Postqualitative inquiries into digital study practices in higher education: Interplays of hesitations and speculations.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/lom.v18i31.148670Nøgleord:
Higher education, Bildung, sociomaterialism, postqualitative design, thinking with theory, generative artificial intelligence, PowerPointResumé
Research on higher education students’ digital study practices and generative artificial intelligence (GAI) is contradictory. GAI may positively influence students’ learning by providing tailored and diverse feedback. However, if students use GAI unethically or uncritically, it may hamper their deep learning, cognitive and meta-cognitive growth, and problem-solving skills. Few studies provide practical insights into student and GAI collaboration, something this paper addresses. The study employs a postqualitative approach called thinking with theory, situating the researcher, contextual matters, and theories (Bildung, sociomaterialism) as active research participants when analysing student prompts to ChatGPT or Co-pilot in two PowerPoint presentations created by ten students during a bachelor course at Åbo Akademi University. The implications are that GAI created hesitant and speculative interplays that must be addressed to support digital study practices. Furthermore, lively interplays of humans, contextual (e.g., assessment methods) and other matters (e.g., course literature, PowerPoint) can aid in creating epistemic, ethical and aesthetically meaningful study practices in higher education.
Downloads
Referencer
Adams, C. A. (2010). Teachers Building Dwelling Thinking with Slideware. Indo-Pacific Journal of Phenomenology, 10(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.2989/IPJP.2010.10.1.3.1075
Adams, C. A., & Thompson, T. L. (2016). Researching a Posthuman World. Interviews with Digital Objects. Palgrave Macmillan.
Baidoo-Anu, D., & Owusu Ansah, L. (2023). Education in the Era of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI): Understanding the Potential Benefits of ChatGPT in Promoting Teaching and Learning. Journal of AI, 7 (1), 52-62. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4337484
Bahroun, Z., Anane, C., Ahmed, V., & Zacca, A. (2023). Transforming Education: A Comprehensive Review of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Educational Settings through Bibliometric and Content Analysis. Sustainability 15, 12983. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151712983
Barnett, R. (2024). Can we please stop talking about ‘Bildung’ - and for that matter, too, ‘the Humboldtian university’? Journal of Praxis in Higher Education, 6 (3), 45-66.
Bohlin, H. (2008). "Bildung" and Moral Self-Cultivation in Higher Education: What Does It Mean and How Can It Be Achieved? Forum on Public Policy Online.
Bond, M., Khosravi, H., De Laat, M., Bergdahl, N., Negrea, V., Oxley, E., Pham, P., Chong, S. W., & Siemens, G. (2024). A meta systematic review of artificial intelligence in higher ed-ucation: a call for increased ethics, collaboration, and rigour. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education 21, 4: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00436-z
Chan, C. K. Y. (2023). A comprehensive AI policy education framework for university teaching and learning. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education 20 (1): 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00408-3
Darvishi, A., H. Khosravi, S. Sadiq, D. Gašević, & G. Siemens. 2024. Impact of AI Assistance on Student Agency. Computers & Education 210: 104967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104967
Farrelly, T., & Baker, N. (2023). Generative Artificial Intelligence: Implications and Considerations for Higher Education Practice. Education Sciences, 13, 1109. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13111109
Fawns, T. (2022). An Entangled Pedagogy: Looking Beyond the Pedagogy—Technology Dichotomy. Postdigital Science and Education, 4, 711–728. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-022-00302-7
Fenwick, T., Edwards, R., & Sawchuck, P. (2011). Emerging Approaches to Educational Research: Tracing the Socio-Material. Taylor & Francis.
Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. (2019). The ethical principles of research with human participants and ethical review in the human sciences in Finland. Tenk Publica-tions. https://www.tenk.fi/en
Gourley, L. (2021). Posthumanism and The Digital University. Bloomsbury.
Hasse, C., & Bruun, M. H. (2023). ChatGPT minder os om det gode ved uvidenhed. Videnskab.dk. Read 19.06.2024: https://videnskab.dk/teknologi/ChatGPT-minder-os-om-det-gode-ved-uvidenhed/
Horlacher, R. (2016). The Educated Subject and the German Concept of Bildung. A Compara-tive Cultural History. Routledge.
Humboldt, W. von. (2010). Theory of Bildung. G. Horton-Krüger (Transl.). In I. Westbury, S. Hopmann & K. Riquarts (Eds.) Teaching as a Reflective Practice. The German Didaktik Tradition (pp. 57-61). Routledge.
Jackson, A. Y., & Mazzei, L. (2023). Thinking with Theory in Qualitative Research. Routledge.
