Is AI good for agency

Editorial

Authors

  • Maria Hvid Stenalt
  • Roland Hachmann

Abstract

This special issue addresses pressing questions related to the interaction between education technology and agency and motivation: how are teacher and student agency and motivation affected by education technology, and how do technology and institutional decision-making and implementation take student and teacher agency and motivation into account?

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Børne- og Undervisningsministeriet. (2024, Ekspertgruppe klar med anbefalinger for brug af ChatGPT ved prøver. Retrieved May 22, 2024, from https://www.uvm.dk/aktuelt/nyheder/uvm/2024/april/240424-ekspertgruppe-klar-med-anbefalinger-for-brug-af-chatgpt-ved-proever

Brod, G., Kucirkova, N., Shepherd, J., Jolles, D., & Molenaar, I. (2023). Agency in Educational Technology: Interdisciplinary Perspectives and Implications for Learning Design. Educational Psychology Review, 35(1), 25. 10.1007/s10648-023-09749-x

Chiu, T. K. F., Xia, Q., Zhou, X., Chai, C. S., & Cheng, M. (2023). Systematic literature review on opportunities, challenges, and future research recommendations of artificial intelligence in education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, 100118.10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100118

Crompton, H., & Burke, D. (2023). Artificial intelligence in higher education: the state of the field. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 22.

Damşa, C.,I., Kirschner, P. A., Andriessen, J. E. B., Erkens, G., & Sins, P. H. M. (2010). Shared epistemic agency: An empirical study of an emergent construct. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19(2), 143-186.

Damşa, C., Langford, M., Uehara, D., & Scherer, R. (2021). Teachers’ agency and online education in times of crisis. Computers in Human Behavior, 121, 106793. 10.1016/j.chb.2021.106793

Darvishi, A., Khosravi, H., Sadiq, S., Gašević, D., & Siemens, G. (2024). Impact of AI assistance on student agency. Computers & Education, 210, 104967. 10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104967

Edwards, A. (2005). Relational agency: Learning to be a resourceful practitioner. International Journal of Educational Research, 43(3), 168-182.

European Council. (2024, May 21,). Artificial intelligence (AI) act: Council gives final green light to the first worldwide rules on AI. Retrieved May 22, 2024, from https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/pressreleases/2024/05/21/artificial-intelligence-ai-act-council-gives-final-green-light-to-the-first-worldwide-ruleson-ai/

Jin, S., Im, K., Yoo, M., Roll, I., & Seo, K. (2023). Supporting students’ self-regulated learning in online learning using artificial intelligence applications. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 37. 10.1186/s41239-023-00406-5

Lodge, J. M., Howard, S., Bearman, M., Dawson, P., Agostinho, S., Buckingham Shum, S., Deneen, C., Ellis, C.,

Fawns, T., & Gniel, H. (2023). Assessment reform for the age of artificial intelligence. (). https://www.teqsa.gov.au/sites/default/files/2023-09/assessment-reform-age-artificial-intelligencediscussion-paper.pdf

Luo, H., Yang, T., Xue, J., & Zuo, M. (2019). Impact of student agency on learning performance and learning experience in a flipped classroom. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(2), 819-831.

Marín, V.,I., de Benito, B., & Darder, A. (2020). Technology-Enhanced Learning for Student Agency in Higher Education: a Systematic Literature Review. Interaction Design and Architecture(s) Journal IxD&A, 45, 15-49.

Miao, F. (2024, June 10,). A taxonomy on human agency in designing and using AI. LinkedInd. Retrieved June 13, 2024, from https://www.linkedin.com/in/fengchun-miao-5b999077/

Moallem, M. (2019). Effects of PBL on learning outcomes, knowledge acquisition, and higher-order thinking skills. The Wiley Handbook of Problem-Based Learning, , 107-133.

