Om behovet att skilja mellan empiriska och begreppligt konstitutiva frågor
This article clarifies the fundamental difference between empirical and conceptual questions in education. In the ongoing debate about the role of philosophy of education, many authors either unreflectively assume or actively demand that philosophy of education should try to adapt to (empircal) science. Through a discussion of the possibilities of a child to open up to educational processes (Herbart: Bildbarkeit) the article illustrates how philosophical reflection on education fundamentally differs in character from empirical approaches. It suggests that one important task for philosophy of education is to clarify what questions can be answered empirically from those that are constitutive of our understanding of education. Wittgenstein’s later philosophy is used as a central starting point in this article.
The author(s) and the journal share the Copyright. Articles published in Studier i Pædagogisk Filosofi (Studies in Philosophy of Education) may be used (downloaded) and reused (distributed, copied, cited) for non-commercial purposes with reference to the authors and publication host.Articles submitted to Studier i Pædagogisk Filosofi (Studies in Philosophy of Education) may not be submitted to - or published in - other journals. Articles may be uploaded in institutional repositories if the author is required to so as part of a grant or institutional requirement.