Javaid, M., Haleem, A., Singh, R.P., Khan, S., & Khan, I.H. (2023). Unlocking opportunities through the ChatGPT Tool towards ameliorating the education system. BenchCouncil transactions on Benchmarks. Standards & Evaluations 3 (2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbench.2023.100115
Johnston, H., Wells, R.F., Shanks, E.M., Boey, T., & Parsons, B. N. (2024). Student perspectives on the use of generative artificial intelligence technologies in higher education. International Journal for Educational Integrity 20 (2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-024-00149-4
Kroksmark, T. (2011). Den tidlösa pedagogiken. Studentlitteratur.
Lüth, C. (2010). On Wilhelm von Humboldt’s Theory of Bildung. G. Horton-Krüger (Transl.). In I. Westbury, S. Hopmann & K. Riquarts (Eds.) Teaching as a Reflective Practice. The German Didaktik Tradition (pp. 63-84). Routledge.
Milano, S., McGrane, J.A., & Leonelli, S. (2023) Large language models challenge the future of higher education. Nature Machine Intelligence 5, 333–334. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-023-00644-2
Nguyen, A., Hong, Y., Dang, B., & Huang, X. (2024). Human-AI collaboration patterns in AI-assisted academic writing. Studies in Higher Education, 49(5), 847–864. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2024.2323593
Ou, A. W., Stöhr, C., & Malmström, H. (2024). Academic communication with AI-powered language tools in higher education: From a post-humanist perspective. System 121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103225
Pastuhov, A. (2017). The Ideals and Practices of Citizenship in Nordic Study Circles. In M. Milana, S. Webb, J. Holford, R. Waller & P. Jarvis, The Palgrave International Handbook on Adult and Lifelong Education and Learning (pp. 797-815). Palgrave Macmillan.
Sjöström, J., & Eilks, I. (2021). The Bildung theory – from von Humboldt to Klafki and Beyond. In B. Akpan and T. Kennedy (eds.), Science Education in Theory and Practice (pp. 55-67), Springer Texts in Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43620-9_5
Springgay, S., & Truman, S. E. (2018). On the Need for Methods Beyond Proceduralism: Speculative Middles, (In) Tensions, and Response-Ability in Research. Qualitative Inquiry, 24 (3), 203-214. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800417704464
Tassoti, S. (2024). Assessement of Students Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence: Prompting Strategies and Prompt Engineering in Chemistry Education. Journal of Chemistry Education, 101 (6), 2475-2482. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c00212
Taylor, C. (2017). Is a posthumanist Bildung possible? Reclaiming the promise of Bildung for contemporary higher education. Higher Education, 74, 419-435. 10.1007/s10734-016-9994-y
Wiberg, M. (2016). Dannelsesbegrebets rolle som regulativ ide i teoretisk pædagogik – Dan-nelsesbegrebet og den pædagogiske forskning. Studier i Pædagogisk Filosofi 1, 81–95. https://tidsskrift.dk/spf/article/view/23242/21749
Yang, Y., Luo, J., Yang, M., Yang, R., & Chen, J. (2024). From surface to deep learning approaches with Generative AI in higher education: an analytical framework of student agency. Studies in Higher Education, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2024.2327003
Öberg, L. (2011). Det bildande seminariet. In A. Burman (Ed.) Våga veta! Om bildningens möjligheter i massutbildningens tidevarv (pp. 51-73). Södertörns högskola.
Downloads
Publiceret
Citation/Eksport
Nummer
Sektion
Licens
Copyright (c) 2025 Charlotta Hilli
Dette værk er under følgende licens Creative Commons Navngivelse – Ikke-kommerciel – Ingen Bearbejdede Værker (by-nc-nd).
Artikler publiceret i Tidsskriftet for Læring og Medier er licenseret under en Creative Commons Navngivelse-IkkeKommerciel-IngenBearbejdelse 4.0 Unported Licens.
Forfattere bevarer deres ophavsret og giver tidsskriftet ret til første publicering, samtidigt med at værket er omfattet af Creative Commons Attribution-licensen: Navngivelse – Ikke-kommerciel - Ingen Bearbejdede Værker (by-nc-nd). Læs om licensen på http://www.creativecommons.dk/om/.
---
På LOM.dk kan du endvidere finde artikler fra det nu nedlagte Tidsskrift for Universiteternes Efter- og Videreuddannelse (UNEV). Vær opmærksom på, at der gælder særlige regler for UNEV artikler:
Det er forfatterne og evt. andre ophavsret indehavere, der har ophavsretten til artikler udgivet i UNEV regi, og det er en betingelse for adgang til artiklerne, at brugere anerkender og overholder de juridiske retningslinjer forbundet hermed.
- Brugere må downloade og printe én kopi af en hvilken som helst UNEV artikel mhp. private studier eller forskning.
- Det er ikke tilladt at videredistribuere artikler eller anvende disse til indtægtsdækkede aktiviteter eller kommercielle formål.
- Det er tilladt at distribuere URL’en til UNEV artikler.
