & learning analytics

Section

Articles

License



Articles published in the Journal of Learning and Media are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 Unported Licens.

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication; simultaneously articles are licensend under the Creative Commons Attribution license: Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerviatives (by-nc-nd). Read about this license at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/

---

At LOM.dk, you will also find articles from the discontinued Journal for the Continuing and Further Education of the Danish Universities (UNEV). Note that special rules apply to UNEV articles:

It is the authors and any other copyright holder who have the copyright of articles published under the auspices of UNEV, and access to the articles is contingent on users acknowledging and complying with the associated legal guidelines:

  • Users may download and print one copy of any UNEV publication for private studies or research.
  • The redistribution of articles or the use of these for revenue-funded activities or commercial purposes are not allowed.
  • It is not allowed to distribute the URLs of UNEV articles.