Crisis or Struggle? A Language of Natality as a Struggle for Education
Taking its point of departure in the connotations to war and violence inherent in what is here called the ‘language of crisis’ (Jantzen), the purpose of this article is to explore what it might mean to reassess the language of educational change and policy reform in the imagery of natality and birth (Arendt). If the task in a ‘crisis’ is to fi ght against the crisis, eff ectively and forcefully, the argument of the paper is that the root metaphors of natality and birth puts into play an imagery that makes possible a relational language for educational change and reform. If the language we use has performative consequences, the question explored is what a ‘language of natality’ can make possible as a language of struggle for education.
References: Arendt, Hannah. (1998). The Human Condition. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. _______. (1948/2004). The Origins of Totalitarianism. New York: Schocken Books. _______. (1929/1996). Love and Saint Augustine. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press _______. (1961/1993). The Crisis of Education. In Between Past and Future. New York: Penguin Books. Bergdahl & Langmann. (2017). Time for Values: Responding Educationally to the Call from the Past. In: Studies in Philosophy and Education, ISSN 0039-3746, E-ISSN 1573-191X. Biesta, Gert, J.J. (2016). Good education in an age of measurement: ethics, politics, democracy. London: Routledge. Irigaray, Luce. (1985). Speculum of the Other Woman. New York: Cornell University Press. _______. (1993). Je, tu, nous: Toward a Culture of Difference. London: Routledge. _______. (1996). I Love to You (A. Martin, Trans.). New York: Routledge. Jantzen, Grace M. (1998). Becoming Divine. Towards a feminist philosophy of religion. Manchester: Manchester University Press. _______. (2001). ‘Flourishing: Towards and ethic of natality’. Feminist Theory, Vol. 2(2), p. 219-232. _______. (2004). Foundations of Violence. Death and the Displacement of Beauty. London: Routledge. Levinson, Natasha. (2001). The Paradox of Natality: Teaching the the Midst of Beleatedness. in Hannah Arendt and Education: Renewing our Common World, (ed.) Mordechai Gordon, 2001, Boulder: Westview Press. Masschelein Jan & Simons Maarten. (2013). In Defence of the School: A Public Issue. Leuven: E-ducation, Culture & Society Publishers. Månsson, Niclas & Säfström, Carl Anders. (conference presentation).”The Limits of Learning”. Paper presented at ECER 2013, Istanbul.
The author(s) and the journal share the Copyright. Articles published in Studier i Pædagogisk Filosofi (Studies in Philosophy of Education) may be used (downloaded) and reused (distributed, copied, cited) for non-commercial purposes with reference to the authors and publication host.Articles submitted to Studier i Pædagogisk Filosofi (Studies in Philosophy of Education) may not be submitted to - or published in - other journals. Articles may be uploaded in institutional repositories if the author is required to so as part of a grant or institutional requirement.