Generative AI and didactics: Nordic cases and implications for higher education

Editorial

Forfattere

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7146/lom.v18i31.168302

Nøgleord:

genAI, didactics, empirical cases, nordic higher education, LOM #31

Resumé

This editorial introduces the 13 articles published in Læring og Medier (LOM) #31. Generative AI in Nordic higher education: cases and pedagogical implications. The didactic triangle is applied as an analytical lens to examine how GenAI affects teaching in the cases presented in this issue and, potentially, higher education more broadly. In this context, it is worth noting that the editorial uses the concept of ”didactics” in the Nordic-German sense, referring to the careful planning of teaching and learning activities. The editorial examines and explains how GenAI affects the relationships between educators, students, and subject matter (content), that is, the three original actors in the didactic triangle. In doing so, the editorial argues that GenAI does not merely function as an educational technology that can be described through the existing relationships and actors of the didactic triangle. Rather, GenAI should be incorporated as an active fourth actor in the triangle, positioning itself between the original three. Based on the cases provided in the issue, the three original relationships in the didactic triangle are analysed in the context of GenAI-mediation, including the identification of verbs that describe the relationships among the three original actors and GenAI. The editorial concludes that the challenge ahead is not whether to use GenAI, but how educators, students, and institutions can reclaim didactic agency by shaping the conditions under which GenAI can strengthen — rather than erode or short-circuit — meaningful relationships between educators, students, and content.

Downloads

Download-data er endnu ikke tilgængelig.

Referencer

Biggs, J., Tang, C., & Kennedy, G. (2022). Teaching for quality learning at university 5th edition. McGraw-Hill Education (UK).

Bowen, J. A. & Watson, C. E. (2025). Teaching with AI : A Practical Guide to a New Era of Human Learning (Second edition). Johns Hopkins University Press.

Bruhn, T., & Marquart, F. (2025). Student experiences of ChatGPT as a feedback tool in higher education. Tidsskriftet Læring Og Medier (LOM), 18(31). https://doi.org/10.7146/lom.v17i31.144043

Bruun, M. H., Krause-Jensen, J., & Hasse, C. (2025). Skrivning, læsning, tekst og refleksiv tænkning med generativ AI på humanistiske videregående uddannelser. Tidsskriftet Læring Og Medier (LOM), 18(31). https://doi.org/10.7146/lom.v17i31.153309

Dasari, D., Hendriyanto, A., Sahara, S., Suryadi, D., Muhaimin, L. H., Chao, T., & Fitriana, L. (2024, January). ChatGPT in didactical tetrahedron, does it make an exception? A case study in mathematics teaching and learning. In Frontiers in Education, 8. Frontiers Media SA. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1295413

Fan, Y., Tang, L., Le, H., Shen, K., Tan, S., Zhao, Y., ... & Gašević, D. (2025). Beware of metacognitive laziness: Effects of generative artificial intelligence on learning motivation, processes, and performance. British Journal of Educational Technology, 56(2), 489-530. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13544

Goodchild, S., Sriraman, B. (2012). Revisiting the didactic triangle: from the particular to the general. ZDM Mathematics Education 44, 581–585. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-012-0449-3

Hansen, R., Prilop, C. N., Alsted Nielsen, T., Møller, K. L., Frøhlich Hougaard, R., & Büchert Lindberg, A. (2025). The effects of an AI feedback coach on students’ peer feedback quality, composition, and feedback experience. Tidsskriftet Læring Og Medier (LOM), 18(31). https://doi.org/10.7146/lom.v17i31.148831

Hautopp, H., Paasch Knudsen, S., Ottar Jensen, E., Højgaard Retz Jespersen, J., & Henningsen, B. (2025). At skabe, når alt er færdigt: En undersøgelse af dialogiske rum, når studerende arbejder med AI-billedgenerering i designprocesser. Tidsskriftet Læring Og Medier (LOM), 18(31). https://doi.org/10.7146/lom.v17i31.149005

Hilli, C. (2025). Postqualitative inquiries into digital study practices in higher education: Interplays of hesitations and speculations. Tidsskriftet Læring Og Medier (LOM), 18(31). https://doi.org/10.7146/lom.v18i31.148670

Hopmann, S. T. (2007). Restrained teaching: The common core of Didaktik. European Educational Research Journal, 6(2), 109–124. https://doi.org/10.2304/eerj.2007.6.2.109

Ibrahim, H., Liu, F., Asim, R., Battu, B., Benabderrahmane, S., Alhafni, B., ... & Zaki, Y. (2023). Perception, performance, and detectability of conversational artificial intelligence across 32 university courses. Scientific reports, 13(1), 12187. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-38964-3

Jensen, C. G., & Dau, S. (2025). Transparens og tillid: AI-støttet undervisnings indvirkning på de studerendes læring. Tidsskriftet Læring Og Medier (LOM), 18(31). https://doi.org/10.7146/lom.v18i31.149343

Kaup, C. F., Møller , A. K., Bundgaard , K., & Boelt , A. M. (2025). ChatGPT: Forstyrrelse eller forandring? Generativ kunstig intelligens’ rolle i kollaborativ videnskonstruktion. Tidsskriftet Læring Og Medier (LOM), 18(31). https://doi.org/10.7146/lom.v17i31.148825

Khlaif, Z. N., Alkouk, W. A., Salama, N., & Abu Eideh, B. (2025). Redesigning Assessments for AI-Enhanced Learning: A Framework for Educators in the Generative AI Era. Education Sciences, 15(2), 174. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15020174

Klafki, W. (2000). Didaktik analysis as the core of preparation of instruction. In I. Westbury, S. Hopmann, & K. Riquarts (Eds.), Teaching as a reflective practice (pp. 139–159). Lawrence Erlbaum.

