”Vi ved godt, at det bare er på ’note-plan´” - Studerendes digitale læringsstrategier i peer feedback via Screencast
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/lom.v13i23.122012Keywords:
Peer feedback, Screencast; digtial læringsstrategi; dialog;Abstract
Screencast is a digital format allowing for both visual and auditive feedback on texts. Former research indicates that Screencast qualifies teacher feedback to students, however, it has not been investigated how learning designs support the use of Screencast in peer feedback and how students actually use it. In analyses of 10 authentic student Screencasts we investigate their digital learning strategies as they balance positive and negative feedback. Using Bakhtin’s conception of dialogue together with Goffman’s face-work theory we identify three strategies they use in their dialogue with the text and the recipient they imagine. These strategies reveal how students negotiate their relationship and academic identity multimodally in-interaction with the text and their peers. Evidently, students try to be a qualified academic and at the same time a loyal peer student in peer feedback. We conclude that students’ digital learning strategies have potential to develop their professional, digital and work related competences.
Downloads
References
Aghaee, N., & Keller, C. (2016). ICT-supported peer interaction among learners in Bachelor's and Master's thesis courses. Computers & Education, 94, 276-297.
Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The Dialogic Imagination. Four Essays. Austin & London: University of Texas Press.
Bjørndal, C. (2012). Veilederes møte med seg selv. Betydningen av videoopptak og transkripsjon som utviklingsredskap. In A. Ulvestad & F. Kärki (Eds.), Flerstemt veiled-ning (pp. 335-355). Oslo: Gyldendal.
Brousseau, G. (1998). Théorie des situation didactiques. Grenoble: La pensée sauvage. Coll.Researches en didactique et matématiques.
Buber, M. (2004). I and Thou. London: Continuum.
Cunningham, K. J. (2019). Student Perceptions and Use of Technology-Mediated Text and SC Feedback in ESL Writing. Computers and Composition, 52, 222-241.
Dalsgaard, C., & Paulsen, M. F. (2009). Transparency in Cooperative Online Education. International Review of Research in Open & Distance Learning, 10(3), 1-22.
Dysthe, O. (2003). Dialog, samspil og læring. Århus, Forlaget Klim.
dLu, R., & Bol, L. (2007). A comparison of anonymous versus identifiable e-peer review on college student writing performance and the extent of critical feedback. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 6(2), 100-115.
Dohn, N. (2007). IT-baserede læreprocesser – nogle muligheder og nogle begrænsninger. Dansk Universitetspædagogisk Tidsskrift, 2(4), 41-49.
Frank, A. (2005). What is dialogical research and why should we do it? Qualitative Health Research, 15(7), 964–974.
Goffman, E. (1959). Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Double Day Anchor.
Goffman, E. (1972). On Face-work: an Analysis of Ritual Elements in Social Interaction. In J. Laver & S. Hutcheson (Eds.), Communication in Face to Face Interaction (pp. 319-346). London: Penquin Books.
Gore, J. M. (1995). On the Continuity of Power Relations in Pedagogy. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 5(2), 165-188.
Hattie, J. A. and G. M. Donoghue (2016). "Learning strategies: a synthesis and conceptual model." npj Science of Learning 1(16013). Igland, M.-A., & Dysthe, O. (2003). Mikhail Bakhtin og sociokulturel teori. In O. Dysthe (Ed.), Dialog, samspil og læring (pp. 109-124). Århus: Forlaget Klim.
Irwin, B. (2019). Enhancing Peer Feedback Practices through SCs in Blended Academic Writing Courses. JALT CALL Journal, 15(1), 43-59.
Jaber, R., & Kennedy, E. (2017). "Not the Same Person Anymore": Groupwork, Identity and Social Learning Online. Distance Education, 38(2), 216-229.
Killingback, C., Ahmed, O., & Williams, J. (2019). ‘It was all in your voice’ - Tertiary student perceptions of alternative feedback modes (audio, video, podcast, and SC): A qualitative literature review. Nurse Education Today, 72, 32-39. 2
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (2003). Situeret læring - og andre tekster. København: Hans Reitzels Forlag.
