Computing with concepts using tangible, computational tools
a 21st century competency for teachers and students in the humanities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/lom.v15i27.134149Nøgleord:
computational thinking, computational tools, videregående uddannelse, humaniora, 21st century competencesResumé
The computational thinking (CT) method, Computing with concepts using tangible, computational tools, developed for humanistic subjects in higher education, is conceptualised as a 21st century competency in this theoretical article. The method aligns with the categories: Ways of thinking, Ways of working and Tools for working since it helps students build competencies in relation to generating ideas in novel and unconventional ways, in solving problems creatively and rigorously, and in representing and communicating ideas and solutions effectively and computationally. The method helps students engage in constructive dialogue, collaboratively explore abstract concepts and reflect on preferred ways of learning and personal biases, i.e. learn to learn. How CT activities map onto 21st century competencies is influenced by the learning theoretical framing, choice of technology and approach and the function of CT in the activity. The conclusion is that the CT method developed has potential not only as a relevant way for teachers and students in the humanities to work with CT and computational tools but also with respects to supporting students in building 21st century competencies.
Downloads
Referencer
Abrahamson, D., & Bakker, A. (2016). Making sense of movement in embodied design for mathematics learning. Cognitive research: principles and implications, 1(1), 33. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-016-0034-3
Binkley, M., Erstad, O., Herman, J., Raizen, S., Ripley, M., Miller-Ricci, M., & Rumble, M. (2012). Defining Twenty-First Century Skills. In P. Griffin, B. McGaw, & E. Care (Eds.), Assessment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills (pp. 17-66). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2324-5_2
Bocconi, S., Chioccariello, A., Dettori, G., Ferrari, A., Engelhardt, K., Kampylis, P., & Punie, Y. (2016). Exploring the field of computational thinking as a 21st century skill. Proceedings of the EDULEARN16, 16, 4725-4733.
Bonet, E. (2011). Comments on the Logic and Rhetoric of Ramon Llull. In A. Fidora & C. Sierra (Eds.), Ramon Llull, from the Ars Magna to Artificial Intelligence. Artificial Intelligence Research Institute Barcelona.
Bonner, A. (2011). What Was Lluil Up To? In A. Fidora & C. Sierra (Eds.), Ramon Llull, from the Ars Magna to Artificial Intelligence. Artificial Intelligence Research Institute Barcelona.
Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32-42. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X018001032
Caeli, E. N., & Yadav, A. (2020). Unplugged Approaches to Computational Thinking: a Historical Perspective. TechTrends, 64(1), 29-36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-019-00410-5
Chongtay, R. (2018). Computational Literacy skill set–an incremental approach. In N. B. Dohn (Ed.), Designing for learning in a networked world (pp. 158-174). Routledge.
Christensen, I.-M. F. (2023). Integrating computational thinking in humanistic subjects in higher education. In M. Specter, B. B. Lockee, & M. D. Childress (Eds.), Learning, Design, and Technology. An International Compendium of Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy. A Major Reference Work from AECT-Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17727-4_180-1
Conery, J. S. (2010). Ubiquity symposium 'What is computation?' Computation is symbol manipulation. Ubiquity, 2010(November).
Denning, P. J. (2009). The profession of IT Beyond computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 52(6), 28-30. https://doi.org/10.1145/1516046.1516054
Denning, P. J., & Tedre, M. (2021). Computational Thinking: A Disciplinary Perspective [Article]. Informatics in Education, 20(3), 361-390. https://doi.org/10.15388/infedu.2021.21
DiSessa, A. A. (2001). Changing minds: Computers, learning, and literacy. Mit Press.
Dohn, N. B. (2018). Introduction: Competence demands in today's networked world. In N. B. Dohn (Ed.), Designing for learning in a networked world (pp. 3-24). Routledge.
