Engagerende didaktiske design i blendede læringsrum – et grundlag for facilitering af læreprocesser
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/lom.v9i16.24190Nøgleord:
Blended Learning, learning designResumé
Abstrakt Med udgangspunkt i to cases, fra henholdsvis et forløb fra en professionsuddannelse og et forløb fra en masteruddannelse i ikt og læring, begge designet som Blended Learning, adresserer vi den retoriske problematik, der ligger i begrebet BL. Vi skelner mellem didaktik og læring, hvor didaktik forstås som undervisningstilrettelæggelse, gennemførelse og evaluering, og læring forstås som en proces, der involverer en mental og/eller kropslig ændring afhængig af samspillet med det omgivende fysiske og sociale læringsrum. Dermed lægges op til en læringsøkologisk tænkning, hvor entiteter i de virtuelle og fysiske miljøer motiverer til forskellige aktiviteter. Forskningsspørgsmålet som stilles er: Hvilke didaktiske design i de blendede læringsmiljøer motiverer studerendes engagement, og hvad betyder fællesskabet i fysiske og virtuelle miljøer for dette engagement? De to cases afslører, hvorledes didaktisk design nødvendigvis må facilitere etableringen af forpligtende fællesskaber, gennem de studerendes engagement. Abstract Based on two case studies of Blended Learning (BL) courses in higher education; a university college education and a master's programme at a university, we will discuss the concept of Blended Learning. We distinguish between the teachers learning design and the students learning processes, where the teacher learning design includes planning, implementation and assessment, and learning includes a mental and/or an embodied change or development. We introduce a learning ecological thinking where entities in the virtual and physical environments motivate different activities. The research question addressed is; which learning design of Blended Learning encourages student involvement in the learning process, and what influence does the community in physical and online environments have for the commitment among the participants? The two cases reveal how educational design must necessarily facilitate the establishment of binding communities through the students’ engagement.Downloads
Referencer
Andreasen, L. B., & Nielsen, J. L. (2013). Educational designs supporting student engagement through networked project studies. Increasing Student Engagement and Retention Using Mobile Applications: Smartphones, Skype and Texting Technologies, 19–46.
Bleiker, J., Knapp, K. M., & Frampton, I. (2011). Teaching patient care to students: a blended learning approach in radiography education. Radiography, 17(3), 235–240.
Borgmann, A. (2010). Reality and technology. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 34(1), 27–35.
Chew, E., Jones, N., & Turner, D. (2008). Critical review of the blended learning models based on Maslow’s and Vygotsky’s educational theory. In International Conference on Hybrid Learning and Education (pp. 40–53). Springer.
Christensen, B. (2014). FlexVid og praksistilknytningen. In C. H. Jensen & H. J. Staugaard (Eds), FlexVidere (pp.37-47). Book on Demand Aalborg: UCN Forskning og Udvikling
Dalziel, J. (2003). Implementing learning design: The learning activity management system (LAMS). In G.Crisp, D.Thiele, I.Scholten, S.Barker and J.Baron (Eds), Interact, Integrate, Impact: Proceedings of the 20th Annual Conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education. Adelaide, 7-10 December 2003.
Dalziel, J. (2013). Implementing learning design: A decade of lessons learned. Electric Dreams. Proceedings Ascilite, 210–220.
Dalziel, J., Conole, G., Wills, S., Walker, S., Bennett, S., Dobozy, E., … Bower, M. (2016). The Larnaca declaration on learning design. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2016(1).
Dau, S. (2015). Studerendes orientering i fleksible professionsuddannelsers læringsrum: Et narrativt casestudie af vidensudviklingens veje og afveje. Videnbasen for Aalborg UniversitetVBN, Aalborg UniversitetAalborg University, Det Humanistiske FakultetThe Faculty of Humanities, E-learning labE-learning lab.
Dillenbourg, P., Järvelä, S., & Fischer, F. (2009). The evolution of research on computer-supported collaborative learning. In Technology-enhanced learning (pp. 3–19). Springer.
