Studerendes digitale læringsmiljøer: læringsplatform eller medieøkologi?

  • Francesco Caviglia
  • Christian Dalsgaard Centre for Teaching Development and Digital Media, Aarhus University
  • Jacob Davidsen
  • Thomas Ryberg
Nøgleord: LMS, online uddannelse, personlige læringsmiljøer, digitale medier

Resumé

Formålet med artiklen er at undersøge, hvad universitetsstuderendes digitale læringsmiljøer består af med henblik på at forstå samspillet mellem institutionelle systemer og de værktøjer, som studerende selv varetager. Udgangspunktet for artiklen er en undersøgelse af 128 humaniora studerendes digitale læringsmiljøer. Formålene med undersøgelsen er 1) at give et overblik over, hvilke værktøjer studerende anvender til deres studieaktiviteter, 2) at finde frem til de mest anvendte og vigtigste værktøjer for studerende, og 3) at afdække, hvilke aktiviteter værktøjerne anvendes til. Undersøgelsen viser først og fremmest en udpræget variation i studerendes mediebrug. Nogle af de mest anvendte værktøjer i studerendes digitale læringsmiljøer er Facebook, Google Drev, notetagningsværktøjer og institutionelle systemer. Derudover viser undersøgelsen, at værktøjerne opfylder nogle meget grundlæggende behov hos de studerende såsom samarbejde, kommunikation og feedback. Endelig viser undersøgelsen, at de fleste vigtige værktøjer er uafhængige af de systemer, der stilles til rådighed af uddannelsesinstitutionerne. På baggrund af undersøgelsen diskuteres, hvordan institutionelle systemer spiller sammen med øvrige værktøjer i de studerendes læringsmiljøer, og hvordan man kan kvalificere studerendes digitale læringsmiljøer i forhold til eksisterende og fremspirende behov.

Referencer

Aaen, J. & Dalsgaard, C. (2016). Student Facebook groups as a third space: between social life and schoolwork, Learning, Media and Technology, 41:1, 160-186, DOI: 10.1080/17439884.2015.1111241

Attwell, G. (2006). Social Software, Personal Learning Environments and Lifelong Competence Development. http://www.knownet.com/writing/weblogs/Graham_Attwell/entries/6665854266/LLLandple.rtf/attach/LLLandple.rtf (14.12.2010).

Barron, B. J. S., Schwartz, D. L., Vye, N. J., Moore, A., Petrosino, A., Zech, L., & Bransford, J. D. (1998). Doing With Understanding: Lessons From Research on Problem- and Project-Based Learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7, 271–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.1998.9672056

Braun, V, & Clarke, V. (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology, Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3:2, pp. 77-101.

Clark, W., Logan, K., Luckin, R., Mee, A., & Oliver, M. (2009). Beyond Web 2.0: mapping the technology landscapes of young learners. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25(1), 56–69. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2008.00305.x

Cuesta, M., M. Eklund, I. Rydin, and A. K. Witt. 2015. “Using Facebook as a Co-learning Community in Higher Education.” Learning, Media and Technology, 1–18. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/17439884.2015.1064952

Davidsen, J., & Ryberg, T. (2016). Samhørighed, interaktion og vidensdeling blandt studerende - Erfaringer fra et ikt-pædagogisk udviklingsprojekt. Dansk Universitetspædagogisk Tidsskrift, 21, 57–71.

Friesen, N., & Lowe, S. (2012). The questionable promise of social media for education: connective learning and the commercial imperative. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28(3), 183–194. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00426.x

Gislev, T., Larsen, A.H., & Caviglia, F. (2017). Studerende som medskabere af medieøkologier, abstract til DUN Conference 2017, http://dun-net.dk/media/304908/pa-studerende-som-medskabere-af-medieoekologier.pdf

Guest, G., MacQueen, K. M., & Namey, E. E. (2011). Applied thematic analysis. Sage.