Lerner, G. (1996). Finding "Face" in the Preference Structures of Talk-in-Interaction. Social Psychology Quarterly, 59(4), 303-321.
Lillejord, S., & Dysthe, O. (2008). Productive learning spaces - a theoretical discussion based on two cases. Journal of Education and Work, 21(1), 75-89.
Lundstrom, K., & Baker, W. (2009). To give is better than to receive: The benefits of peer review to the reviewer's own writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 18(1), 30-43.
Mahoney, P., Macfarlane, S., & Ajjawi, R. (2019). A Qualitative Synthesis of Video Feedback in Higher Education. Teaching in Higher Education, 24(2), 157-179.
McGarr, O., & Clifford, A. M. (2013). 'Just enough to make you take it seriously': exploring students' attitudes towards peer assessment. Higher Education, 65(6), 677-693.
Nicol, D., Thomson, A., & Breslin, C. (2014). Rethinking feedback practices in higher education: a peer review perspective. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(1), 102-122.
Nordentoft, H. M. (2015). Linedans på video. Vejlederforum, 8(4).
Nordentoft, H. M., & Olesen, B. R. (2014). Kommunikation i kontekst. København: Munksgaards Forlag.
Nordentoft, H. M., Thomsen, R., & Wichmann-Hansen, G. (2013a). Collective academic supervision: a model for participation and learning in higher education. Higher Education, 65(5), 581-593.
Nordentoft, H. M., Thomsen, R., & Wichmann-Hansen, G. (2013b). Collective academic supervision: a model for participation and learning in higher education. Higher Education, 65(5), 581-593.
Nuthall, G. (2005). The cultural myths and realities of classroom teaching and learning: A personal journey. Teachers College Record, 107(5), 895-934.
Phillips, L. (2011). The Promise of Dialogue. The dialogic turn in the production and communication of knowledge. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Skagen, K. (2003). Vejledningssamtaler i et Bakhtinsk perspektiv. I O. Dysthe (Ed.), Dialog, samspil og læring (pp. 197-214). Århus: Forlaget Klim.
Thomsen, R., & Nordentoft, H. M. (2012). Kollektiv Akademisk Vejledning - et bud på en ændret organisering af vejledningen på universitetet. Dansk Universitetspædagogisk Tidsskrift, 7(12), 106 - 116.
West, R. E., Jay, J., Armstrong, M., & Borup, J. (2017). “Picturing Them Right in Front of Me”: Guidelines for Implementing Video Communication in Online and Blended Learning. TechTrends, 61(5), 461-469. doi:10.1007/s11528-017-0208-y
Winstone, N. and D. Carless (2019). Implementing peer feedback. Designing Effective Feedback Processes in Higher Education. A Learning-Focused Approach. London, Routledge: 132-148.
Wedel, N. f. (2017). Peer learning. Kbh.: Hans Reitzel.
Wichmann-Hansen, G., Thomsen, R., & Nordentoft, H. (2015). Challenges in Collective Academic Supervision: supervisors’ experiences from a Master Programme in Guidance and Counselling. The International Journal of Higher Education Research, 70(1), 19-33. doi:10.1007/s10734-014-9821-2
Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). "Becoming a Self-Regulated Learner: An Overview." Theory Into Practice 41(2): 64.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Articles published in the Journal of Learning and Media are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 Unported Licens.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication; simultaneously articles are licensend under the Creative Commons Attribution license: Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerviatives (by-nc-nd). Read about this license at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/
---
At LOM.dk, you will also find articles from the discontinued Journal for the Continuing and Further Education of the Danish Universities (UNEV). Note that special rules apply to UNEV articles:
It is the authors and any other copyright holder who have the copyright of articles published under the auspices of UNEV, and access to the articles is contingent on users acknowledging and complying with the associated legal guidelines:
- Users may download and print one copy of any UNEV publication for private studies or research.
- The redistribution of articles or the use of these for revenue-funded activities or commercial purposes are not allowed.
- It is not allowed to distribute the URLs of UNEV articles.
