Blended learning i de praktisk-musiske fag set gennem et systematisk litteratur-review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/lom.v12i22.115833Nøgleord:
Blended learning, innovation, litteratur review, læreruddannelse, praktisk-musiske fagResumé
Blended learning er i dansk sammenhæng et veletableret begreb, som betegner koblingen af fysiske undervisnings- og læringsrum med læringsrum online – en forståelse som i særlig grad er en udfordring for udvikling af blendede forløb til praktisk-musiske fag. Med afsæt i en kritisk diskussion af traditionelle forståelser af blended learning undersøges andre forståelser og formater blandt andet udfoldet i et innovationsteoretisk perspektiv. I form af et litteraturreview af international forskning diskuteres følgende spørgsmål: Hvordan kan undervisning i praktiske færdigheder i et blended learning format uden F2F kollaboration og delte sansemotorisk erfaringer udfoldes på nye måder med udgangspunkt i Systematisk Innovativ Tænkning? Artiklen formidler resultaterne fra første del af et flerårigt empirisk forskningsprojekt, som følger udvikling, test og redesign af et nyt blended format for uddannelse og efteruddannelse af folkeskolelærere i de praktisk-musiske fag.
Downloads
Referencer
Referencer
Atmacasoy, A., & Aksu, M. (2018). Blended Learning at Pre-Service Teacher Education in Turkey: A Systematic Review. Education and Information Technologies, 23(6), 2399–2422.
Bang, J., Dalsgaard, C., & Kjær, A. (2007). Beyond blended learning! Undiscovered potentials for e-learning in organizational learning. E-learning Papers.
Barak, M. (2004). Systematic Approaches for Inventive Thinking and Problem-Solving: Implications for Engineering Education. In: Int. J. Engng Ed. Vol. 20, No. 4, pp. 612-618.
Boelens, R., De Wever, B., & Voet, M. (2017). Four key challenges to the design of blended learning: A systematic literature review. Educational Research Review, 22, 1–18.
Bernard, R., Borokhovski, E., Schmid, R., Tamim, R., & Abrami, P. (2014). A meta-analysis of blended learning and technology use in higher education: from the general to the applied. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 26(1), 87–122.
Bhabha, H. K. (1994). The location of culture. New York, NY: Routledge.
Bonk, C. J., & Graham, C. R. (Eds.). (2006). The handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer
Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Method Approaches (Third edition). Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE.
Dalsgaard, Christian (2006b). Kan blended learning overskride e-læringens begrænsninger? – Lederuddannelse som blended learning. Center for It og Læring. http://old.imv.au.dk/-forskning/cil/seminarer/organisatorisk.html/Kan_blended_learning_overskride_elaeringens_begraensninger.pdf (9. januar, 2007).
Dalsgaard, Christian & Godsk, Mikkel. (2007). Transforming traditional lessons into problembased blended learning: Experiences and challenges. Open learning, Vol. 22, No. 1, p. 29-42.
DeSanctis, G., and R.B., Gallupe, (1987), A foundation for the study of group decision support systems, Management Science, Vol 33, no. 5, May 1987, p. 589-609
Garrison, D. R., & Vaughan, N. D. (2008). Blended learning in higher education: Framework, principles,and guidelines. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Georgsen, M. (2004). Kvalitet og fleksibilitet i netstøttet læring: en indledning. I M. Georgsen, & J. Bennedsen (red.), Fleksibel læring og undervisning: erfaringer, konsekvenser og muligheder med ikt (s. 9-23). Aalborg: Aalborg Universitetsforlag.
Hart, C. (2018). Doing a Literature Review: Releasing the Research Imagination. London: SAGE.
Johansen, R. (1988). Groupware: Computer Support for Business Teams, Free Press, New York.
Vignare, K. (2007). Review of Literature Blended Learning: Using ALN to Change the Classroom – Will it Work? In: Picciano, Anthony G. og Dziuban, Charles D. (ed.) Blended Learning – Research Perspectives. USA, Sloan-C.
Vo, H. M., Zhu, C., & Diep, N. A. (2017). The effect of blended learning on student performance at course-level in higher education: A meta-analysis. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 53, 17–28.
Yao, C. (2018). How a Blended Learning Environment in Adult Education Promotes Sustainable Development in China. Australian Journal of Adult Learning, 58(3), 480–502.
Zhou, M., & Li, Z. (2019). Blended mobile learning in theatre arts classrooms in higher education. Innovations in Education & Teaching International, 56(3), 307–317.