Muukkonen, H., Lakkala, M., & Hakkarainen, K. (2005). Technology-Mediation and Tutoring: How Do They Shape Progressive Inquiry Discourse? Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14(4), 527-565.10.1207/s15327809jls1404_3

Neumann, J. W. (2013). Developing a new framework for conceptualizing “student-centered learning”. Paper presented at the The Educational Forum, , 77(2) 161-175.

Nguyen, A., Ngo, H. N., Hong, Y., Dang, B., & Nguyen, B. T. (2023). Ethical principles for artificial intelligence in education. Education and Information Technologies, 28(4), 4221-4241. 10.1007/s10639-022-11316-w

Nøhr, L., Stenalt, M. H., & Hagood, D. (2023). University Teachers’ Agency in Relation to Technology Use in Teaching: A Quantitative Investigation. Edutec.Revista Electrónica De Tecnología Educativa, (86), 40-61.

Nordic Innovation. (2024, Launch of Nordic Ethical AI Recommendations. Nordic Innovation. Retrieved May 22nd, 2024, from https://www.nordicinnovation.org/events/2024/launch-nordic-ethical-airecommendations OECD. (2019, AI Principles overview. OECD.AI. Retrieved May 22nd, 2024, from https://oecd.ai/en/aiprinciples? ref=viden.ai

Pappa, S., Moate, J., Ruohotie-Lyhty, M., & Eteläpelto, A. (2019). Teacher agency within the Finnish CLIL context: tensions and resources. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 22(5), 593-613. 10.1080/13670050.2017.1286292

Perera, P., & Lankathilaka, M. (2023). AI in higher education: A literature review of chatgpt and guidelines for responsible implementation. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 7(6), 306- 314.

Pischetola, M., Stenalt, M. H., Nøhr, L., Hagood, D. E., & Misfeldt, M. (2024). Desirable and realistic futures of the university: a mixed-methods study with teachers in Denmark. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(1), 29.

Rudolph, J., Tan, S., & Tan, S. (2023). ChatGPT: Bullshit spewer or the end of traditional assessments in higher education? Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 6(1), 342-363.

Sawyer, R., Smith, A., Rowe, J., Azevedo, R., & Lester, J. (2017). Is more agency better? The impact of student agency on game-based learning. Paper presented at the Artificial Intelligence in Education: 18th International Conference, AIED 2017, Wuhan, China, June 28–July 1, 2017, Proceedings 18, 335-346.

Starkey, L. (2019). Three dimensions of student-centred education: a framework for policy and practice. Critical Studies in Education, 60(3), 375-390.

Stenalt, M. H. (2021). Digital Student Agency: Approaching Agency in Digital Contexts from a Critical Perspective. Frontline Learning Research, 9(3), 52-68.

Tan, S. C., Lee, A. V. Y., & Lee, M. (2022). A systematic review of artificial intelligence techniques for collaborative learning over the past two decades. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100097.10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100097

Toom, A., Pietarinen, J., Soini, T., & Pyhältö, K. (2017). How does the learning environment in teacher education cultivate first year student teachers' sense of professional agency in the professional community? Teaching and Teacher Education, 63, 126-136.

Tsamados, A., Floridi, L., & Taddeo, M. (2024). Human control of AI systems: from supervision to teaming. AI and Ethics, , 1-14.

Winne, P. H. (2006). How software technologies can improve research on learning and bolster school reform. Educational Psychologist, 41(1), 5-17.

Yang, Y., Luo, J., Yang, M., Yang, R., & Chen, J. (2023). From surface to deep learning approaches with Generative AI in higher education: an analytical framework of student agency. Studies in Higher Education, 20(37), 1-14. 10.1080/03075079.2024.2327003

Yu, H. (2023). Reflection on whether Chat GPT should be banned by academia from the perspective of education and teaching. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1181712.

Downloads

Published

2024-06-17 — Updated on 2024-06-25

How to Cite

Stenalt , M. H., & Hachmann, R. (2024). Is AI good for agency: Editorial. Tidsskriftet Læring Og Medier (LOM), 17(29). Retrieved from https://tidsskrift.dk/lom/article/view/146773