Kreativitet og videnspolitik
Perspektiver på kreativitetsbegrebets indtog i og relevans for universitetets vidensproduktion
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/peri.v9iS4.110572Nøgleord:
Kreativitetsbegrebet, kreativitet og videnResumé
In recent years, the discourse on the university and its societal role has seen an increase in the use of the concepts of creativity and knowledge in tandem. By arguing that Lyotard’s “The Postmodern Condition” seems to have prefigured – and to some extent even influenced – a conception of the creative aspects of knowledge production, concurrent with the rethinking of creativity in numerous other fields, this paper analyses the reason why this conceptual interconnectedness has suddenly occurred.
Jan Løhmann Stephensen åbner teorianalytisk med artiklen “Kreativitet og videnspolitik – perspektiver på kreativitetsbegrebets indtog i og relevans for universitetets vidensproduktion”. Artiklen giver en indføring i kreativitetsbegrebet ved at stille skarpt på den måde, som kreativitet og viden i de senere år er blevet vævet ind i hinanden i diskursen om universitetet og dets samfundsmæssige rolle. I artiklen analyserer Løhmann baggrunden for denne konceptuelle sammensmeltning og lancerer et bud på, hvordan videnskabens tiltagende skabende karakter skal forstås.
Referencer
Banks, John & Deuze, Mark, 2009. Co-creative Labour. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 12 (5).
Barthes, Roland, 1996. Den ny Citroën. Mytologier. Kbh.: Gyldendal.
Bauer, Martin, red., 1995. Resistance to New Technology: Nuclear Power, Information Technology, Biotechnology. Cambridge University Press,.
Bauer, Martin W. & Gaskell, George, 2008. Social Representations Theory: A Progressive Research Programme for Social Psychology. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 38 (4).
Bell, Daniel, 1976. The Coming of Post-Industrial Society. New York: Basic Books.
Benkler, Yochai, 2006. The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom. New Haven & London: Yale University Press.
Beuys, Joseph, 1974. I Am Searching for Field Character. In: Joachimides & Rosenthal, red. Art into Society, Society into Art. London: Institute of Contemporary Arts.
Beuys, Joseph, 1974. Manifesto on the foundation of a ‘Free International School for Creativity and Interdisciplinary Research’. In: Joachimides & Rosenthal, red. Art into Society, Society into Art. London: Institute of Contemporary Arts.
Bilton, Chris, 2007. Management and Creativity: From Creative Industries to Creative Management. Malden, Oxford & Carlton: Blackwell.
Bilton, Chris, 2010. Manageable Creativity. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 16 (3).
Bilton, Chris, 2011. The Management of Creative Industries: From Content to Context. In: Deuze, red. Managing Media Work. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Botting, Fred, 2004. Culture, Litterature, Information. In: Callus & Herbrechter, red. Post-Theory, Culture, Criticism. Amsterdam & New York, Rodopi.
Bruns, Axel, 2008. Blogs, Wikipedia, Second Life, and Beyond: From Production to Produsage. New York: Peter Lang.
Bröckling, Ulrich, 2006. On Creativity: A Brainstorming Session. Educational Philosophy & Theory, 38 (4).
Bullen, Elizabeth & Robb, Simon, 2004. A Provocation. In: Jane Kenway, Elizabeth Bullen & Simon Robb, red. Innovation & Tradition: The Arts, Humanities and the Knowledge Economy. New York: Peter Lang.
Bürger, Peter, 1984. Theory of the Avant-Garde. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Castoriadis, Cornelius, 1994. Radical Imagination and the Social Instituting Imaginary. In: Robinson & Rundell, red. Rethinking Imagination: Culture and Creativity. London: Routledge.
Chesbrough, Henry W., 2003. Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Boston: Harvard Business School.
Clark, Colin, 1957 (1940). The Conditions of Economic Progress. London: Macmillan.
Coade, Neil, 1997. Be Creative: The Toolkit for Business Success. London & New York: International Thomson Business Press.
Cogburn, D. L., 2003. HCI in the so-called developing world: what’s in it for everyone. Interactions, 10 (2).
Cunningham, Stuart, 2003. The Evolving Creative Industries: From original assumptions to contemporary interpretations. Upubliceret paper. http://eprints.qut.edu.au/4391/ (25. august 2011).
Department of Culture, Media & Sport, 1998. Creative Industries Mapping Document. London: DCMS. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/http://www.culture.gov.uk/reference_library/publications/4740.aspx (19. juni 2011).
