Jeg vil have rigtig undervisning! Profiler af blendede learnere i efter- og videreuddannelsen
Profiler af blendede learnere i efter- og videreuddannelsen
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/lom.v12i22.115672Keywords:
Blended learning. Efter- og videreuddannelse., Individualiserede læringsrum.Abstract
Blended Learning is a flexible way of organizing teaching that integrates various forms of asynchronous interaction where students acquire the academic content independently of common time and space. Hence, flexible learning spaces appeal to adult students where a number of individual needs often must be taken into account due to the adult's family and work life. This article presents and discusses the results of a study in post-graduate education at the University College North Jutland in which 45 graduate students participated in testing a blended learning design. The purpose of the study was to identify what is important for adult diploma students when enrolled in a course of education organized as blended learning. The study has identified four different profiles of blended learners. The profiles reflect a variation in the participants' motivation for both learning and for being blended learners. In addition, the profiles show a great variation in the participants' learning approach, as well as the learning conditions and learning experiences they bring along during a blended course of education. The results of the study form the basis for further development of blended learning with learning designs aimed at a higher degree of flexibility and individualized learning spaces.
Downloads
References
Bandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy. Encyclopedia of Human Behavior (vol. 4). Diego California: Academic Press.
Boud, D., Solomon. N. &Symes, C. (2001). New Practices for New Times. I: Boud, D. & Solomon, N. (Eds.),Work-based Learning: A New Higher Education?Buckingham: OpenUniversity Press.
Bourdeaux, R. & Schoenack, L. (2016). Adult Student Expectations and Experiences in an Online Learning Environment. Journal of Continuing Higher Education, 64(3), 152-161.
Christensen, I. F. (2016). Hvordan skabes et læringsdesign, der motiverer og engagerer deltagerne i et online kompetenceudviklingsforløb? . Læring og Medier (LOM), nr. 16. 2016. https://tidsskrift.dk/lom/article/view/24278/21842. Hentet 20.08.2019
Dalsgaard, C. (2011). Personlige læringsmiljøer: Universitetsuddannelse på internettet. Dansk Universitetspædagogisk Tidsskrift, nr. 11, 2011.
Dalsgaard, C. & Gislev, T. (2019). Usynlige studerende i åbne online forløb – nye muligheder for efteruddannelse. Læring og Medier (LOM), nr. 21. 2019. https://tidsskrift.dk/lom/article/view/112700. Hentet 20.08.2019
Daniel, J. (2016). Making Sense of Blended Learning: Treasuring an Older Tradition or Finding a Better Future? https://teachonline.ca
Dau, S. & Konnerup, U. (2016). Engagerende didaktiske design i blendede læringsrum – et grundlag for facilitering af læreprocesser. Tidsskriftet Læring og Medier (LOM), 9(16)
Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R. M. (2017). Self-Determination Theory: Basic Psychological Needs in Motivation, Development and Wellness. New York: The Guilford Press.
Dysthe, O. (2003). Dialog, samspil og læring. Forlaget Klim.
EVA 2011. E-læring og blended learning på VEU-området. Undersøgelse af e-læring og blended learning på enkeltfag på VUC, VVU på erhvervsakademier og diplomuddannelser på professionshøjskoler. København: Danmarks Evalueringsinstitut.
Graham, C. R., Woodfield, W., Harrisonet, J.B. (2013). A framework for institutional adoption and implementation of blended learning in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 18 (2013), pp. 4-14
Gynther, K.(2005). Blended learning. Unge pædagoger, 2005
Gynter, K. (2012). Blended Learning. I Rasmussen, J.(red). Pædagogiske teorier. Billesø & Baltzer lok. 5/6 2014.
Hartman, J. (2005). Funderet teori. Udvikling af teori på empirisk grundlag. Alinea.
Hrastinski, S. (2008). Asynchronous & Synchronous E-Learning -A study of asynchronous and synchronous e-learning methods discovered that each supports different purposes. I:EDUCAUSE QUARTERLY. Number 4, 2008. S. 51-55.
Illeris, K. (2007). Læring. Roskilde Universitetsforlag.
Jahnke, I. (2016). Digital didactical designs: Teaching and learning in cross action spaces. New York: Routledge.
Jarvis, P. (1992). Den menneskelige lærings natur. In: Illeris, K. (Red.), 2000. Tekster om læring. Roskilde Universitetsforlag.
