DUT Guide on Supervision


  • Gitte Wichmann-Hansen Centre for Educational Development, Aarhus Universitet




The aim of this guide is to provide tips for supervisors on how to support students as active, independent and prepared participants who drive their own projects forward. It relates to supervision of projects at bachelor-, master- and PhD level. The underlying basis of the guide is twofold: 1) supervision is an increasingly complex activity that involves a demanding set of competences; 2) a good supervisor is a flexible supervisor who can adapt to different situations, student needs and levels of the curriculum.


Agné, H., & Mörkenstam, U. (2018). Should first-year doctoral students be supervised collectively or individually? Effects on thesis completion and time to completion. Higher Education Research & Development, 37(4), 669-682.


Ajjawi, R., Kent, F., Broadbent, J., Tai, J. H.-M., Bearman, M., & Boud, D. (2021). Feedback that works: a realist review of feedback interventions for written tasks. Studies in Higher Education.


Akister, J., Williams, I., & Maynard, A. (2009). Using group supervision for undergraduate dissertations: a preliminary enquiry into the student experience. Practice and Evidence of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education 4(2) 77-94.

Altekruse, M. K., & Brew, L. (2000). Using the web for distance learning. In J. W. Bloom, & G. R. Walz (Eds.), Cybercounseling and cyberlearning: Strategies and resources for the millennium (pp. 129-141). Alexandria: American Counseling Association.

Anderson, G., Boud, D., & Sampson, J. (1998). Qualities of Learning Contracts. In: J. Stephenson J., & M. Yorke (Eds.), Capability and Quality in Higher Education (pp. 162-173). Kogan Page.

Anderson, C., Day, K. & McLaughlin, P. (2006). Mastering the Dissertation: Lecturers' Representations of the Purposes and Processes of Master's Level Dissertation Supervision. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 149-168.


Baker, M.J., Cluett, E., Ireland, L., Reading, S., Rourke, S. (2014). Supervising undergraduate research: a collective approach utilising groupwork and peer support. Nurse Education Today 34(4), 637-642.


Baltzersen, R.K. (2013). The Importance of Metacommunication in Supervision in Higher Education. International Journal of Higher Education, 2(2), 128-40.


Barnes, G.P., & Cheng, M. (2019). Working independently on the dissertation proposal: experiences of international master's students. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 43(8), 1120-1132.


Bastalich, W. (2017). Content and context in knowledge production: a critical review of doctoral supervision literature. Studies in Higher Education, 42(7), 1145-1157.


Benmore, A. (2016). Boundary management in doctoral supervision: how supervisors negotiate roles and role transitions throughout the supervisory journey. Studies in Higher Education, 41(7), 1251-1264.


Deuchar, R. (2008). Facilitator, director or critical friend? Contradiction and congruence in doctoral supervision styles. Teaching in Higher Education, 13(4), 489-500.


O'Donovan, B.M., den Outer, B., Price, M., & Lloyd, A. (2021). What makes good feedback good? Studies in Higher Education, 46(2), 318-329.


Duke, D.C., & Denicolo, P.M. (2017). What supervisors and universities can do to enhance doctoral student experience (and how they can help themselves). FEMS Microbiol Lett., May 1;364(9).


Dysthe, O., Samara, A., & Westrheim, K. (2006). Multivoiced supervision of Master's students: a case study of alternative supervision practices in higher education. Studies in Higher education, 31(3), 299-318.


Dysthe, O. (2006). Rettleiaren som lærer, partnar eller meister? In O. Dysthe, & A. Samara (Eds.), Forskningsveiledning på master- og doktorgradsnivå (pp. 228-248). Abstrakt Forlag.

Gurr, G.M. (2001). Negotiating the "Rackety Bridge" - a Dynamic Model for Aligning Supervisory Style with Research Student Development. Higher Education Research & Development, 20(1), 81-92.


Halse, C. (2011). 'Becoming a supervisor': The impact of doctoral supervision on supervisors' learning. Studies in Higher Education, 36(5), 557-570.


Handal, G., & Lauvås, P. (2006). Forskningsveilederen. Cappelen Akademisk Forlag.

Harwood, N., & Petrić, B. (2020). Adaptive master's dissertation supervision: a longitudinal case study. Teaching in Higher Education, 25(1), 68-83.


Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The Power of Feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112.


Hockey, J. (1996). A contractual solution to problems in the supervision of PhD degrees in the UK. Studies in Higher Education, (21)3, 359-371.


Janssen, S., Vuuren, M.v & de Jong, M.D.T. (2020). Sensemaking in supervisor-doctoral student relationships: revealing schemas on the fulfillment of basic psychological needs. Studies in Higher Education.


Jensen, T. W. (2019). DUT Guide om akademisk skrivning. Dansk Universitetspædagogisk Tidsskrift, 14(26), 115-124.


Kumar, S., & Johnson, M. (2019). Online mentoring of dissertations: the role of structure and support. Studies in Higher Education 33(1), 59-71.


Kumar, S., Kumar, V., & Taylor, S. (2020). A Guide to Online Supervision. UK Council for Graduate Education. Retrieved from http://www.ukcge.ac.uk/media/download.aspx?MediaId=2268

Laustsen, S., Wichmann-Hansen, G., Aagaard, H., Bahrami, G., & Dreyer, P. (2012). Brugen af vejlederbrev til universitetsstuderende - en diskussion af dets betydning i vejledningsprocessen. Dansk Universitetspædagogisk Tidsskrift, 7(12), 46-57.


Lee, A. (2020). Successful Research Supervision. Advising students doing research. Routledge.


Lélis, C. (2020). It's milestone, Not limescale! Milestoned group supervision as an approach to descale postgraduate projects. New Vistas 6(1), 26-31.


Lichtfouse, R. (2013). Scientific Writing for Impact Factor Journals. Nova Science Publishers, Inc.

Lindsay, D (2011). Scientific writing = Thinking in Words. CSIRO Publishing. ISBN: 9780643101579


Lovitts, B. (2008). The Transition to Independent Research: Who Makes It, Who Doesn't, and Why. The Journal of Higher Education, 79(3), 296-325.


Magnusson, J. (2021). Handledarens frågor: Att möjliggöra självständighet i ett handledningssamtal. Högre utbildning, 11(1), 56-75.


Mahoney, P., Macfarlane, S., & Ajjawi, R. (2018). A qualitative synthesis of video feedback in higher education. Teaching in Higher Education, 24(2), 157-179.


Manathunga, C. (2019). 'Timescapes' in doctoral education: the politics of temporal equity in higher education. Higher Education Research & Development, 38(6), 1227-1239.


Marnewick, A.L. (2020). A supervision approach to facilitate learning during the master's research journey. Teaching in Higher Education.


Masters K.S., & Kreeger, P.K. (2017). Ten simple rules for developing a mentor-mentee expectations document. PLoS Comput Biol 13(9): e1005709.


McAlpine, L., Castello, M., & Pyhaltö, K. (2020). What influences PhD graduate trajectories during the degree: a research-based policy agenda. Higher Education 80, 1011-1043


McAlpine, L., & McKinnon, M. (2013). Supervision - the most variable of variables: Student perspectives. Studies in Continuing Education, 35, 265-280.


Moxham, L., Dwyer, T., & Reid-Searl, K. (2013). Articulating expectations for PhD candidature upon commencement: ensuring supervisor/student 'best fit'. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 35(4), 345-354.


Müllen, R. von. (2019). DUT Guide: Peer-Feedback. Dansk Universitetspædagogisk Tidsskrift, 14(27), 188-196.


Nash, C. (2021). Improving Mentorship and Supervision during COVID-19 to Reduce Graduate Student Anxiety and Depression Aided by an Online Commercial Platform Narrative Research Group. Challenges, 12, 11.


Nielsen, T.A., & Wichmann-Hansen, G. (2019). Supervision of students' projects: How to support and increase flexibility and efficiency by use of web 2.0 technologies? In J. Theo Bastiaens (Ed.), Proceedings of EdMedia + Innovate Learning (pp. 1757-1761). https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/210200/.

Nordentoft, H. M., Thomsen, R., & Wichmann-Hansen, G. (2013). Collective academic supervision: a model for participation and learning in higher education. Higher Education, 65(5), 581-593.


Nordentoft, H.M., Hvass, H., & Mariager-Anderson, K. (2019). Kollektiv Akademisk Vejledning. Fra forskning til praksis. Aarhus Universitetsforlag.