Deleuze, Gilles, 2001. Difference and Repetition. London, New York: Continuum.
Dinkla, Söke, 1996. From Participation to Interaction. In Leeson, red. Clicking In: Hot Links to a Digital Culture. Seattle: Bay Press.
Donald, James, 2004. What’s New? A letter to Terry Flew. Continuum: Journal of Media & Cultural Studies, 18 (2).
Drexler, Eric K., 1991. Hypertext Publishing and the Evolution of Knowledge. Social Intelligence, 1 (2).
Drucker, Peter F., 1996 (1957). The Landmarks of Tomorrow: A Report on the New ’Post-Modern’ World. New Brunswick: Transaction Publ. du Gay, Paul, 2007. Hyldest til bureaukratiet: Weber, organisation, etik. Kbh.: Hans Reitzels Forlag.
Dyer-Witheford, Nick, 2005. Cognitive Capitalism and the Contested Campus. In: Cox & Krysa, red. Engineering Culture. New York: Autonomedia.
Etzkowitz, Henry, 2008. The Triple Helix: University-Industry-Government Innovation in Action. New York: Routledge.
Etzkowitz, Henry & Leydesdorff, Loet, 2000. The dynamics of innovation- from National Systems and ‘Mode 2’ to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy, 29.
Fink, Hans, 2003. Hvad er et universitet? In: Fink, Kjærgaard, Kragh & Kristensen, red. Universitet og videnskab. Universitetets idéhistorie, videnskabsteori og etik. Kbh.: Hans Reitzels Forlag.
Flew, Terry, 2004. Creativity, the ‘New Humanism’ and Cultural Studies. Continuum: Journal of Media & Cultural Studies, 18 (2).
Florida, Richard, 1999. The Role of the University: Leveraging Talent, Not Technology. Issues in Science and Technology, 15 (4). http://www.issues.org/15.4/florida.htm (17. juli 2011).
Florida, Richard, 2002. Bohemia and Economic Geography. Journal of Economic Geography, 2 (1).
Florida, Richard, Kevin Stolarick, Gary Gates & Brian Knudsen, 2006. The University and the Creative Economy. http://www.creativeclass.org/rfcgdb/articles/univ_creative_economy082406.pdf (16. juni 2011).
Frank, Thomas, 1997. The Conquest of Cool. Business Culture, Counterculture, and the Rise of Hip Consumerism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hamel, Gary, 2007. The Future of Management. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Howe, Jeff, 2009. Crowdsourcing: Why the Power of the Crowd Is Driving the Future of Business. London: Random House.
Ingold, Tim, 2008. Bringing Things Back to Life: Creative Entanglements in a World of Materials. Arbejdspapir.
http://www.reallifemethods.ac.uk/events/vitalsigns/programme/ingold.htm (15. august 2011).
Jeanes, Emma L., 2006. ’Resisting Creativity, Creating the New’. A Deleuzian Perspective on Creativity. Creativity and Innovation Management, 15 (2).
Jenkins, Henry, 2006. Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide. New York & London: New York University Press.
Kanter, Rosabeth Moss, 1989. When Giants Learn to Dance. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Kao, John, 1996. Jamming: The Art and Discipline of Business Creativity. New York: Harper Business.
Kelty, Christopher M., 2008. Two Bits: The Cultural Significance of Free Software. Durham & London: Duke University Press.
Kline, Ronald, 2005. Resisting Consumer Technology in Rural America: The Telephone and Electrification. In: Oudshoorn & Pinch, red. How Uses Matter: the Co-Construction of Users and Technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kreiss, Daniel, Megan Finn & Fred Turner, 2011. The limits of peer production: Some reminders from Max Weber for the network society. New Media & Society, 13 (2).
Kristensen, Jens Erik, 2008. Kapitalismens nye ånd og økonomiske hamskifte. Dansk Sociologi, 19 (2).
Larsen, Steen Nepper, 2008. Kategoriale tydninger af den kognitive kapitalisme – med særligt henblik på at begribe samtidens trang og tvang til kreativitet. Kbh.: GNOSIS, nr. 3.
Leadbeater, Charles & Paul Miller, 2004. The Pro-Am Revolution. London: Demos.
Leadbeater, Charles, 2008. We-Think: The Power of Mass Creativity. London: Profile Books.
Lessig, Lawrence, 2004. Free Culture: How Big Media Uses Technology and the Law to Lock Down Culture and Control Creativity. New York: Penguin.
