Vol. 23 No. 41 (2024): Care Under Change 2: The Relations of Care
Originalartikler

Online omsorg for patienter med kroniske lidelser: en dynamisk og temporal omsorgspraksis i patientorganiserede fællesskaber på sociale medier

Loni Ledderer
Department of Public Health, Aarhus University
Bio
Amanda Karlsson
Institut for Kommunikation og Kultur, Aarhus Universitet
Bio
Carsten Stage
Institut for Kommunikation og Kultur, Aarhus Universitet
Bio

Published 2024-12-03 — Updated on 2024-12-06

Versions

Keywords

  • online care,
  • sociale media,
  • peer to peer,
  • kronisk lidelse

How to Cite

Ledderer, L., Karlsson, A., & Stage, C. (2024). Online omsorg for patienter med kroniske lidelser: en dynamisk og temporal omsorgspraksis i patientorganiserede fællesskaber på sociale medier . Tidsskrift for Forskning I Sygdom Og Samfund - Journal of Research in Sickness and Society, 23(41). https://doi.org/10.7146/tfss.v23i41.140253 (Original work published December 3, 2024)

Abstract

The responsibility of care has traditionally been associated with the welfare state and health professionals. However, care for patients with chronic diseases is under pressure in today's healthcare system and welfare state. In a time of social media, it becomes essential to extend the traditional understanding of care practices and explore the roles and characteristics of online care practices. The aim of this article is to understand how care practices are produced in peer-led online communities and how social media affects the production of particular forms of care. The article analyses empirical material from two different types of Danish peer-led online communities for patients with chronic conditions and consists of data from an online survey and semi-structured interviews with 21 members/followers.

This article offers a nuanced understanding of care practices that take place on social media in peer-led online communities on two aspects: 1) Online care practices are adaptable to dynamic and continuously changing needs for care and open to shifting roles 2) Online care practices are extremely flexible as they have no fixed time structures and are available around the clock, especially at night when relatives are at sleep and the established health system is closed. The article contributes to the understanding of online care practices by showing that it is a special form of care characterised by its adaptability and temporal flexibility.

