At søge indsigt på tværs
Hvordan og hvorfor sammenligne forskelligartede professionsfelter?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/tfp.v16i30.119285Keywords:
kvalitative sammenligningsanalyser, metodologi, abduktion, professionssociologiAbstract
This article argues that qualitative comparative research would benefit from abductive inferences to freeing the practice of comparison from its too-restrictive theory. Challenging some of more traditional and abstract images of how to do comparison within the sociology of professions, we in an ongoing research project engage in an inferential process aimed at conceptual development while seeking to hinder a separation between empirical practices and academic analyses. To demonstrate our methodological considerations, we turn to our research project on professions about professional work changes within three professional proto-jurisdictions of water-related climate adaptation, innovation management, and prevention of lifestyle-related diseases.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Forfatterne bevarer deres ophavsret, men giver tidsskriftet ret til første publicering. Forfatterne kan frit uploade en version af den peer-reviewede artikel andetsteds (parallelpublicering; eller fx oversættelse til internationale tidsskrifter), men med angivelse af, at den har været offentliggjort i TfP først (jf. Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives-licens (cc-by-nd 4.0).
Tidsskrift for Professionsstudier findes både trykt og digitalt. Den trykte udgave har et oplag på 2200 eksemplarer. Den digitale udgave er open-access, hvor alle har mulighed for at læse, downloade, kopiere, distribuere, udskrive og linke til teksten (jf. BOAI-definitionen).