Lippard, Lucy, 1997 (1973). Six Years: The Dematerialization of the Art Object. Berkeley & Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Luke, Timothy W., 2005. From Pedagogy to Performativity: The Crisis of Research Universities, Intellectuals, and Scholarly Communication. Telos, 131.
Lyotard, Jean-Francois, 1996 (1979). Viden og det postmoderne samfund. Aarhus: Slagmark.
Maslow, Abraham, 1954. Motivation and Personality. New York: Harper Row.
Mason, John Hope, 1988. The Character of Creativity: Two Traditions. Journal of European Ideas, 9 (6).
McGregor, Douglas, 1957. The Human Side of Enterprise. The Management Review, 46 (11).
Mehlsen, Camilla, 2011. Farvel til fabriksundervisning, goddag til fremtidens fleksible læring. Asteriks, 59.
Mumford, Michael D., 1991. Leaders as Creators: Leader Performance and Problem Solving in Ill-Defined Domains. Leadership Quarterly, 2 (4).
O’Reilly, Tim, 2005. What is Web 2.0? Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software. http://oreilly.com/web2/archive/what-is-web-20.html (16. august 2011).
Oudshoorn, Nelly & Pinch, Trevor, 2005. Introduction: How Users and Non-Users Matter. In: idem., red. How Uses Matter: the Co-construction of Users and Technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Pedersen, Kristoffer Holm, 2007. Interview: Hvad er meningen?: ‘Fremtiden ligger i det sanderske universitet’. Interview med Helge Sander. Politiken, 4. juni 2007.
Peters, Michael A., 2007. Opening the Book: (From the Closed to the Open Text). The International Journal of the Book, 5 (1).
Peters, Michael A., 2009. Education, Creativity and the Economy of Passions: New Forms of Educational Capitalism. Thesis Eleven, 96.
Peters, Michael A., 2010. Three Forms of the Knowledge Economy: Learning, Creativity and Openness. British Journal of Educational Studies, 58 (1).
Peters, Michael A. & Besley, Tina (A.C.), 2009. Academic Enterpreneurship and the Creative Economy. In: Peters, Marginson & Murphy, red. Creativity and the Global Knowledge Economy. New York: Peter Lang Publ.
Peters, Tom, 1998. The Circle of Innovation. New York: Alfred A. Knopf Inc.
Pine II, B. Joseph & Gilmore, James H., 1999. The Experience Economy: Work Is Theatre & Every Business a Stage. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Prahalad, C.K. & Ramaswamy, Venkatram, 2002. The Co-Creation Connection. Strategy+Business, 27. http://www.strategy-business.com/article/18458?gko=f472b (29. juni 2011).
Readings, Bill, 1996. The University in Ruins. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Rhodes Mel, 1987 (1961). An Analysis of Creativity. In: Scott G. Isaksen, red. Frontiers of Creativity Research. Buffalo: Bearly Limited.
Rickards, Tudor & Moger, Susan, 2006. Creative Leaders: A Decade of Contributions from Creativity and Innovation Management Journal. Creativity and Innovation Management, 15 (1).
Roberts, John, 2007. The Intangibilities of Form: Skill and Deskilling in Art After the Readymade. London & New York: Verso.
Ross, Andrew, 2009. Nice Work If You Can Get It: Life and Labor in Precarious Times. New York: New York University Press.
Ruch, Richard S., 2001. Higher Ed, Inc: The Rise of the For Profit University. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
Saveri, Andrea, Howard Rheingold & Kathi Vian, 2005. Technologies of Cooperation. Palo Alto: Institute for the Future.
Slaughter, Sheila, 1999. Academic Capitalism: Politics, Policies and the Entrepreneurial University. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
Smith, Chris, 1998. Creative Britain. London: Faber & Faber.
Stallman, Richard M., 2010. Free Software, Free Society: Selected Essays of Richard M. Stallman. Boston: Free Software Foundation.
Stephensen, Jan Løhmann, 2010. Kapitalismens ånd & den kreative etik. Aarhus: Digital Aesthetics Research Center.
Stephensen, Jan Løhmann, 2011. The Creative Public: Democratic or Productive?. In: Andersen, Lund &
Cox, red. Nyhedsavisen: Public Interfaces. Aarhus: Digital Aesthetics Research Center. Stephensen, Jan Løhmann, 2012. Kreativ kapitalisme: nye værdier, nye teknologier og nye diskurser. Raffnsøe-Møller, Thorup, Larsen & Hansen, red. Kapitalismens ansigter. Aarhus: Philosophia (in press).
