Vi kan skabe sporet sammen

Studerende som medudviklere af læringsdesignet for deres egen uddannelse

Authors

  • Louise Lund Breil UCN Pædagogik - pædagoguddannelsen Thisted
  • Marianne Georgsen
  • Susanne Dau

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7146/lom.v17i30.143093

Abstract

The article presents a project where the goal is to establish an equal collaboration between teacher and students regarding the learning design of the students' education. The work with learning design (cf. Dohn et al., 2019), is based on Fawns' formulation of an Entangled Pedagogy, which i.a. focuses on the students' participation in the design work. Based on post-structuralism (Juelskjær & Plauborg, 2013; Søndergaard, 2005; Focault, 2002), qualitative, empirical data (focus group interviews) are analysed to uncover the student perspective on the overall research question: What characterizes the students' contribution when invited to co-develop the learning design for their education?

The purpose is two-fold: Firstly, to qualify our knowledge of possibilities and limitations in involving students directly in learning design processes, and secondly, to test a development and analysis method which focuses on the participants' narratives in the empirical material. It is concluded that this method for involving the students in the design process is fruitful in terms of elucidating the students' values in connection with their education. Finally, methodological perspectives concerning a teaching practice, where students are invited throughout the entire educational process, cf. Fawns, to take co-responsibility for the learning design, are discussed.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Andenæs, A. (2000). Generalisering. Om ringvirkninger og gjenbruk av resultater fra en kvalitativ undersøkelse. I: H. Haavind (red.) Kjønn og fortolkende metode. Metodiske muligheter i kvalitativ forskning (s. 287-320). Gyldendal Norsk Forlag.

Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Duke University Press

Biesta, G.J.J. (2019). Letting Art Teach: Art Education After Joseph Beuys. ArtEZ Press.

Bloksgaard, L., & Andersen, P. T. (2012). Fokusgruppeinterviewet: Når gruppedynamikken er redskabet. I M.H. Jacobsen & SQ. Jensen (red.), Kvalitative udfordringer(s. 25-44). Hans Reitzels Forlag.

Breil, L. L. (2023). Isbryderen: Kan en legende tilgang til læring bryde fastfrosne forståelser og opleves af de studerende som et værdifuldt bidrag til deres uddannelse og praksis? UCN Perspektiv, (12), 59–68. https://doi.org/10.17896/UCN.perspektiv.n12.531

Børne-og undervisningsministeriet (2023). Vejledning om Pulje til mere uddannet pædagogisk personale (opkvalificeringspuljen). https://www.uvm.dk/-/media/filer/uvm/puljer-priser-udbud/pdf23/231009-vejledning-om-opkvalificeringspuljen-2023--2025.pdf

Christensen, G. (2005). Etiske konstruktioner i det kvalitative forskningsinterview. I Jensen, T.B. & Christensen, G. (red.). Psykologiske og pædagogiske metoder -Kvalitative og kvantitative forskningsmetoder i praksis (s.s. 293-317). Roskilde Universitetsforlag.

Dalziel, J., Conole, G., Wills, S., Walker, S., Bennett, S., Dobozy, E., Cameron, L., Badilescu-Buga E. og Bower, M.l (2016) The Larnaca Declaration on Learning Design. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2016(1): 7, pp. 1–24, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/jime.407

Dohn, N. B., Godsk, M., & Buus, L. (2019). Learning Design: Tilgange, cases og karakteristika. Tidsskriftet Læring Og Medier(LOM), 12(21), 20. https://doi.org/10.7146/lom.v12i21.112639

Dohn, N. B. & Hansen, J. (2016). Begrebet didaktisk design –et kritisk overblik over betydninger. I N. B.

Dohn og J. Hansen (Red), Didaktik, design og digitalisering(s. 43-64). Samfundslitteratur

Fawns, T. (2019). Postdigital Education in Design and Practice. Postdigital Science and Education, 1 132–145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-018-0021-8

Fawns, T. (2022). An Entangled Pedagogy: Looking Beyond the Pedagogy—Technology Dichotomy. Postdigital Science and Education, (4), 711–728. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-022-00302-7

Foucault, M. (2002). The archaeology of knowledge, and the discourse on language. Pantheon Books.

Haavind, H. (1987). Liten og stor: mødres omsorg og barns utviklingsmuligheter. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.

Halkier, B. (2002). Fokusgrupper. Roskilde, Denmark: Samfundslitteratur.

Hiim, H., & Hippe, E. (2015). Læring gennem oplevelse, forståelse og handling: en studiebog ididaktik (2. udgave). Gyldendal.

Højgaard, L., & Søndergaard, D. M. (2015). Multimodale konstitueringsprocesser i empirisk forskning. I S. Brinkmann & L. Tanggaard, (Red.). Kvalitative Metoder: En grundbog.København. Hans Reitzel: 315-339.

Juelskjær, M. & Plauborg, H. (2013). Læring og didaktik udsat for poststrukturalistisk tænkning. I A. Qvortrup & M. Wiberg (red.). Læringsteori og didaktik(s. 257-287). København: Hans Reitzels Forlag.

Published

2024-09-24 — Updated on 2024-09-26

How to Cite

Lund Breil, L., Georgsen, M., & Dau, S. (2024). Vi kan skabe sporet sammen: Studerende som medudviklere af læringsdesignet for deres egen uddannelse. Tidsskriftet Læring Og Medier (LOM), 17(30). https://doi.org/10.7146/lom.v17i30.143093

Issue

Section

LOM30: Sammensatte læringsrum