Dohn, N. B. (2021). Kapitel 1. Computational Thinking - indplacering i et landskab af it-begreber. In N. B. Dohn, R. Mitchell, & R. Chongtay (Eds.), Computational thinking – teoretiske, empiriske og didaktiske perspektiver. Samfundslitteratur.
Dohn, N. B., Mitchell, R., & Chongtay, R. (2021). Introduktion. In N. B. Dohn, R. Mitchell, & R. Chongtay (Eds.), Computational thinking – teoretiske, empiriske og didaktiske perspektiver. Samfundslitteratur.
Erstad, O., & Voogt, J. (2018). The Twenty-First Century Curriculum: Issues and Challenges. In: Voogt, J., Knezek, G., Christensen, R., Lai, KW. (eds) Second Handbook of Information Technology in Primary and Secondary Education. Springer International Handbooks of Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71054-9_1
Grover, S., & Pea, R. (2018). Computational Thinking: A competency whose time has come. In S. Sentence, E. Barendsen, C. Schulte (eds) Computer science education: Perspectives on teaching and learning in school, 19-38. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Hansson, S. O. (2018). Mathematical and technological computability. In Hansson, S. O. (ed) Technology and Mathematics. Philosophy of Engineering and Technology 30, (pp. 185-234): Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93779-3_9
Haseski, H. İ., Ilic, U., & Tugtekin, U. (2018). Defining a New 21st Century Skill-Computational Thinking: Concepts and Trends. International Education Studies, 11(4), 29-42. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v11n4p29
Hemmendinger, D. (2010). A plea for modesty. ACM Inroads, 1(2), 4-7. https://doi.org/10.1145/1805724.1805725
Iversen, O. S., Smith, R. C., & Dindler, C. (2018). From computational thinking to computational empowerment: A 21st century PD agenda. Proceedings of the 15th Participatory Design Conference: Full Papers-Volume 1, https://doi.org/10.1145/3210586.3210592
Kafai, Y., Proctor, C., & Lui, D. (2020). From theory bias to theory dialogue: embracing cognitive, situated, and critical framings of computational thinking in K-12 CS education. ACM Inroads, 11(1), 44-53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3381887
Kite, V., Park, S., & Wiebe, E. (2021). The code-centric nature of computational thinking education: A review of trends and issues in computational thinking education research. Sage Open, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211016418
Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice: Mind, mathematics and culture in everyday life. Cambridge University Press.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge university press.
Liao, C. H., Chiang, C.-T., Chen, I., & Parker, K. R. (2022). Exploring the relationship between computational thinking and learning satisfaction for non-STEM college students. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19(1), 1-21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41239-022-00347-5
Lye, S. Y., & Koh, J. H. L. (2014). Review on teaching and learning of computational thinking through programming: What is next for K-12? Computers in Human Behavior, 41, 51-61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.09.012
Pande, P. (2021). Learning and expertise with scientific external representations: an embodied and extended cognition model. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 20(3), 463-482. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-020-09686-y
Resnick, M. (2017). Lifelong kindergarten. Culture of Creativity: Nurturing creative mindsets across cultures, 50-52.
Resnick, M., Maloney, J., Monroy-Hernández, A., Rusk, N., Eastmond, E., Brennan, K., Millner, A., Rosenbaum, E., Silver, J., & Silverman, B. (2009). Scratch: programming for all. Communications of the ACM, 52(11), 60-67. https://doi.org/10.1145/1592761.1592779
Rienecker, L., & Jørgensen, P. S. (2017). Den gode opgave - håndbog i opgaveskrivning på videregående uddannelser. Samfundslitteratur.
