Facilitation of evidence-based discussions in an Emergency Department
PDF (Dansk)

Keywords

Evidensbaseret sygepleje
Akutsygepleje
Klinisk beslutningstagen

How to Cite

Hjersing, B., Larsen, A. V., Hansen, C. M., List, A. B., & Østervang, C. (2025). Facilitation of evidence-based discussions in an Emergency Department. Dansk Tidsskrift for Akutmedicin, 8(2), 4–17. https://doi.org/10.7146/akut.v8i2.138346

Abstract

Background: Evidence-based practice (EBP) is a means for clinicians to minimize the gap between theory and practice. EBP is grounded in decision-making and is employed to optimize patient outcomes and enhance clinical practice. To strengthen clinicians' focus on EBP in the Emergency Department (ED), we introduced 10 minutes of professional nursing-related discussion daily. A nurse leader and a clinical nurse specialist facilitated the sessions, using the EBP model to structure the discussion.

Objective: The aim was to explore clinicians’ assessment of '10 Professional Minutes' and their experience of its professional value in relation to clinical practice.

Method: Each day, a nurse from the ED chose a topic for discussion. A clinical nurse specialist and a staff nurse facilitated the discussion by using a flip-over to illustrate the topic in the EBP model. To evaluate the project, a questionnaire containing 11 questions was distributed to all nurses at the ED (n = 116) after 4½ months. Two focus group interviews with clinicians and leaders were conducted to elaborate on the survey.

Results: The questionnaire had a response rate of 72%. 61% of the clinicians answered that ‘10 professional minutes’ had influenced their nursing practice. 54% gained an increased focus on guidelines and a search for evidence. Clinicians with education between 3-6 years evaluated ’10 professional minutes’ contribution to clinical practice the lowest. From the focus group interviews, two themes emerged: 1) Opportunities and barriers for nursing reflection and peer support, and 2) Concerns about exposing one's own lack of knowledge.

Conclusion: In conclusion, ‘10 professional minutes facilitate an increased focus on evidence-based work. It creates room for nursing-related discussion and reflection in the clinicians’ daily work. Special attention must be directed towards its intent to prevent the feeling of being professionally questioned.

https://doi.org/10.7146/akut.v8i2.138346
PDF (Dansk)

References

Hagstrøm, J. and A.C. Engers, Kvalitet og udvikling. 1. udgave ed. Sosuserien. SSA. 2018, Kbh.: Munksgaard. 207 sider.

Aiken, L.H., et al., Nurse staffing and education and hospital mortality in nine European countries: a retrospective observational study. Lancet, 2014. 383(9931): p. 1824-30.

Considine, J. and B. McGillivray, An evidence-based practice approach to improving nursing care of acute stroke in an Australian Emergency Department. J Clin Nurs, 2010. 19(1-2): p. 138-44.

Mackey, A. and S. Bassendowski, The History of Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing Education and Practice. J Prof Nurs, 2017. 33(1): p. 51-55.

Willman, A.S., Peter; Bahtsevani,Christel, Evidensbaseret sygepleje : en bro mellem forskning og klinisk virksomhed. 2. udgave, oversat fra svensk af Kent Havemann & Gitte Lyngs ed. 2007, Kbh.: Gad. 201 sider.

Sackett, D.L., et al., Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't. BMJ, 1996. 312(7023): p. 71-72.

Fitzpatrick, B., K. Bloore, and N. Blake, Joy in Work and Reducing Nurse Burnout: From Triple Aim to Quadruple Aim. AACN Adv Crit Care, 2019. 30(2): p. 185-188.

Schaefer, J.D. and J.M. Welton, Evidence based practice readiness: A concept analysis. J Nurs Manag, 2018. 26(6): p. 621-629.

Yoo, J.Y., et al., Clinical nurses' beliefs, knowledge, organizational readiness and level of implementation of evidence-based practice: The first step to creating an evidence-based practice culture. PLoS One, 2019. 14(12): p. e0226742.

Universitetshospital, O. Strategi for sygepleje 2020-2023, tættere på patienten i alle opgaver. 2020 [cited 2022 0410].

Creswell, J.W. and V.L.P. Clark, Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Third edition ed. 2018, Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications Inc. xxvii, 492 s.

Fetters, M.D., L.A. Curry, and J.W. Creswell, Achieving integration in mixed methods designs-principles and practices. Health Serv Res, 2013. 48(6 Pt 2): p. 2134-56.

Hansen, N.-H.M., B. Marckmann, and E. Nørregård-Nielsen, Spørgeskemaer i virkeligheden:-målgrupper, design og svarkategorier. 2008: Samfundslitteratur.

Halkier, B., Fokusgrupper. 3. udgave ed. 2016, Frederiksberg: Samfundslitteratur. 126 sider.

Petersen, R.A., Deskriptiv statistik, in Analysestrategier i sundhedsfaglige undersøgelser. 2023, Samfundslitteratur. p. 113-126.

Kirk, J.W., Implementing evidence‐based practices in an emergency department: contradictions exposed when prioritising a flow culture. Journal of clinical nursing, 2016. 25(3-4): p. 555-565.

Panda, S., et al., Challenges faced by student nurses and midwives in clinical learning environment - A systematic review and meta-synthesis. Nurse Educ Today, 2021. 101: p. 104875.

Dearnley, C., et al., Team based learning in nursing and midwifery higher education; a systematic review of the evidence for change. Nurse Educ Today, 2018. 60: p. 75-83.

Boolsen, M.W., Spørgeskemaundersøgelser. 2008: Hans Reitzels Forlag.

Morgan, D.L. and J.L. Bottorff, Advancing our craft: focus group methods and practice. Qual Health Res, 2010. 20(5): p. 579-81.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2025 Barna Hjersing, Astrid Vittrup Larsen, Charlotte Mose Hansen, Anne Bejlegård List, Christina Østervang