Specifikke referencer, som er inkluderet i review’et
Archer, C., & Kelen, C. (2015). Dialogic pedagogy in creative practice: a conversation in examples. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 23(2), 175–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2014.932301
Berry, S. (2019). Professional development for online faculty: instructors’ perspectives on cultivating technical, pedagogical and content knowledge in a distance program. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 31(1), 121–136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-018-9194-0
Birt, J., Moore, E., & Cowling, M. (2017). Improving paramedic distance education through mobile mixed reality simulation. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 33(6), 69–83. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.3596
Blackburn, G. (2017). A university’s strategic adoption process of an PBL-aligned eLearning environment: an exploratory case study. Educational Technology Research & Development, 65(1), 147–176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9472-3
Brinson, J. R. (2015). Learning outcome achievement in non-traditional (virtual and remote) versus traditional (hands-on)laboratories: A review of the empirical research. Computers & Education 87 (2015) 218-237.
Carmouche, M., Thompson, J., & Carter, L. (2018). Effects of Professional Development and Videoconferencing on the Increase of Opportunities to Respond and the on-Task Behavior of Students with Emotional Behavior Disorders. Journal of Information Technology Education, 17, 127–157. https://doi.org/10.28945/4060
Chao, S.-Y., Chang, Y.-C., Yang, S. c., & Clark, M. j. (2017). Development, implementation, and effects of an integrated web-based teaching model in a nursing ethics course. Nurse Education Today, 55, 31–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2017.04.011
Chinnasamy, J., Ramesh Babu, K. S., Chenniappan, M., & Rathinasamy, P. (2018). A workbench for motion control experiments using programmable automation controllers in industrial automation laboratory at Kongu Engineering College. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 26(3), 566–576. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.21908
Del Fatto, V., Dodero, G., & Gennari, R. (2016). How measuring student performances allows for measuring blended extreme apprenticeship for learning Bash programming. Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 1231–1240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.04.007
Devlin, A. M., Lally, V., Sclater, M., & Parussel, K. (2015). Inter-Life: a novel, three-dimensional, virtual learning environment for life transition skills learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 23, 405–424. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2013.768271
Dolan, E., Hancock, E., & Wareing, A. (2015). An evaluation of online learning to teach practical competencies in undergraduate health science students. Internet & Higher Education, 24, 21–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.09.003
Dredger, K., Nobles, S., & Martin, J. M. (2017). Digital Poetry Practicum: Preservice English Language Arts Teachers’ Dispositions of New Literacies. Journal of Literacy & Technology, 18(1), 157–203.
Erol, R., Upton, P., & Upton, D. (2016). Supporting completion of an online continuing professional development programme for newly qualified practitioners: A qualitative evaluation. Nurse Education Today, 42, 62–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2016.04.005
Faulconer, E. K., & Gruss, A. B. (2018). A Review to Weigh the Pros and Cons of Online, Remote, and Distance Science Laboratory Experiences. International Review of Research in Open & Distance Learning, 19(2), 155–168. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v19i2.3386
Ferrone, M., Kebodeaux, C., Fitzgerald, J., & Holle, L. (2017). Implementation of a virtual dispensing simulator to support US pharmacy education. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching & Learning, 9(4), 511–520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2017.03.018
Hewitt, A. (2015). Can you learn to lawyer online? A blended learning environment case study. Law Teacher, 49(1), 92–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/03069400.2014.991484
Hunma, A. (2018). “Students Make History Every Day Just by Sitting on These Steps”: Performative Spaces and Re-Genring in the South. Education as Change, 22(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.25159/1947-9417/706
Hwang, G.-J., Chang, S.-C., Chen, P.-Y., & Chen, X.-Y. (2018). Effects of integrating an active learning-promoting mechanism into location-based real-world learning environments on students’ learning performances and behaviors. Educational Technology Research & Development, 66(2), 451–474. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-017-9567-5
Hämäläinen, R., & Cattaneo, A. (2015). New TEL Environments for Vocational Education - Teacher’s Instructional Perspective. Vocations & Learning, 8(2), 135–157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-015-9128-1
Kalpakis, S., Palaigeorgiou, G., & Kasvikis, K. (2018). Promoting Historical Thinking in Schools through Low Fidelity, Low-Cost, Easily Reproduceable, Tangible and Embodied Interactions. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 13(12), 67–82. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v13i12.8728
Kumar, S., & Johnson, M. (2019). Online mentoring of dissertations: the role of structure and support. Studies in Higher Education, 44(1), 59–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2017.1337736
Kyungsun Park. (2015). Instructional Design Models for Blended Learning in Engineering Education. International Journal of Engineering Education, 31(2), 476–485.
