The Interview as Convergent Point *

Between Qualitative Research and Performance Art

Forfattere

  • Inga Gerner Nielsen

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7146/peri.v18i33.124663

Resumé

This article explores how a combination of qualitative research and immersive performance has given Inga Gerner Nielsen insight into her audience’s aesthetic perception and imaginary realm in a performance installation. It begins by affirming that to ask an audience open questions about a performance only provides testimony of the after-rationalizations of their experience. The author introduces a phenomenological interview method which draws on sense-memory techniques directing the interviewee to produce thick descriptions, actualizing the lived experience in the interview. In response to Norman K. Denzin’s call for a performative dialogical social science, Nielsen examines why interview material should be conceptualized as performance and explores how working artistically with the interview setup can serve to highlight inherent power dynamics. The article ends with examples showing how the interview was turned into a central immersive element of Inga Gerner Nielsen’s artworks.

Forfatterbiografi

Inga Gerner Nielsen

Inga Gerner Nielsen has a BA in Sociology and an MA in Modern Culture. In 2007, she co-founded the activist
performance collective Club de la Faye, and in 2010 the performance agency Fiction Pimps. In 2013, she directed ‘The Velvet State’, Fiction Pimps’ critically acclaimed long-durational staging of the Roskilde Festivals Art Zone. She received the Leipzig Bewegungskunstpreis in 2017 along with her partner Johannes Maria Schmit for their site-specific one-to-one performance ‘The Queeng of Ama*r’.

Referencer

American Sociological Association, 1996, Code of Ethics - and Policies and Procedures of The ASA Committee on Professional Ethics. New York: ASA Publications.

Biggs, Michael and Karlsson, Henrik, 2011, ‘Evaluating Quality in Artistic Research’ in Biggs, Michael and Karlson, Henrik eds, Routledge Companion to Research in the Arts. London, New York: Routledge.

Borgdorff, Henk, 2010, ‘The Production of Knowledge in Artistic Research’ in Biggs, Michael & Karlsson, Henrik eds, The Routledge Companion to Research in the Arts. London, New York: Routledge.

Bourdieu, Pierre, 1986, Distinction. A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. London: Routledge.

Collin, Randall, 1994, Four Sociological Traditions. New York: Oxford University Press.

Denzin, Norman, 2001, ‘A reflexive interview and a performative, dialogical social science’ in Qualitative Research. London, Thousand Oaks and New Delhi: SAGE publications.

Geertz, Clifford, 1973, ‘Thick Description: Toward an Interpretive Theory of Culture’ in The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books.

Goffman, Erving, 1956, The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Doubleday.

Goffman, Erving, 1967, Anstalt og Menneske – den totale institution socialt set. Viborg: Jørgen Paludans forlag.

Hviid Jacobsen, Michael and Kristiansen, Søren, 2002, Erving Goffman – sociologien om det elementære livs sociale former. Gylling: Hans Reitzels Forlag.

Kozel, Susan, 2007, Closer: Performance, Technologies, Phenomenology. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Kvale, Steinar, 1997, Interview – En introduktion til det kvalitative forskningsinterview. Gylling: Hans Reitzels Forlag A/S.

Kvale, Steinar, 2005, ‘The dominance of dialogical interview research. A critical view’ in Barn Journal Vol. 3. Oslo: Norsk senter for barneforskning.

Leavy, Peggy, 2009, Methods Meets Art. New York, London: The Guilford Press.

Gerner Nielsen, Inga, 2012, ‘SENSING THE FUTURE’, in ISSUES #2, København: House of Futures.

Gerner Nielsen, Inga, 2012, The Mise en Scène of Research (Master’s Thesis), Department of Arts and Cultural Studies, Copenhagen University.

Merleau-Ponty, Maurice, 2007, ‘The Relations of the Soul and the Body and the Problem of Perceptual Consciousness’ in Toadvine, Ted and Leonar Lawlor eds, The Merleau-Ponty Reader. Chicago: Northwestern University Press.

Jaana, Parviainen, 2000, ‘Bodily Knowledge: Epistemological Reflections on Dance’, in Dance Research Journal Vol 34. No.1, Congress on Research in Dance.

Phelan, Peggy, 1993, ‘The Ontology of Performance: Representation Without Reproduction’ in Unmarked: The Politics of Performance. New York: Routledge.

Polanyi, Michael, 1976, The Tacit Dimension. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd.

Romanyshyn, Robert, 2007, The Wounded Researcher - Research with Soul in Mind. New Orleans, Louisiana: Spring Journal, Inc.

Ramö, Hans, 1999, An Aristotelian Human Time-Space Manifold: from chronochora to kairotopos. Time Society Vol 8. Sage Publications.

Nielsen, Kim, 2006, ‘At performe eller ikke performe – Om interaktivitet i Signa Sørensens 57

beds og The Black Rose Trick’, Peripti Journal Vol 6.

Konstantin, Stanislavskij, 1967, En skuespillers arbejde med sig selv. København: Nyt Nordisk Forlag.

Artworks mentioned

‘Night at the Hospital’ by SIGNA, The Danish Royal Theatre, Turbinehallerne, 2007

‘Okänd, kvinna’ by Anna Odell, The University College of Arts, Craft and Design in Stockholm, 2009

‘Chopins’ Heart / Azyl Fryderyk’ by Poste Restante, co- produced by MAP – Mobile Art Productions, Stockholm, Sweden, 2010, and Teatr Dramatyczny festival Warszawa Centralna “Migrajce”, produced in cooperation with Propaganda Foundation, Warszawa 2010

‘The Crack’ by Fiction Pimps, House of Futures, 2009

‘Seeing Pink Narcissus’ by Inga Gerner Nielsen, with Rasmus Knutzen Nielsen, curated by Iben Elmstrøm, 68 Square metres (today SixtyEight Art Institute), Copenhagen, 2014

‘Your Past Belongs to Them Now’ by Inga Gerner Nielsen in collaboration with TwLetteratura as part of the project EutopiaDystopia, supported by KulturKANTen and Compagnia di Sanpaolo, Vendsyssels Teater, 2018, and Polo del ´900, Turin, 2019

‘Four American Characters’ by Anna Deavere Smith, TED Conferences LLC 2005

Downloads

Publiceret

2021-01-24

Citation/Eksport

Gerner Nielsen, I. (2021). The Interview as Convergent Point *: Between Qualitative Research and Performance Art. Peripeti, 18(33), 55–76. https://doi.org/10.7146/peri.v18i33.124663