MOOC design – Dissemination to the masses or facilitation of social learning and a deep approach to learning?

  • Inger-Marie Falgren Christensen SDU Universitetspædagogik, Syddansk Universitet
  • Mette Dam Laursen Studenterunderviser Syddansk Universitet
  • Jacob Bøggild H. C. Andersen Centret Syddansk Universitet
  • Torsten Bøgh Thomsen H. C. Andersen Centret Syddansk Universitet

Resumé

This article accounts for the design of the massive open online course (MOOC) Hans Christian Andersen’s Fairy tales on FutureLearn and reports on the effectiveness of this design in terms of engaging learners in social learning and encouraging a deep approach to learning. A learning pathway was designed that provided learners with relevant knowledge, allowed them to practice their analysis skills and provided model responses. In the first run of the MOOC, a light facilitation approach was used to motivate and engage learners. In the second run, this was supplemented with live Q & A sessions and increased educator feedback. Course data show that that some learners use the space provided for social interaction and mutual support. A learning pathway that engages learners in discussion and progression from week to week facilitates a deep approach to learning. However, this requires more support from the educators and the course host.

Referencer

Anderson, A.; Huttenlocher, D.; Kleinberg, J. & Leskovec, J. (2014). Engaging with Massive Online Courses. Presented at the International World Wide Web Conference, April 7-11, Seoul, Korea. Retrieved on 2/6 2016 from http://cs.stanford.edu/people/ashton/pubs/mooc-engagement-www2014.pdf

Christensen, O. (2016). MOOSL – Democratizing Education with Social Learning MOOCs. IN: Ubachs, G. and Konings, L. (Eds.) (2016). Conference Proceedings. The Online, Open and Flexible Higher Education Conference. 2016. EADTU. Pp. 632-642.

Czerniewicz, L.; Deacon, A.; Small, J. & Walji, S. (2014). Developing world MOOCs: A curriculum view of the MOOC landscape. IN: Special Issue on MOOCs. Journal of Global Literacies, Technologies and Emerging Pedagogies, Volume 2, Issue 3, July 2014, pp. 122-139.

Daniel, J. (2012). Making Sense of MOOCs: Musings in a Maze of Myth, Paradox and Possibility. IN: Journal of Interactive Media in Education. Retrieved on 31/3 2013 from http://jime.open.ac.uk/articles/10.5334/2012-18/.

Eisenberg, M. & Fischer, G. (2014) "MOOCs: A Perspective from the Learning Sciences" in J. L. Polman et al. (Eds.), Learning and Becoming in Practice: 11th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS) 2014, Boulder, pp. 190-197. Retrieved on 2/6 2016 from http://l3d.cs.colorado.edu/~gerhard/papers/2014/ICLS-MOOCS.pdf.

Ferguson, R. & Sharples, M. (2014). Innovative Pedagogy at Massive Scale. IN Rensing et al. (Eds.) (2014). Open Learning and Teaching in Educational Communities. 9th European conference on Technology Enhanced Learning, EC-TEL 2014. Proceedings. Springer, pp. 98-111.

Ferguson, R., & Clow, D. (2015). Examining engagement: analysing learner subpopulations in massive open online courses (MOOCs) (pp. 51–58). ACM Press.

Ferguson, R., Clow, D., Beale, R., Cooper, A. J., Morris, N., Bayne, S., & Woodgate, A. (2015). Moving Through MOOCS: Pedagogy, Learning Design and Patterns of Engagement. In G. Conole, T. Klobučar, C. Rensing, J. Konert, & É. Lavoué (Eds.), Design for Teaching and Learning in a Networked World (Vol. 9307, pp. 70–84). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

Fischer, G. (2015): “Massively Open Online Courses (MOOCs) as Components of Rich Landscapes of Learning“, Proceedings of Academia Europaea & The Wenner-Gren Foundations Conference: “Emerging Models of Learning and Teaching in Higher Education: From Books to MOOCs?”, Stockholm, May 2015 (in print). Retrieved on 11 July 2016 from:
http://l3d.cs.colorado.edu/~gerhard/papers/2015/TAcademia-Europea-MOOC.pdf

Frederiksen, M. (2013). Integration I ‘mixed methods’ forskning: Metode eller design. IN Metode & Forskningsdesign. Nr. 1, 2013, p. 17-40.