Sales, T. (1997). Llull as computer scientist or why Llull was one of us. In: Bertran, M., Rus, T. (eds) Transformation-Based Reactive Systems Development. ARTS 1997. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1231. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-63010-4_2
Shute, V. J., Sun, C., & Asbell-Clarke, J. (2017). Demystifying computational thinking. Educational Research Review, 22, 142-158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.09.003
Skiena, S. S. (2020). The algorithm design manual. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54256-6_13
Skulmowski, A., & Rey, G. D. (2018). Embodied learning: introducing a taxonomy based on bodily engagement and task integration. Cognitive research: principles and implications, 3(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-018-0092-9
Tekdal, M. (2021). Trends and development in research on computational thinking. Education and Information Technologies, 26(5), 6499-6529. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10617-w
Tikva, C., & Tambouris, E. (2021). A systematic mapping study on teaching and learning Computational Thinking through programming in higher education. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 41, 100849. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100849
Uckelman, S. L. (2010). Computing with Concepts, Computing with Numbers: Llull, Leibniz, and Boole. In F. Ferreira, B. Löwe, E. Mayordomo, & L. Mendes Gomes, Programs, Proofs, Processes. CiE 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6158. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13962-8_47
Valente, A., & Marchetti, E. (2020). Playful Learning and shared Computational Thinking: the PaCoMa case study. Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Computers in Education, ICCE 2020,
Vestergaard, J. (2007). Hvad er et mediesystem, og hvordan analyserer man det? In Tv-produktion-nye vilkår (pp. 55-82). København: Samfundslitteratur.
Voogt, J., & Erstad, O. (2018). Section Introduction: Curricular Challenges of the Twenty-First Century. In J. Voogt, G. Knezek, R. Christensen, & K.-W. Lai (Eds.), Second Handbook of Information Technology in Primary and Secondary Education (pp. 15-17). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71054-9_96
Voogt, J., Erstad, O., Dede, C., & Mishra, P. (2013). Challenges to learning and schooling in the digital networked world of the 21st century. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(5), 403-413. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12029
Voogt, J., Fisser, P., Good, J., Mishra, P., & Yadav, A. (2015). Computational thinking in compulsory education: Towards an agenda for research and practice. Education and Information Technologies, 20(4), 715-728. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-015-9412-6
Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33-35.
Wing, J. M. (2010). Computational Thinking: What and Why? https://www.cs.cmu.edu/~CompThink/resources/TheLinkWing.pdf
Yadav, A., Hong, H., & Stephenson, C. (2016). Computational thinking for all: Pedagogical approaches to embedding 21st century problem solving in K-12 classrooms. TechTrends, 60(6), 565-568. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-016-0087-7
Downloads
Publiceret
Citation/Eksport
Nummer
Sektion
Licens
Copyright (c) 2023 Inger-Marie Falgren Christensen
Dette værk er under følgende licens Creative Commons Navngivelse – Ikke-kommerciel – Ingen Bearbejdede Værker (by-nc-nd).
Artikler publiceret i Tidsskriftet for Læring og Medier er licenseret under en Creative Commons Navngivelse-IkkeKommerciel-IngenBearbejdelse 4.0 Unported Licens.
Forfattere bevarer deres ophavsret og giver tidsskriftet ret til første publicering, samtidigt med at værket er omfattet af Creative Commons Attribution-licensen: Navngivelse – Ikke-kommerciel - Ingen Bearbejdede Værker (by-nc-nd). Læs om licensen på http://www.creativecommons.dk/om/.
---
På LOM.dk kan du endvidere finde artikler fra det nu nedlagte Tidsskrift for Universiteternes Efter- og Videreuddannelse (UNEV). Vær opmærksom på, at der gælder særlige regler for UNEV artikler:
Det er forfatterne og evt. andre ophavsret indehavere, der har ophavsretten til artikler udgivet i UNEV regi, og det er en betingelse for adgang til artiklerne, at brugere anerkender og overholder de juridiske retningslinjer forbundet hermed.
- Brugere må downloade og printe én kopi af en hvilken som helst UNEV artikel mhp. private studier eller forskning.
- Det er ikke tilladt at videredistribuere artikler eller anvende disse til indtægtsdækkede aktiviteter eller kommercielle formål.
- Det er tilladt at distribuere URL’en til UNEV artikler.
