Blended Learning – frem mod en ny normal på ungdomsuddannelserne

Authors

  • Michael Lund-Larsen Det Nationale Videncenter for e-læring
  • Søren Jørgensen Det Nationale Videncenter for e-læring
  • Bent B. Andresen Aarhus Universitet

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7146/lom.v14i24.125678

Keywords:

blended learning, corona, ungdomsuddannelser

Abstract

The concern of this article is a change in the prerequisites to implement blended learning in Danish youth education. The empirical research focuses on attitudes and experiences among teachers who employed a mix of theories and methods as well as digital technologies to enhance student learning outcome during the first period of the Covid-19 lockdown. The article presents analysed results of a survey on 55 institutions. The conclusion is that 6 out of 10 teachers have become digital innovative. In an extraordinary situation, they have been capable of exploiting technological opportunities and gained experience with new ways to guide students and practice differentiated teaching together with alternatives to directed, teacher centered teaching. The teachers anticipate to transfer their newly gained experience to their future tuition when lockdown limitations are a thing of the past. This points to blended learning as a new normal with digital innovative teachers as visionary trendsetters in every school. When school managers provide the right conditions for experimentation and sharing of knowledge, they also enable the visions of digital innovative teachers to unfold in the schools.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Michael Lund-Larsen, Det Nationale Videncenter for e-læring

Centerchef

Søren Jørgensen, Det Nationale Videncenter for e-læring

Specialkonsulent

Bent B. Andresen, Aarhus Universitet

DPU, Uddannelsesvidenskab, Lektor, Ph.d.

References

Cronje, J.C. (2020). “Towards a New Definition of Blended Learning”, i The Electronal Journal of e-Learning, 18(2), s. 114-121.

Dau, S. (2020). “Læring på og i Blended Learning”, i Tidsskriftet Læring og Medier (LOM), 12(22) 23.

DEA og eVidenCenter (2020). Fjernundervisningstemperatur. Rapport udgivet af Det Nationale Videncenter for e-læring og Tænketanken DEA.

Demetriou, C., Ozer, B. U., & Essau, C. (2015). “Self-report questionnaires”, i R. Cautin, & S. Lilienfeld (red.), The Encyclopedia of Clinical Psychology. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Duch, H. S. (2012). Hvorfor er det så svært at arbejde med undervisningsdifferentering. Danske Professionhøjskoler.

EVA (2020). Digitale teknologier i undervisningen på ungdomsuddannelserne – Lærernes overvejelser om til- og fravalg. Notat udgivet af Danmarks Evalueringsinstitut.

Gadamer, H.-G. (2000). Teoriens lovprisning – taler og artikler. Aarhus: Systime.

Georgsen, Marianne og Qvortrup, A. (red.) (2021). Erfaringer og oplevelser med online undervisning på 9 videregående uddannelsesinstitutioner i foråret 2020. Rapport i digital version.

Given, Lisa (2008). ”Convenience Sample”, i The SAGE Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods. SAGE Publications. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781412963909.n68.

GL (2019), Gymnasielærere i tal 2019. Rapport i digital version. Rapporten er tilgængelig her.

GL (2020). Virtuel undervisning – Lærernes erfaringer. Medlemsundersøgelse udgivet i rapport af Gymnasieskolernes Lærerforening.

Hansen, J. (2012). ”Tema 2: At designe e-læring - didaktiske perspektiver på uddannelsesdesign og didaktiske design”, i Tidsskriftet Læring og Medier (LOM), 5(9)

Hattie, J. (2013). Synlig læring – for lærere. Dafolo

Kruuse, Emil (2007). Kvalitative forskningsmetoder – i psykologi og beslægtede fag. København Ø: Dansk Psykologisk Forlag.

Kruuse, Emil (1999). Kvantitative forskningsmetoder. I psykologi og tilgrænsende fag. København Ø: Dansk Psykologisk Forlag

Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., & Bakia, M. (2013). The effectiveness of online and blended learning: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Teachers College Record Volume 115. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.

Meyer, H. (2014). Hvad er god undervisning? København: Gyldendals Lærerbibliotek.

NCE (2020). Onlineundervisning under coronakrisen. Rapport udgivet af Nationalt Center for Erhvervspædagogik, Københavns Professionshøjskole.

Nordahl, T. m.fl. (2010). Uligheder og variationer – Danske elevers motivation, skolefagligt læringsudbytte og sociale kompetencer. University College Nordjylland.

OECD. (2015), Schooling redesigned: Towards innovative learning systems – educational research and innovation. Paris: OECD Publishing.

Paulhus, Delroy L., Vazire, Simine (2007). “The Self-Report Method”, i Fraley, Chris, Krueger, Robert og Robins, Richard (red.) Handbook of Research Methods in Personality Psychology. London: The Guilford Press.

Qvortrup, A. m.fl. (2020). Nødundervisning under corona-krise - et elev- og forældreperspektiv. Samlet datarapport fra april 2020. DPU, Aarhus Universitet, SDU.

Redanz, Mille (2018). ”På to år: erhvervsskoler har fyret hver 10. lærer”, digital artikel i Fagbladet 3F.

Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations. Fifth Edition. New York: Free Press.

SchoolEducationGateway (2020). Brugerundersøgelse om online læring – Resultater.

Downloads

Published

2021-08-25

How to Cite

Lund-Larsen, M., Jørgensen, S., & Andresen, B. B. (2021). Blended Learning – frem mod en ny normal på ungdomsuddannelserne. Tidsskriftet Læring Og Medier (LOM), 14(24). https://doi.org/10.7146/lom.v14i24.125678