Heilesen, S., & Davidsen, S. (2016). Projektarbejde og akademisk IT-skoling. Tidsskriftet Læring og Medier (LOM), 9(15). Retrieved from http://ojs.statsbiblioteket.dk/index.php/lom/article/view/23106

Henderson, M., Selwyn, N., & Aston, R. (2015). What works and why? Student perceptions of “useful” digital technology in university teaching and learning. Studies in Higher Education, 0(0), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1007946

Henderson, M., Selwyn, N., Finger, G., & Aston, R. (2015). Students’ everyday engagement with digital technology in university: exploring patterns of use and “usefulness.” Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 37(3), 308–319. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2015.1034424

Hillesund, T. (2010). Digital reading spaces: How expert readers handle books, the Web and electronic paper. First Monday, 15(4). http://dx.doi.org/10.5210/fm.v15i4.2762

Ito, M. et. al. (2010). Hanging out, messing around, and geeking out: kids living and learning with new media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Khalid, M. S., Rongbutsri, N., & Buus, L. (2012). Facilitating Adoption of Web Tools for Problem and Project Based Learning Activities. In V. Hodgson, C. Jones, M. de Laat, D. McConnell, T. Ryberg, & P. Sloep (Eds.), Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Networked Learning 2012 (pp. 559–566). Retrieved from http://www.networkedlearningconference.org.uk/abstracts/pdf/khalid.pdf

Kirschner, P. A. (2015). Facebook as learning platform: Argumentation superhighway or dead-end street? Computers in Human Behavior, 53, 621–625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.011

Martindale, T., & Dowdy, M. (2010). Personal Learning Environments, I:Veletsianos, G. Emerging Technologies in Distance Education, AU Press,Athabasca University.

McEwan, B. 2011. “‘Hybrid Engagement: How Facebook Helps and Hinders Students’ Social Integration’.” In Higher Education Administration with Social Media: Including Applications in Student Affairs, Enrollment Management, Alumni Relations, and Career Centers, edited by L. A. Wankel and C. Wankel, vol. 2, 3–23. Bingley, UK: GBR Emerald Group.

Pascale, R. T., Sternin, J., & Sternin, M. (2010). The power of positive deviance: How unlikely innovators solve the world’s toughest problems. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.

Rongbutsri, N., Khalid, M. S., & Ryberg, T. (2011). ICT support for students’ collaboration in problem and project based learning. In J. Davies, E. de Graaf, & A. Kolmos (Eds.), PBL Across The Disciplines (pp. 351–363). Aalborg Universitetsforlag. Retrieved from http://vbn.aau.dk/files/57931848/PBL_across_the_disciplines_research_into_the_best_practice.pdf

Ryberg, T., Davidsen, J., & Hodgson, V. (2017 in press). Understanding Nomadic Collaborative Learning Groups. British Journal of Educational Technology. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12584

Sclater, N. (2008). Web 2.0, Personal Learning Environments, and the Future of Learning Management Systems, Educause,Vol. 2008 (13).

Sørensen, M. T. (2017 in press). The students’ choice of technology – a pragmatic and outcome-focused approach. In D. Kergel, B. Heidkamp, P. Kjærsdam Telléus, R. Tadeusz, & S. Nowakowski (Eds.), The Digital Turn in Higher Education. Springer.

Thomsen, D. L., Sørensen, M. T., & Ryberg, T. (2016). Where have all the students gone? They are all on Facebook Now. In S. Cranmer, M. de Laat, T. Ryberg, & J.-A. Sime (Eds.), Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Networked Learning 2016 (pp. 94–102). Lancaster University. Retrieved from http://www.lancaster.ac.uk/fss/organisations/netlc/abstracts/pdf/P01.pdf

Wilson, S., Liber, O., Johnson, M., Beauvoir, P., Sharples, P. & Milligan, C. (2006). Personal Learning Environments: Challenging the dominant design of educational systems, ECTEL 2006 Proceedings. http://dspace.learningnetworks.org/handle/1820/727

Publiceret
2018-01-16
Citation/Eksport
Caviglia, F., Dalsgaard, C., Davidsen, J., & Ryberg, T. (2018). Studerendes digitale læringsmiljøer: læringsplatform eller medieøkologi?. Tidsskriftet Læring Og Medier (LOM), 10(18). https://doi.org/10.7146/lom.v10i18.96928