Pyhältö, K., Vekkaila, J., & Keskinen, J. (2015). Fit matters in the supervisory relationship: doctoral students and supervisors' perceptions about the supervisory activities. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 52(1), 4-16.


Rienecker, L., & Jørgensen, P.S. (2017) The Good Paper. A handbook for writing papers in higher education (2nd ed.). Frederiksberg, Samfundslitteratur.

Rienecker, L., Wichmann-Hansen, G., & Jørgensen, P.S. (2019). God vejledning af specialer, bacheloropgaver og projekter. Frederiksberg, Samfundslitteratur.

Robert, L.D., & Seaman, K. (2018). Good Undergraduate Dissertation Supervision: Perspectives of Supervisors and Dissertation Coordinators. International Journal for Academic Development, 23 (1), 28-40.


Robertson, M. J. (2019). Power and Doctoral Supervision Teams: Developing Team Building Skills in Collaborative Doctoral Research. Routledge.


Rooij, E. Van, Fokkens-Bruinsma, M., & Jansen, E. (2019). Factors that influence PhD candidates' success: the importance of PhD project characteristics. Studies in Continuing Education.


Sambrook, s., Stewart, J., & Roberts, C. (2008). Doctoral supervision . . . a view from above, below and the middle! Journal of Further and Higher Education, 32(1), 71-84.


Sverdlik, A., Hall, N., McAlpine, L., & Hubbard, K. (2018). The PhD experience: a review of the factors influencing doctoral students' completion, achievement, and well-being. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 13, 361-388.


Todd, M.J., Smith, K., & Bannister, P. (2006). Supervising a social science undergraduate dissertation: staff experiences and perceptions. Teaching in Higher Education, 11((2), 161-173.


Taylor, S., Kiley, M., & Humphrey, R. (2018) Handbook for Doctoral Supervisors. 2nd Edition. Routledge, 2017.


Taylor, S. (2019). Good supervisory practice framework. UK Council for Graduate Education. Retrieved 27.05.2021 from https://supervision.ukcge.ac.uk/good-supervisory-practice-framework/

Wichmann-Hansen, G., & Herrmann, K.J. (2017). Does external funding push doctoral supervisors to be more directive? A large-scale Danish study. Higher Education, 74(2), 357-376.


Wichmann-Hansen, G., Herrmann, K.J., Bager-Elsborg, A., & Andersen, P. (2018). Hvad er konsekvensen af Fremdriftsreformen for specialevejledning? [Paper presentation]. DUN Konferencen, Denmark, https://dun-net.dk/media/489845/pa13-hvad-er-konsekvensen-af-fremdriftsreformen-for-specialevejledning.pdf

Wichmann-Hansen, G., & Jensen, T.W. (2015). Supervision: Process management and communication. In L. Rienecker, P.S. Jørgensen, J. Dolin, G.H. Ingerslev (Eds.), University Teaching and Learning (pp. 327-492). Forlaget Samfundslitteratur.

Wichmann-Hansen, G., & Nielsen, T.A. (2019). Online vejledning. In L. Rienecker, G. Wichmann-Hansen, & P.S. Jørgensen, God vejledning af specialer, bacheloropgaver og projekter (pp. 211-219). Forlaget Samfundslitteratur.


Winstone, N. E., & Carless, D. (2019). Designing Effective Feedback Processes in Higher Education: A Learning-Focused Approach. Routledge.


Winstone, N.E., Ajjawi, R., Dirkx, K., & Boud, D. (2021). Measuring what matters: the positioning of students in feedback processes within national student satisfaction surveys. Studies in Higher Education.


Wisker, G. (2012) The Good Supervisor. Supervising Postgraduate and Undergraduate Research for Doctoral Theses and Dissertations (2nd ed.). Palgrave Macmillan.

Woodhouse, J., & Wood, P. (2020). Creating dialogic spaces: developing doctoral students' critical writing skills through peer assessment and review. Studies in Higher Education.






Wichmann-Hansen, G. (2021). DUT Guide on Supervision. Dansk Universitetspædagogisk Tidsskrift, 16(31). https://doi.org/10.7146/dut.v16i31.127292