Distraction and digital media
Multiplexing, not multitasking in the classroom
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/lom.v12i21.111801Abstract
Research shows that multitasking implies that we use more time, remember less, learn less and perform worse than if we single-task.The article: ”Mobile Phones in the Classroom” (Kuznekoff et al. 2015) is worth highlighting as it is one of the most cited articles on multitasking. It shows how damaging written interaction is for learning in teaching situations. But does this mean that social media and written interaction should not be used in teaching? And that social media and written interaction only can harm learning? In this paper we provide a critical review of Kuznekoff et al. (2015). We argue that their laboratory experiment is taken out of real educational context and that this distorts the results they achieve. With a background in medium theory and media didactics we analyze the laboratory experiment and point out its shortcomings. Based on a qualitative real-life action research project we demonstrate that it is possible to set up conditions that make written interaction (through social media like Twitter) beneficial to education. Furthermore, we clear up the issue theoretically by distinguish between and discuss teaching situations in the new medium environment in relation to different kinds of concentration: diffused concentration (multitasking), non diffused concentration (singletasking) on one axis and the use of only one medium (singleplexing) and the use of several media (multiplexing) on another ortigonal axis.
Downloads
References
Aagaard, J. (2018). Teknologier i klasselokalet - en magtfuld fristelse. København: Unge Pædagoger, 2018(2), s. 48-57.
Bardhi, F. J., Rohm, A, & Sultan, F. (2010). Tuning in and tuning out: media multitasking among young consumers. in Journal of Consumer Behaviour / Consumer Behav. 9. 2010, pp. 316-332.
Bruns, A. (2008). Blogs, Wikipedia, Second Life and Beyond: From Production to Produsage. New York: Peter Lang.
Chou, C., Condron, L. & Belland, J. C. (2005). A Review of the Research on Internet Addiction. in Educational Psychology Review, Vol. 17, No. 4, December 2005.
Eisenstein, E. (1983). The Printing Revolution in early Modern Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge Uni. Press.
Elf, N., Hanghøj, T., Skaar, H., & Erixon, P.-O. (2015). Technology in L1: A review of empirical research projects in Scandinavia 1992-2014. Contribution to a special issue Paradoxes and Negotiations in Scandinavian L1 Research in Languages, Literatures and Literacies, edited by Ellen Krogh and Sylvi Penne. L1 - Educational Studies in Languages and Literature, 15 , 1-89.
Fahey, C. & Meaney, T. (2011). Conversation is the New Attention. In State of the Web, Business, April 19, 2011. http://www.alistapart.com/articles/conversation‐is‐the‐new‐attention/
Feng, S. F., Schwemmer, M., Gershman S. J., and Cohen, J. D. (2014). Multitasking vs. multiplexing: Toward a normative account of limitations in the simultaneous execution of control-demanding behaviors. In Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2014 March ; 14(1): 129–146.
Finkelhor, D. (2011). The Internet, Youth Safety and the Problem of “Juvenoia”. Paper from University of New Hampshire, Crimes against Children Research Center. http://www.unh.edu/ccrc/pdf/Juvenoia%20paper.pdf
Greenfield, D. N. (2000). The Net Effect: Internet Addiction and Compulsive Internet Use.http://www.virtual-addiction.com/a_neteffect.htm 20.9.2009
Greenfield, D. N.(1999). Lost in cyberspace: the web @ work. http://www.virtual-addiction.com/pdf/lostincyberspace.pdf 20.9.2009
Hougaard, A. (2018).World at Your Phone: How 'Snappers' Embody the Digital World. Rask 47. University Press of Southern Denmark, pp. 109-134.
Jenkins, H., Ford, S. and Green, J. (2013). Spreadable media – Creating value and meaning in a networked culture. New York: New York Uni. Press.
Jenkins, H. (2008). Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. New York: New York University Press.
Jenkins, H. (2006) Confronting the Challenges of Participatory Culture: Media Education for the 21st Century. London: The MIT Press.