Kung, T. H., Cheatham, M., Medenilla, A., Sillos, C., De Leon, L., Elepaño, C., ... & Tseng, V. (2023). Performance of ChatGPT on USMLE: potential for AI-assisted medical education using large language models. PLoS digital health, 2(2), e0000198. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000198

Lofthus, L., & Sandberg, M. H. (2025). Chatbots roller i arbeid med en fagtekst. Tidsskriftet Læring Og Medier (LOM), 18(31). https://doi.org/10.7146/lom.v17i31.150207

Møller, A. K., & Bundgaard, K. (2025). Studerendes anvendelse af generativ kunstig intelligens i programmeringsundervisning. Tidsskriftet Læring Og Medier (LOM), 18(31). https://doi.org/10.7146/lom.v18i31.148811

Mørcke, A. M., & Rump, C. Ø. (2015). University teaching and learning – models and concepts. In L. Rienecker, P. S. Jørgensen, G. Ingerslev & J. Dolin (eds.), University Teaching and Learning (pp. 93-104). Samfundslitteratur.

Necip, F., & Qvist, C. C. (2025). Journal Club Insights: Case Studies on Generative AI in Biomedical Laboratory Science Education. Tidsskriftet Læring Og Medier (LOM), 18(31). https://doi.org/10.7146/lom.v17i31.148812

Nordentoft, H. M., & Jensen, T. W. (2025). Inspiring and/or scary? Emotional tensions in student responses to formative feedback from chatbots at a master’s level course in counseling. Tidsskriftet Læring Og Medier (LOM), 18(31). https://doi.org/10.7146/lom.v18i31.149114

Pedersen, A., Hansbøl, M., & Fajkovic, M. (2025). Studerendes erfaringer med, brug af og perspektiver på Generativ AI: ved Det Humanistiske og Teologiske Fakultet, Københavns Universitet, foråret 2024. https://curis.ku.dk/ws/portalfiles/portal/525191363/AI_brug_KU_stud_01_12_2025.pdf

Qian, Y. (2025). Pedagogical applications of generative AI in higher education: A systematic review of the field. TechTrends, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-025-01100-1

Sánchez Muñoz, J. A., Flores-Eraña, G., Silva-Campos, J. M., Chavira-Quintero, R., & Olais-Govea, J. M. (2025). GenAI as a cognitive mediator: A critical-constructivist inquiry into computational thinking in pre-university education. In Frontiers in Education, 10. Frontiers Media SA. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1597249

Slot, M. F., Dissing Møller, L., Havsager, P., Østergaard, C., Winkler, S., & Minuz, E. (2026). Artificial Intelligence and Disciplinary Innovation: Developing Content and Technological Didactics in Teacher Education. Tidsskriftet Læring Og Medier (LOM), 18(31). https://doi.org/10.7146/lom.v18i31.152730

Sohail, S., Parveen, S., & Dar, T. (2025). Investigating the Role of Generative Ai in Transforming Teaching, Learning, and Assessment Practices. Journal of Applied Linguistics and TESOL (JALT), 8(4), 159-174. https://doi.org/10.63878/jalt1314

Stephenson, R., & Armstrong, C. (2026). Student generative AI survey 2026. Higher Education Policy Institute. https://www.hepi.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/HEPI-Report-199-Gen-AI-Survey-2026.pdf

Stolpe, K., & Hedrén, S. (2025). When the rules of the game change: what happens when supervisors in teacher education degree projects are joined by AI? Tidsskriftet Læring Og Medier (LOM), 18(31). https://doi.org/10.7146/lom.v18i31.148664

Uanachain, D. M. N., & Aouad, L. I. (2025). Generative AI in Education: Rethinking Learning, Assessment & Student Agency for the AI Era. Thresholds in Education, 48(1), 111-132.

Yan, L., Greiff, S., Lodge, J. M., & Gašević, D. (2025). Distinguishing performance gains from learning when using generative AI. Nature Reviews Psychology, 4(7), 435-436. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-025-00467-5

Downloads

Publiceret

02-06-2026

Citation/Eksport

Godsk, M., Christensen, I.-M. F., & Georgsen, M. (2026). Generative AI and didactics: Nordic cases and implications for higher education: Editorial. Tidsskriftet Læring Og Medier (LOM), 18(31). https://doi.org/10.7146/lom.v18i31.168302