Kennan, S., Bigatel, P., Stockdale, S., & Hoewe, J. (2018). The (Lack of) Influence of Age and Class Standing on Preferred Teaching Behaviors for Online Students. Online Learning, 22(1), 63-181.
Kauffman, H. (2015). A Review of Predictive Factors of Student Success in and Satisfaction with Online Learning. Research in Learning Technology, 23, xx-xx
Kirkegaard, P. O. (2016). Tidsskrift for evaluering i praksis. Cepra-striben, nr. 20 (2016). Center for evaluering i praksis, CEPRA, UCN (p. 80 – 87)
Knowles, M. (2012). Andragogik – en kommende praksis for voksenlæring. In: Illeris, K. (Red.), (2012). 49 tekster om læring. Samfundslitteratur.
Korthagan, F. and Kessels, J. (1999). Linking theory and practice: Changing the pedagogy of teacher education. Educational Researcher, 28(4), 4-17.
Lohr, K. D. & Haley, K. J. (2018). Using Biographical Prompts to Build Community in an Online Grad-uate Course: An Adult Learning Perspective. Adult Learning, 29(1), 11-19.
Matzat, U. (2013). Do blended virtual learning communities enhance teachers’ professional development more than purely virtual ones? A large scale empirical comparison. Computers & Education, 60(1), 40–51.
McLoughlin, C., & Lee, M. (2008). The three Ps of pedagogy for the networked society: Personalization, participation, and productivity. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 20(1), 10–27.
Mølgaard, H. & Qvortrup, A. (2015). Studieaktivitetsmodellen : erfaringer og refleksioner. Systime profession.
Olesen, M. I. K. (2018). Refleksiv praksislæring i virtuelle, transparente læringsmiljøer. Læring og Medier (LOM), nr. 17, 2018.
Oliver, M. & Trigwell, K. (2005). Can ‘Blended Learning’ Be Redeemed? E–Learning, Volume 2, Number 1, 2005
Schroeder, S. M. & Terras, K. L. (2015). Advising Experiences and Needs of Online, Cohort, and Class-room Adult Graduate Learners. NACADA Journal, 35(1), 42-55.
Schwehm, J. S., Lasker-Scott, T., & Elufiede, O. (2017). A Comparison of Learning Outcomes for Adult Students in On-Site and Online Service-Learning. Online Journal of Distance Learning Admin-istration, 20(1).
Shand, K. & Farrelly, S. G. (2018). The Art of Blending: Benefits and Challenges of a Blended Course for Preservice Teachers. Journal of Educators Online. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1168949. Hentet 19.08.2019
Shaw, D., Tham, Y. S. S., Hogle, J., & Koch, J. (2015). Desire: A Key Factor for Successful Online GED Adult Learners. Journal of Research and Practice for Adult Literacy, Secondary, and Basic Education, 4(1), 21-35.
Thistoll, T. & Yates, A. (2016). Improving Course Completions in Distance Education: An Institutional Case Study. Distance Education, 37(2), 180-195.
Torrisi-Steele, G., & Drew, S. (2013). The literature landscape of blended learning in higher education: The need for better understanding of academic blended practice. International Journal for Academic Development, 18(4), 371-383.
Vann, L. S. (2017). Demonstrating Empathy: A Phenomenological Study of Instructional Designers Making Instructional Strategy Decisions for Adult Learners. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 29(2), 233-244.
Wahlgren, B. (2018). Voksenpædagogik. Akademisk Forlag.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Articles published in the Journal of Learning and Media are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 Unported Licens.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication; simultaneously articles are licensend under the Creative Commons Attribution license: Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerviatives (by-nc-nd). Read about this license at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/
---
At LOM.dk, you will also find articles from the discontinued Journal for the Continuing and Further Education of the Danish Universities (UNEV). Note that special rules apply to UNEV articles:
It is the authors and any other copyright holder who have the copyright of articles published under the auspices of UNEV, and access to the articles is contingent on users acknowledging and complying with the associated legal guidelines:
- Users may download and print one copy of any UNEV publication for private studies or research.
- The redistribution of articles or the use of these for revenue-funded activities or commercial purposes are not allowed.
- It is not allowed to distribute the URLs of UNEV articles.
