Ecotones i Teknologiforståelse

Udviklingen af Studerendes Professionelle Agency på Tværs af Uddannelse

Authors

  • Camilla Finsterbach Kaup Professionhøjskolen UCN
  • Line Marie Mosbæk Thordahl
  • Jesper Dam Larsen
  • Rikke Sandberg Kjær
  • Susanne Dau

Keywords:

ecotones, teknologiforståelse, professionsuddannelse, professionel agency, GenAI, vignetmetode

Abstract

The digital transformation has reshaped professional practices across sectors, as digital
technologies increasingly act not only as supportive tools but also as mediators in decision-making processes and interactions. In light of this development, it becomes relevant
to explore the role of technology in relation to students’ development of professional
agency. The purpose of this article is to investigate how students’ professional agency unfolds when they work with ecotone-like situations in which digital and analogue elements
are in play in their imagined professional practice, and which professional and ethical reflections emerge in this process.
To address this, the study analyzes three different professional fields within technology,
healthcare, and pedagogy. It employs qualitative methods, including students’ written reflective assignments and focus group interviews, based on a vignette generated using
GenAI. The vignette method was chosen because it enables an in-depth exploration of students’ reflections on their professional agency in relation to technology. In total, twelve
reflective assignments and three focus group interviews with twelve students are analyzed.
The article presents new insights into how technology across professions shapes students’ understanding of their future professional practice and how professional agency is
articulated differently in pedagogy, health and technology-oriented programs.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bekendtgørelse om uddannelsen til professionsbachelor i digital konceptudvikling. (2018). BEK

nr. 1014 af 02/07/2018. Uddannelses- og Forskningsministeriet. https://www.retsinformation.dk/eli/lta/2018/1014

Bekendtgørelse om erhvervsakademiuddannelsen i sundhedsadministration. (2021). BEK nr.

141 af 28/01/2021. Uddannelses- og Forskningsministeriet. https://www.retsinformation.dk/eli/lta/2021/141

Bekendtgørelse om uddannelsen til professionsbachelor som pædagog. (2019). BEK nr. 1225

af 25/11/2019. Børne- og Undervisningsministeriet. https://www.retsinformation.dk/eli/lta/2019/1225

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed

methods approaches. Fifth edition. SAGE.

Dau, S. (2016). The Borderland: how blurred ecotones influence study activities. In EDULEARN16 Proceedings IATED. https://library.iated.org/publications/EDULEARN16

Edwards, S. E. (2023). Concepts for early childhood education and care in the postdigital. Postdigital Science and Education, 5(3), 777–798. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-022-00356-7

Flyvbjerg, B. (2010). Fem misforståelser om casestudiet [Five misunderstandings about casestudy research]. I S. Brinkmann & L. Tanggaard (Red.), Kvalitative metoder (s. 463–488).

Hans Reitzels Forlag.

Frank Jørgensen, S., Heiberg, T., Lorenzen, H., Birk, T., E. Møller, M., Liikanen, E., … Ellegaard,

M. (2025). Case-study of teaching technological literacy for laboratory technological professions in the framework of computational thinking. Tidsskriftet Læring Og Medier

(LOM), 18(32). https://doi.org/10.7146/lom.v18i32.158611

Hedegaard, M. (2008). Principles for interpreting research protocols. In M. Hedegaard, M. Fleer,

J. Bang, & P. Hviid (Eds.), Studying children: A cultural-historical approach (pp. 46–64).

Open University Press.

Heiselberg, L. (2008). Intelligent design af fokusgrupper – om metodisk design af fokusgrupper

og menneskets forskellige intelligenser. MedieKultur: Journal of Media and Communication

Research, 24(45), 4–16. https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v24i45.509

Horn, L. H., Jensen, C. G., Kjærgaard, T., Sørensen, I. M., Valbak-Andersen, C., Bundgaard, S.

B., & Lukassen, N. B. (2020). Hvidbog om refleksiv praksislæring.

Kjærgaard, T., & Lassen, A. M. (2022). Teknologiforståelser i professionerne: Towards a context-dependent technological literacy. Learning Tech, 7(11), 15–43.

https://doi.org/10.7146/lt.v7i11.128421

Jandrić, P., Knox, J., Besley, T., Ryberg, T., Suoranta, J., & Hayes, S. (2018). Postdigital science

and education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 50(10), 893–899.

https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2018.1454000

Jandrić, P., MacKenzie, A., & Knox, J. (2024). Postdigital research: Genealogies, challenges,

and future perspectives. Postdigital Science and Education, 6, 409–415.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-022-00306-3

Launsø, L., Olsen, L., & Rieper, O. (2011). Forskning om og med mennesker: Forskningstyper

og forskningsmetoder i samfundsforskningen (6. udg.). København: Nyt Nordisk Forlag Arnold Busck.

Macgilchrist, F. (2021). What is ‘critical’ in critical studies of edtech? Three responses. Learning, Media and Technology, 46(3), 243–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2021.1958843

Rolandsson, B., Alasoini, T., Berglund, T., Dølvik, J. E., Hedenus, A., Ilsøe, A., Larsen, T. P., Rasmussen, S., Røed Steen, J., Hjelm, E., & Varje, P. (2020). Digital transformations of traditional work in the Nordic countries (TemaNord 2020:540). Nordic Council of Ministers.

https://doi.org/10.6027/temanord2020-540

Ryberg, T., Davidsen, J., Bernhard, J., & Larsen, M. C. (2021). Ecotones: A conceptual contribution to postdigital thinking. Postdigital Science and Education, 3(1).

https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00191-5

Ryberg, T., & Sinclair, C. (2016). The relationships between policy, boundaries and research in

networked learning. In T. Ryberg, C. Sinclair, S. Bayne, & M. de Laat (Eds.), Research, boundaries, and policy in networked learning (pp. 1–20). Cham: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-

31130-2_1

Søndergaard, K. D. & Hasse, C. (2012). Teknologiforståelse på skoler og hospitaler. Aarhus

Universitetsforlag

Trede, F., & Jackson, D. (2019). Educating the deliberate professional and enhancing the professional agency through peer reflection of work-integrated learning. Active Learning in

Higher Education, 23(1), 39–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787419869125

Trede, F., Markauskaite, L., McEwen, C., & Macfarlane, S. (2019). Education for practice in a

hybrid space: Enhancing professional learning with mobile technology. Springer.

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7410-4

Uddannelses- og Forskningsministeriet. (2023, 1. november). Ny bred aftale skal begrænse

skærme i dagtilbud. https://www.uvm.dk/aktuelt/nyheder/uvm/2023/nov/231101-nybred-aftale-skal-begraense-skaerme-i-dagtilbud

Wallace, J. (2011). Technological literacy seminar 16 May 2011 DPU: A review of definitions.

Aarhus Universitet. https://dpu.dk/fileadmin/www.dpu.dk/e-boeger/OL/Working_papers/Technological_Literacy_Seminar_16_May_2011_DPU_-_A_review_of_Definitions.pd

Downloads

Published

2025-12-15

How to Cite

Kaup, C. F., Thordahl, L. . M. M., Larsen, J. D., Kjær, R. S., & Dau, S. (2025). Ecotones i Teknologiforståelse: Udviklingen af Studerendes Professionelle Agency på Tværs af Uddannelse. Tidsskriftet Læring Og Medier (LOM), 18(32). Retrieved from https://tidsskrift.dk/lom/article/view/152757

Issue

Section

LOM 32: Technology at Work – Profession-Oriented Use of Technology in Educational Contexts