Lara, B., Cañas, F., Vidal, A., Nadal, N., Rius, F., Paredes, E., … Mauricio, D. (2017). Knowledge management through two virtual communities of practice (Endobloc and Pneumobloc). Health Informatics Journal, 23(3), 170–180. https://doi.org/10.1177/1460458216639739
Lee, K. (2018). Everyone already has their community beyond the screen: reconceptualizing online learning and expanding boundaries. Educational Technology Research & Development, 66(5), 1255–1268. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-018-9613-y
Martin, F., & Ertzberger, J. (2016). Effects of reflection type in the here and now mobile learning environment. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(5), 932–944. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12327
McDaniels, M., Pfund, C., & Barnicle, K. (2016). Creating Dynamic Learning Communities in Synchronous Online Courses: One Approach From the Center for the Integration of Research, Teaching and Learning (CIRTL). Online Learning, 20(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v20i1.518
McQuade, S., Davis, L., & Nash, C. (2015). Positioning Mentoring as a Coach Development Tool: Recommendations for Future Practice and Research. Quest (00336297), 67(3), 317–329. https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2015.1048810
Moran, C. M. (2018). Learners Without Borders: Connected Learning in a Digital Third Space. Contemporary Issues in Technology & Teacher Education, 18(2), 9–9.
Nikolai, J. R. A., Bennett, G., Marks, S., & Gilson, G. (2019). Active Learning and Teaching through Digital Technology and Live Performance: “Choreographic Thinking” as Art Practice in the Tertiary Sector. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 38(1), 137–152. https://doi.org/10.1111/jade.12181
Owen, H., Whalley, R., Dunmill, M., & Eccles, H. (2018). Social Impact in Personalised Virtual Professional Development Pathways. Journal of Educators Online, 15(1), 63–75. https://doi.org/10.9743/JEO2018.15.1.9
Reese, J. (2016). Virtual Mentoring of Preservice Teachers. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 25(3), 39–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/1057083715577793
Reese, J. (2017). An Exploration of Interactions Between Virtual Mentors and Preservice Teachers. Contributions to Music Education, 42, 201–222. https://doi.org/10.2307/26367443
Stanley, M. J., Serratos, J., Matthew, W., Fernandez, D., & Dang, M. (2018). Integrating Video Simulation Scenarios Into Online Nursing Instruction. Journal of Nursing Education, 57(4), 245–249. https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20180322-11
Stapleton, J., Tschida, C., & Cuthrell, K. (2017). Partnering Principal and Teacher Candidates: A Virtual Coaching Model Co-Teaching in Clinical Practice View project Virtual Coaching of Teacher Candidates View project. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education , 4(1).
Sun, S. Y. H. (2018). Student configuration and place-making in fully online language learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(8), 932–959. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1466808
Tanis, H., & Barker, I. (2017). E-Mentoring at a Distance: An Approach to Support Professional Development in Workplaces. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education (TOJDE), 18(3), 135–155.
Teräs, H., & Kartoğlu, Ü. (2018). Authentic learning with technology for professional development in vaccine management. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 34(3), 15–29.
Downloads
Publiceret
Citation/Eksport
Nummer
Sektion
Licens
Artikler publiceret i Tidsskriftet for Læring og Medier er licenseret under en Creative Commons Navngivelse-IkkeKommerciel-IngenBearbejdelse 4.0 Unported Licens.
Forfattere bevarer deres ophavsret og giver tidsskriftet ret til første publicering, samtidigt med at værket er omfattet af Creative Commons Attribution-licensen: Navngivelse – Ikke-kommerciel - Ingen Bearbejdede Værker (by-nc-nd). Læs om licensen på http://www.creativecommons.dk/om/.
---
På LOM.dk kan du endvidere finde artikler fra det nu nedlagte Tidsskrift for Universiteternes Efter- og Videreuddannelse (UNEV). Vær opmærksom på, at der gælder særlige regler for UNEV artikler:
Det er forfatterne og evt. andre ophavsret indehavere, der har ophavsretten til artikler udgivet i UNEV regi, og det er en betingelse for adgang til artiklerne, at brugere anerkender og overholder de juridiske retningslinjer forbundet hermed.
- Brugere må downloade og printe én kopi af en hvilken som helst UNEV artikel mhp. private studier eller forskning.
- Det er ikke tilladt at videredistribuere artikler eller anvende disse til indtægtsdækkede aktiviteter eller kommercielle formål.
- Det er tilladt at distribuere URL’en til UNEV artikler.