References

  1. Andersen, R.S. & Offersen, S.M.H. (2022) Omsorgens moralske pionerer: Om at ‘bo selv’ og forvalte forbundethed og kræftsygdom. Tidsskrift for Forskning i Sygdom og Samfund, nr. 37, 65-85
  2. Andersson, K. (2008) The neglect of time as an aspect of organizing care work in Wrede, et al. Care Work in Crisis: Reclaiming the Nordic Ethos of Care. Studentlitteratur
  3. Baym, N. K. (2010). Personal Connections in the Digital Age, Polity Press. 1-17
  4. Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  5. Dahl, H. M, (2019) Et forandret landskab for ældreomsorg. Politica - Tidsskrift for politisk videnskab, 51(1), 82- 101. http://politica.dk/fileadmin/politica/Dokumenter/politica_51_1/dahl.pdf
  6. Fine, M. D. (2007) A Caring Society?: Care and the Dilemmas of Human Service in the Twenty-First Century. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, Print.
  7. Franzke, A. S., Bechmann, A., Zimmer, M., Ess, C. and the Association of Internet Researchers (2020). Internet Research: Ethical Guidelines 3.0. https://aoir.org/reports/ethics3.pdf
  8. Lassen, T (2013) Patientkultur I et historisk perspektiv i Graubæk, A. Patientologi: at være patient. Gads Forlag. 231-247.
  9. Groenevelt, I (2022) ‘It’s Not All Nice and Fun’: Narrating Contested Illness on YouTube and Instagram.” Health (London, England : 1997), 26(5), 589–604, https://doi.org/10.1177/13634593211017187 .
  10. Kamalpour, M. et al. (2020) How Can Online Communities Support Resilience Factors Among Older Adults. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 2020, 36(14), 1342–53, https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2020.1749817.
  11. Karlsson, A., Stage, C., & Ledderer, L. (2024). Engage and withdraw: The role of peer-led online communities in the configuration of knowledge on chronic illness. Qualitative Health Communication, 3(1), 4–16. https://doi.org/10.7146/qhc.138193
  12. Kingod, N., Cleal, B., Wahlberg, A. & Husted G. R. (2017) Online Peer-to-Peer Communities in the Daily Lives of People with Chronic Illness: A Qualitative Systematic Review. Qualitative Health Research 1, 89-99.
  13. Kleinman, A. (2015) Care: In Search of a Health Agenda. The Lancet (British edition) vil vol 18. n. 386(9990) pp. 240–241. Web. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)61271-5
  14. Kvale, S & Brinkmann S. (2015) Interview: Det kvalitative forskningsinterview som håndværk, 3rd ed. København: Hans Reitzels Forlag.
  15. Lagerkvist, A. (2022) Existential Media: A Media Theory of the Limit Situation. New York, New York: Oxford University Press.
  16. Law, J. (2010) Care and Killing: Tensions in veterinary practice in Mol, A. Moser, I. & Pols, J. 2010, Care in Practice: On Tinkering in Clinics, Homes and Farms, Transcript, Bielefeld, 57-72.
  17. Lawless, M. T., et al. (2022) You Are By No Means Alone: A Netnographic Study of Self-Care Support in an Online Community for Older Adults.” Qualitative Health Research, 32(13) 1935–51, https://doi.org/10.1177/10497323221124979
  18. Lindholm C, Burström B, & Diderichsen F. (2001) Does chronic illness cause adverse social and economic consequences among Swedes? Scand Journal of Public Health. 29(1), 63-70. https://doi.org/10.1177/14034948010290011201
  19. Lupton, D. (2018). Digital Health. Critical and Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives. Routledge.
  20. Maslen, S & Lupton, D. (2018) You Can Explore It More Online: A Qualitative Study on Australian Women’s Use of Online Health and Medical Information.” BMC Health Services Research, 18(1), 916, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3749-7
  21. Mattingly, C., Grøn, L. & Meinert, L. (2011) Chronic homework in emerging borderlands of healthcare. Culture, medicine and psychiatry, 35(3), 347–75 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11013-011-9225-z
  22. Manuel, M., Wagner, A. J. M. & Kinnebrock, S., (2020) Communicative Care in Online Forums: How Burdened Informal Caregivers Seek Mediated Social Support. International Journal of Communication https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/12479 . Print.
  23. Mol, A. (2008) The logic of care. Health and the problem of patient choice. Routledge.
  24. Mol, A., Moser, I., Pols, J. (2010) Putting care into practice in Mol, A. Moser, I. & Pols, J. 2010, Care in Practice: On Tinkering in Clinics, Homes and Farms, Transcript, Bielefeld, 7-25.
  25. Pousti, Hamid, et al. (2014) “Exploring the Role of Social Media in Chronic Care Management: A Sociomaterial Approach.” Information Systems and Global Assemblages. (Re)Configuring Actors, Artefacts, Organizations, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 163–85, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-45708-5_11.
  26. Stage, C., Karlsson, A., & Ledderer, L. (2024). Online Patient Work. European Journal of Health Communication, 5(2), 44-59 https://doi.org/10.47368/ejhc.2024.203
  27. Sundhedsstyrelsen (2022) Danskernes sundhed 2021: Den nationale sundhedsprofil 2021. Sundhedsstyrelsen: Institut for Folkesundhed. https://sst.dk/-/media/Udgivelser/2022/Sundhedsprofil/Sundhedsprofilen.ashx Tilgået 16. juli 2023
  28. Tronto, J. C. (1993) Moral Boundaries: A Political Argument for an Ethic of Care. New York: Routledge.
  29. Tronto, J. C. (1998) An ethic of care. Generations, 22(3), 15-20.
  30. Tronto, J. C., & Fisher, B. (1990) Towards a Feminist Theory of Care. In E. Abel and M. Nelson, eds., Circles of Care. Albany, N.Y.: State University of New York Press 36-54
  31. Tucker, I. M., & Goodings, L. (2017) Digital atmospheres: Affective practices of care in Elefriends. Sociology of Health & Illness, 39(4), 629–642.