Det digitale instinkt
Gymnasieelevers digitale praksis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/lom.v13i23.121737Keywords:
digitale kompetencer, digital dannelse, gymnasieelever, digital teknologi, handlingsduelighedAbstract
The objective of the article is to study the digital practice from the perspective of upper secondary students: How do students use digital technologies for school work, and what is their conception of technology? The article presents an empirical study with interviews of 37 students, observational studies in 14 classes, and lived experience descriptions from 100 students that have described situations where they have learned something through use of technologies in school. The study shows that students often use digital technologies in a way that a student names a "digital instinct". Students show a high degree of agency, and the lived experience descriptions provide many examples of students using technologies as a cognitive partner to do assignments that would not have been completed without use of technologies. Students act as "long-time practitioners" that have obtained solid experiences in using digital technologies. Also, the study shows that there are limitations to the digital instinct. The article concludes in a discussion of how an understanding of the digital instinct can be a starting point for further development of students' digital literacy, which calls upon a more reflective and conscious digital student practice with an increased focus on processes and working methods.
Downloads
References
Bereiter, C. & M. Scardamalia (1993). Surpassing ourselves: An inquiry into the nature and implications of expertise. Chicago: Open Court.
boyd, D. (2014). It’s complicated. The social life of networked teens. Yale University Press. http://www.danah.org/books/ItsComplicated.pdf
Brandt, D. (2015). The rise of writing: Redefining mass literacy. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316106372
Braun, V, & Clarke, V. (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology, Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3:2, pp. 77-101.
Bundsgaard, J. (2008). Søgning er læsning. Viden om Laesning, (3), 5-10. https://www.videnomlaesning.dk/media/1560/jeppe_bundsgaard.pdf
Bundsgaard, Jeppe (2017). Digital Dannelse. Aarhus Universitetsforlag.
European Commission (2013), DIGCOMP: A Framework for Developing and Understanding Digital Competence in Europe, Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, http://www.oecd.org/officialdocuments/publicdisplaydocumentpdf/?cote=DSTI/ICCP/IIS%282015%2910/FINAL&docLanguage=En
EVA (2015). It på ungdomsuddannelserne. Danske Evalueringsinstitut. https://www.eva.dk/ungdomsuddannelse/it-paa-ungdomsuddannelserne
Gee, J. P., & Hayes, E. R. (2011). Language and learning in the digital age. Routledge.
Guest, G., MacQueen, K. M., & Namey, E. E. (2011). Applied thematic analysis. Sage.
Hargittai, E. (2010). Digital na(t)ives variation in internet skills and uses among members of the “Net Generation”. Sociological Inquiry, 80(1), 92-113.
Hargittai, E., Fullerton, L., Menchen-Trevino, E., & Thomas, K. Y. (2010). Trust online: Young adults’ evaluation of web content. International Journal of Communication, 4, 468–494.
Howe, N., and W. Strauss. 2000. Millennials rising: The next greatest generation. New York: Vintage Books.
Husserl, E. (2019). Fænomenologiens idé: fem forelæsninger. Kbh.: Hans Reitzels Forlag.
Itō, M. (Red.). (2010). Hanging out, messing around, and geeking out: Kids living and learning with new media. MIT Press.
Kahneman, D. (2007). Grænser for rationel tænkning i forbindelse med vurdering og valg. I: Jørgen Lyhne & Hans Henrik Knoop (red). Positiv psykologi - positiv pædagogik. Kbh: Gyldendal.
Kirschner, P. A., & Hendrick, C. (2020). How learning happens: Seminal works in educational psychology and what they mean in practice. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429061523
Kvale, S. (1997). Interview – En introduktion til det kvalitative forskningsinterview. Hans Reitzels Forlag.
Lumley, T. og Mendelovits, J. (2012) . How well do young people deal with contradictory and unreliable information on line? What the PISA digital reading assessment tells us. Paper presented at the the Annual Conference of the American Educational Research Association (AERA), Vancouver. http://works.bepress.com/juliette_mendelovits/4
Manen, M. v. (2014). Phenomenology of Practice. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press, Inc.
OECD (2005). The Definition and Selection of Key Competencies [Executive Summary], http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/47/61/35070367.pdf
OECD (2015). Students, computers and learning: Making the connection. OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/19963777
OECD (2016), “Skills for a Digital World: 2016 Ministerial Meeting on the Digital Economy Background Report”, OECD Digital Economy Papers, No. 250, OECD Publishing, Paris, http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5jlwz83z3wnw-en
OECD (2019). OECD Future of Education and Skills 2030. OECD Learning Compass 2030. A Series of Concept Notes. OECD. http://www.oecd.org/education/2030-project/teaching-and-learning/learning/learning-compass-2030/OECD_Learning_Compass_2030_Concept_Note_Series.pdf
Ong, W. J. (2002 [original: 1982]). Orality and literacy: The technologizing of the word. Routledge. http://site.ebrary.com/id/10428071
Prensky, M. (2001). Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5): 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1108/10748120110424816
Salomon, G., Perkins, D. N., & Globerson, T. (1991). Partners in Cognition: Extending Human Intelligence with Intelligent Technologies. Educational Researcher, 20(3), 2-9. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X020003002
Schleicher, A. (2019). PISA 2018: Insights and Interpretations. OECD. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/PISA%202018%20Insights%20and%20Interpretations%20FINAL%20PDF.pdf
Selwyn, N. (2011). Education and Technology: Key Issues and Debates. Continuum.
Shaffer, D. W., & Clinton, K. A. (2006). Toolforthoughts: Reexamining Thinking in the Digital Age. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 13(4), 283. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327884mca1304_2
Tapscott, D. (1998). Growing up digital: the rise of the Net generation. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Toyama, Kentaro (2015). Geek Heresy: Rescuing Social Change from the Cult of Technology. Public Affairs.
Turkle, S. (2011). Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other. Basic Books.
Tække, J & Paulsen, M. (2013). Sociale medier i gymnasiet – mellem forbud og ligegyldighed. Unge Pædagoger.
Tække, Jesper & Michael Paulsen (2015). Digital dannelse – udfordringer, erfaringer og perspektiver fra Randers HF & VUC. Unge Pædagoger.
UNESCO (2011) Digital Literacy in Education, http://iite.unesco.org/publications/3214688/
UMV (2017a). Læreplaner 2017 for gymnasiale uddannelser. Undervisningsministeriet. https://www.uvm.dk/gymnasiale-uddannelser/fag-og-laereplaner/laereplaner-2017
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Articles published in the Journal of Learning and Media are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 Unported Licens.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication; simultaneously articles are licensend under the Creative Commons Attribution license: Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerviatives (by-nc-nd). Read about this license at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/
---
At LOM.dk, you will also find articles from the discontinued Journal for the Continuing and Further Education of the Danish Universities (UNEV). Note that special rules apply to UNEV articles:
It is the authors and any other copyright holder who have the copyright of articles published under the auspices of UNEV, and access to the articles is contingent on users acknowledging and complying with the associated legal guidelines:
- Users may download and print one copy of any UNEV publication for private studies or research.
- The redistribution of articles or the use of these for revenue-funded activities or commercial purposes are not allowed.
- It is not allowed to distribute the URLs of UNEV articles.