FutureLearn (undated). About section on www.futurelearn.com. Retrieved on 15/8 2016 from https://www.futurelearn.com/about.

Haggard, S. (2016). The Maturing of the MOOC: Literature Review of Massive Open Online Courses and Other Forms of Online and Distance Learning (2016). BIS Research Paper Number 130. Department for Business Innovation and Skills, UK. Retrieved on 2/6 2016 from: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/240193/13-1173-maturing-of-the-mooc.pdf

Hébert, L. (2006), « The Actantial Model », in Louis Hébert (dir.), Signo [online], Rimouski (Quebec), http://www.signosemio.com/greimas/actantial-model.asp.

Heilesen, S. (2014). Når talen er om MOOC – Nedslag i diskussionen af en ny teknologi. LUG-Projektet, delprojekt A 2014. DUN-konferencen, 5. Maj, 2014.

Jih, H. J. (1996). The impact of learners’ pathways on learning performance in multimedia Computer Aided Learning. Journal of Network and Computer Applications. 19 (4), pp. 367-380.

Kop, R. (2011). The Challenges to Connectivist Learning on Open Online Networks: Learning Experiences during a Massive Open Online Course. In. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning. Vol. 12.3. March 2011, pp. 19-38.

Laurillard, D. (2012). Teaching as a Design Science – Building Pedagogical Patterns for Learning and Technology. New York: Routledge.

Marton F. & Säljö R. (1976). On qualitative differences in learning. I – Outcome and Process. British Journal of Educational Psychology. Volume 46, Issue 1, February 1976, pp. 4-11.

McAuley, A.; Stewart, B.; Siemens, G. & Cormier, D. (2010). The MOOC model for digital practice. Massive Open Online Courses. Digital ways of knowing and learning. Retrieved on 10/4 2013 from: http://elearnspace.org/Articles/MOOC_Final.pdf

Pappano, L. (2012). The Year of the MOOC. New York Times. Novemeber 2, 2012. Retrieved on 15/8 2016 from http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/04/education/edlife/massive-open-online-courses-are-multiplying-at-a-rapid-pace.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0 .

Propp, V. (1928). Exerpts from Morphology of the Folk Tale. Translation 1968. The American Folklore Society and Indiana University. Available at: http://homes.di.unimi.it/~alberti/Mm10/doc/propp.pdf

Rai, L. & Chunrao, D. (2016). Influencing Factors of Success and Failure in MOOC and General Anaysis of Learner Behavior. In: International Journal of Information and Education Technology, Vol. 6, No. 4, April 2016.

Raposo-Rivas, M., Martínez-Figueira, E., & Sarmiento-Campos, J.-A. (2015). A Study on the Pedagogical Components of Massive Online Courses. Comunicar, 22(44), 27–35.

Sharples, M., Adams, A., Ferguson, R. Gaved, M., McAndrew, P., Rientes, B., Weller, M. & Whitelock, D. (2014). Innvoating Pedagogy 2014. Open University Innovation Report 3. Milton Keynes: The Open University.

University of Edinburgh (2013). MOOCs @ Edinburgh 2013 – Report #1.

Walton, M. (2014). Social learning. Blog post from the FutureLearn Partners forum. 18 December 2014.

Yuan, L. & Powell, S. (2013). MOOCs and Open Education: Implications for Higher Education. A white paper. Jisc Cetis. Retrieved on 9/5 2013 from http://publications.cetis.org.uk/2013/667.

Yousef, A. M. F., Chatti, M. A., Schroeder, U., Wosnitza, M. & Jakobs, H. (2014). IN: Zvacek, S et al. (Eds.) (2014). Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Computer Supported Education. Barcelona, pp. 9-20.

Publiceret
2016-11-04
Citation/Eksport
Christensen, I.-M., Laursen, M., Bøggild, J., & Thomsen, T. (2016). MOOC design – Dissemination to the masses or facilitation of social learning and a deep approach to learning?. Tidsskriftet Læring Og Medier (LOM), 9(16). https://doi.org/10.7146/lom.v9i16.24279