Jørgensen, K. G. (1993). The shortest way between two points is a good idea: Signs, Peirce, and theorematic machines. In The computer as medium. Andersen, Holmqvist, & Jensen (ED). Cambridge Uni. Press.
Kardaras, N. (2016). It’s ‘digital heroin’: How screens turn kids into psychotic junkies. New York Post 27. August 2016.
Kuznekoff et al. (2015). Mobile Phones in the Classroom. in Communication Education, 64:3, 344-365.
König, C. J. (2005). Working Memory, Fluid Intelligence, and Attention Are Predictors of Multitasking Performance, but Polychronicity and Extraversion Are not. in HUMAN PERFORMANCE, 18(3), pp 243–266.
Lee ,J., Lin, L. & Robertson, T. (2012). The impact of media multitasking on Learning. in Learning, Media and Technology. Vol. 37, No. 1, March 2012, pp. 94– 104.
Mathiasen H., Aaen J., Dalsgaard C. and Thomsen M. B. (2014). Undervisningsorganisering, -former og –medier – på langs og tværs af fag og gymnasiale uddannelser. Hovedrapport 2014 4. runde, 2012-2014. Forskningsrapport 2014 Aarhus Universitet, Center for Undervisningsudvikling og Digitale Medier.
Meyrowitz, J. (1986). No Sence of Place: The Impact of Electronic Media on Social Behavior. Oxford Uni. Press. USA.
O’Brien, J. (2011). UCSF Study on Multitasking Reveals Switching Glitch in Aging Brain. www.ucsf.edu
Ong, W. J. (1982). Orality & Literacy. Reprinted 2000. New York: Routledge.
Pashler, H. (1994). Dual-task interference in simple tasks: data and theory. Psychological Bulletin, 16, 220–244.
Pietersma, H. (2000). Phenomenological epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Prehn, A. & Rashid, I. (2017). Forbyd mobiltelefoner i danske skoler - ellers ødelægger vi børnene. Kronik i Politiken 27. september 2017.
Paulsen, M. & Tække, J. (2010). Trådløse netværk og sociale normer under forandring. In Norsk Medietidsskrift, Bind 17, Nr. 1, 2010, s. 26-45.
Rekart, J. (2012). Taking on multitasking. in Kappan December 2011/January 2012. V93 N4 pp. 60 – 63.
Tække, J. and Paulsen, M. (2017). Digitalisation of education – the theory of the three waves. In Monograph Series from The Centre for Internet Research; Aarhus, Denmark 2017 (vol. 17).
Tække, J. and Paulsen, M. (2016). Undervisningsfællesskab og læringsnetværk i det digitale samfund. København: Forlaget Unge Pædagoger.
Tække, J and Paulsen, M. (2013). Sociale medier i gymnasiet - mellem forbud og ligegyldighed. København: Forlaget Unge Pædagoger.
Wood, Eileen et al. (2012). Examining the impact of off-task multi-tasking with technology on real-time classroom learning. in Computers & Education 58 (2012) pp. 365–374.
Young, K. (1999): Fanget i Nettet. København: INTROITE.
Young, K. (2006): SURFING NOT STUDYING: DEALING WITH INTERNET ADDICTION ON CAMPUS. From the Internet: http://www.netaddiction.com/articles/surfing_not_studying.pdf 20.9.2009
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Articles published in the Journal of Learning and Media are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 Unported Licens.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication; simultaneously articles are licensend under the Creative Commons Attribution license: Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerviatives (by-nc-nd). Read about this license at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/
---
At LOM.dk, you will also find articles from the discontinued Journal for the Continuing and Further Education of the Danish Universities (UNEV). Note that special rules apply to UNEV articles:
It is the authors and any other copyright holder who have the copyright of articles published under the auspices of UNEV, and access to the articles is contingent on users acknowledging and complying with the associated legal guidelines:
- Users may download and print one copy of any UNEV publication for private studies or research.
- The redistribution of articles or the use of these for revenue-funded activities or commercial purposes are not allowed.
- It is not allowed to distribute the URLs of UNEV articles.