Dirckinck-Holmfeld, L., Jones, C., & Lindström, B. (2009). Analysing networked learning practices in higher education and continuing professional development. Sense Publishers.
Egekvist, C. T., Nyrup, C. H., Sloth, H. Thomsen, H., Debess, J. E., Vejle-Sørensen, J. C.,… Hansen, S. H. (2012). Model for de sundhedsfaglige uddannelser med udgangspunkt i radiografuddannelsen. In C. H. Jensen & H. J. Staugaard (Eds), FlexVid: Fleksible arbejdsformer i videregående uddannelser (pp. 101-126). Book on Demand Aalborg: UCN Forskning og Udvikling
Florer, T. (2013). A study of student engagement and the factors that contribute to students’ use of blended learning technologies.
Garrison, D. R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 7(2), 95–105.
Garrison, D. R., & Vaughan, N. D. (2008). Blended learning in higher education: Framework, principles, and guidelines. John Wiley & Sons.
Glud, L. N., Buus, L., Ryberg, T., Georgsen, M., & Davidsen, J. (2010). Contributing to a learning methodology for web 2.0 learning–Identifying central tensions in educational use of web 2.0 technologies. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Networked Learning (Vol. 2010, pp. 934–94).
Graham, C. R. (2006). Blended learning systems. The Handbook of Blended Learning, 3–21.
Gynther, K. (2014). Uddannelsesteknologi og didaktisk design for det 21. århundrede.
Harasim, L. (2012). Learning theory and online technologies. Routledge.
Henderson, M. J. (2007). Investigating the role of community in sustaining teacher participation in blended professional development. James Cook University.
Hiim, H., & Hippe, E. (2007). Læring gennem oplevelse, forståelse og handling: en studiebog i didaktik (Vol. 2. udgave). [Kbh.]: Gyldendal.
Illeris, K. (2011). Kompetence. Samfundslitteratur.
John-Matthews, J. S., Gibbs, V., & Messer, S. (2013). Extending the role of technology enhanced learning within an undergraduate radiography programme. Radiography, 19(1), 67–72.
Jokinen, P., & Mikkonen, I. (2013). Teachers’ experiences of teaching in a blended learning environment. Nurse Education in Practice, 13(6), 524–528.
Kemp, L. J. (2013). Introducing blended learning: An experience of uncertainty for students in the United Arab Emirates. Research in Learning Technology, 21.
Kolmos, A., Fink, F. K., & Krogh, L. (2004). The Aalborg PBL model. Aalborg University Press Aalborg.
Launsø, L., Rieper, O., & Olsen, L. (2011). Forskning om og med mennesker: forskningstyper og forskningsmetoder i samfundsforskning. København: Nyt Nordisk Forlag.
Laurillard, D. (2008). Technology enhanced learning as a tool for pedagogical innovation. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 42(3‐4), 521–533.
Laurillard, D. (2013). Teaching as a design science: Building pedagogical patterns for learning and technology. Routledge.
Masika, R., & Jones, J. (2016). Building student belonging and engagement: insights into higher education students’ experiences of participating and learning together. Teaching in Higher Education, 21(2), 138–150.
Master i IKT og Læring. (2016). Retrieved 19 August 2016, from http://www.aau.dk/uddannelser/efteruddannelse/master/ikt-laering
Matzat, U. (2013). Do blended virtual learning communities enhance teachers’ professional development more than purely virtual ones? A large scale empirical comparison. Computers & Education, 60(1), 40–51.
Motteram, G. (2006). ‘Blended’education and the transformation of teachers: a long‐term case study in postgraduate UK Higher Education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 37(1), 17–30.
OECD. (2016). AN OECD HORIZON SCAN OF MEGATRENDS AND TECHNOLOGY TRENDS IN THE CONTEXT OF FUTURE RESEARCH POLICY. København: Danish Agency for Science, Technology and Innovation. Retrieved from http://ufm.dk/en/publications/2016/files/an-oecd-horizon-scan-of-megatrends-and-technology-trends-in-the-context-of-future-research-policy.pdf
Oliver, M., & Trigwell, K. (2005). Can ‘blended learning’be redeemed? E-Learning and Digital Media, 2(1), 17–26.