Sternberg, Robert J., 2005. Creativity or Creativities?. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 63 (4-5).
Strannegård, Lars, 2002. Nothing Compares to the New. In: Holmberg, Salze-Mörling & Strannegård, red. Stuck in the Future? Tracing ’the New Economy’. Stockholm: Bookhouse Publ.
Surowiecki, James, 2004. The Wisdom of Crowds: Why the Many Are Smarter Than the Few and How Collective
Wisdom Shapes Business, Economies, Societies and Nations. New York: Doubleday.
Tapscott, Don & Anthony D. Williams, 2006. Wikinomics: How Mass Collaboration Changes Everything. New York: Portfolio.
Tapscott, Don & Anthony D. Williams, 2010. Macrowikinomics: Rebooting Business and the World. New York: Portfolio.
Tigerstedt, E. N., 1968. The Poet as Creator: Origins of a Metaphor. Comparative Literature Studies, 5 (4).
Veluxfonden, 2011. To projekter skal tage temperaturen på humanistisk forskning. http://www.veluxfonden.dk/C12576AB0041534D/0/3EA87105EA8FE6E7C12578BF004B1B2A?open (15. august 2011).
Venturelli, Shalini, 2000. From the Information Economy to the Creative Economy: Moving Culture to the Center of International Public Policy. Washington: The Center for Arts and Culture. von Hentig, Hartmut, 1999. Kreativitet: høje forventninger til et vagt begreb. Kbh.: Hans Reitzels Forlag.
Waldrop, M. Mitchell, 2008. Science 2.0: Great New Tool, or Great Risk?. Scientific American, 298 (5).
http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=science-2-point-0-great-new-tool-or-great-risk (17. june 2011).
Weisberg, Robert W., 1986. Creativity: Genius and Other Myths. New York: W. H. Freeman & co.
Whyte, William H., 1956. The Organization Man. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Wulf, William, 1993. The Collaboratory Opportunity. Science, 261 (5123).
Wyatt, Sally, 2005. Non-Users Also Matter: The Construction of Users and Non-Users of the Internet“. In: Oudshoorn & Pinch, red. How Uses Matter: the Co-construction of Users and Technology, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Downloads
Publiceret
Citation/Eksport
Nummer
Sektion
Licens
Det følgende vedrører alle Peripeti-udgivelser fra 2024, nr. 39, og senere:
Peripeti er et Diamond Open Access-tidsskrift, der giver direkte open acces til publiceret indhold ud fra princippet om, at det at gøre forskning frit tilgængelig for offentligheden understøtter en større global udveksling af viden.
Forfattere skal ikke betale for indsendelse, redigering eller offentliggørelse af artikler.
Forfattere, der bidrager til Peripeti, bevarer ophavsretten til deres artikler.
Forfattere accepterer at udgive artikler under en Creative Commons CC-BY-NC 4.0-licens. Vilkårene for denne licens tillader brugere frit at kopiere og videredistribuere materialet i ethvert medie eller format og at tilpasse, transformere og bygge videre på materialet, så længe der gives passende kreditering, et link til licensen gives, og eventuelle ændringer angives. Brugere må ikke dele eller tilpasse materialet til kommercielle formål uden samtykke fra licensgiveren. Brugen af licensen må ikke på nogen måde antyde, at licensgiveren støtter tredjeparten eller dennes brug. Licensen kan ikke tilbagekaldes.
Forfattere opfordres til at lægge deres artikler ud på personlige og/eller institutionelle hjemmesider for at sikre endnu større offentlig adgang efter udgivelsen. Forfattere har ret til at arkivere deres artikler i fondes og offentlige institutioners arkiver, men Peripeti anmoder om, at forfattere bruger et direkte link til den publicerede artikel på tidsskriftets hjemmeside, når det er muligt, da Peripeti som en ikke-kommerciel, offentligt finansieret udgiver er afhængig af niveauet af brugeraktivitet på tidsskriftets hjemmeside.
Vedrørende tidligere udgivelser, indtil 2024, herunder nr. 38:
Ophavsretten deles mellem Peripeti og forfatteren/forfatterne. Tidsskriftet er et open access-tidsskrift, der giver direkte adgang til alt indhold baseret på princippet om, at det at gøre forskning frit tilgængelig for offentligheden understøtter en større global udveksling af viden. Brugere kan frit kopiere og dele materiale i ethvert medie eller format, så længe der gives passende kreditering. Enhver anden brug kræver skriftligt samtykke fra indehaverne af ophavsretten.