Piki, A. (2011). Learner Engagement in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Environments: A mixed-methods study in postgraduate education. University of London.
Rennie, F., & Morrison, T. (2013). E-learning and social networking handbook: Resources for higher education. Routledge.
Rogers, Y., Sharp, H., & Preece, J. (2011). Interaction design. Wiley, Chichester.
Ryberg, T., & Dau, S. (2013). Sociale medier i klinisk praksis. In Læring i og af klinisk praksis. Nyt Nordisk Forlag Arnold Busck.
Santandreu Calonge, D., Chiu, P., Thadani, D. R., Mark, K. P., & Pun, C. F. (2011). In-service development for graduate teaching assistants: A blended-learning and formative approach. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 8(3), 3.
Sharpe, R., & Beetham, H. (2010). Understanding students’ uses of technology for learning: towards creative appropriation. Rethinking Learning for the Digital Age: How Learners Shape Their Experiences, 85–99.
Smyth, S., Houghton, C., Cooney, A., & Casey, D. (2012). Students’ experiences of blended learning across a range of postgraduate programmes. Nurse Education Today, 32(4), 464–468.
Sorensen, E. K. (2009). Undervisning og læring på tværs af fysiske og medierede rum: Et case studie på universitetsniveau. In Vidensmedier.
Sorensen, E. K., & Murchú, D. Ó. (2006). Enhancing Learning Through Technology. IGI GLOBAL
Staugaard, H.J. (2012). Blended Learning – et spørgsmål om økologi. In C. H. Jensen & H. J. Staugaard (Eds), FlexVid: Fleksible arbejdsformer i videregående uddannelser (pp. 22-38). Book on Demand Aalborg: UCN Forskning og Udvikling
Tørnæs, U. (2016). Behov for bedre match mellem uddannelse og job — Uddannelses- og Forskningsministeriet. Retrieved 18 August 2016, from http://ufm.dk/minister-og-ministerium/ministeren/taler/2016/behov-for-bedre-match-mellem-uddannelse-og-job?searchterm=fleksible%250A%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20uddannelser
Wozniak, H., Mahony, M. J., Lever, T., & Pizzica, J. (2009). Stepping through the orientation looking glass: A staged approach for postgraduate students. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25(2), 221–234.
Zemsky, R., & Massey, W. F. (2005). Stalled: E-learning as thwarted innovation. Global Perspectives on E-Learning: Rhetoric and Reality, 241–255.
Downloads
Publiceret
Citation/Eksport
Nummer
Sektion
Licens
Artikler publiceret i Tidsskriftet for Læring og Medier er licenseret under en Creative Commons Navngivelse-IkkeKommerciel-IngenBearbejdelse 4.0 Unported Licens.
Forfattere bevarer deres ophavsret og giver tidsskriftet ret til første publicering, samtidigt med at værket er omfattet af Creative Commons Attribution-licensen: Navngivelse – Ikke-kommerciel - Ingen Bearbejdede Værker (by-nc-nd). Læs om licensen på http://www.creativecommons.dk/om/.
---
På LOM.dk kan du endvidere finde artikler fra det nu nedlagte Tidsskrift for Universiteternes Efter- og Videreuddannelse (UNEV). Vær opmærksom på, at der gælder særlige regler for UNEV artikler:
Det er forfatterne og evt. andre ophavsret indehavere, der har ophavsretten til artikler udgivet i UNEV regi, og det er en betingelse for adgang til artiklerne, at brugere anerkender og overholder de juridiske retningslinjer forbundet hermed.
- Brugere må downloade og printe én kopi af en hvilken som helst UNEV artikel mhp. private studier eller forskning.
- Det er ikke tilladt at videredistribuere artikler eller anvende disse til indtægtsdækkede aktiviteter eller kommercielle formål.
- Det er tilladt at distribuere URL’en til UNEV artikler.
