Nøgleord
Matematik
peer tutoring
Citation/Eksport
Resumé
Artiklen præsenterer et dansk interventionsprojekt om systematiseret klassekammerathjælp (SYKL) i matematik i 4. klasse, hvor elever samarbejder i makkerpar med skiftende roller som tutor og tutee. Gennem videoanalyse og interviews med elever og lærere undersøges udfordringer i makkersamarbejdet, særligt når elevernes faglige niveauer er forskellige. Analysen peger på et behov for støtte til elevernes refleksion og samarbejdsstrategier. Studiet bidrager med indsigt i, hvordan undervisningen kan tilrettelægges, så alle elever får mulighed for aktiv deltagelse i dialogbaseret matematik, og afsluttes med handleperspektiver for lærere, der ønsker at fremme inkluderende samarbejde.
Referencer
Alegre, F., Moliner, L., Maroto, A. & Lorenzo-Valentin, G. (2019). Peer tutoring in mathematics in primary education: A systematic review. Educational Review, 71(6), 767‑791. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2018.1474176
Alexander, R. (2004). Towards dialogic teaching: Rethinking classroom talk. Dialogos UK.
Alrø, H. & Skovsmose, O. (2004). Dialogue and learning in mathematics education: Intention, reflection, critique. Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/0‑306‑48016‑6
Baker, S., Gersten, R. & Lee, D.S. (2002). A synthesis of empirical research on teaching mathematics to low-achieving students. Elementary School Journal, 103(1), 51‑73. https://doi.org/10.1086/499715
Barnes, D. (2008). Exploratory talk for learning. I N. Mercer & S. Hodginson (red.), Exploring talk in school (s. 1‑16). Sage Publications.
Bartolini, M.G. & Martignone, F. (2014). Manipulatives in mathematics education. I S. Lerman (red.), Encyclopaedia of mathematics education (s. 365‑372). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978‑94‑007‑4978‑8_93
Blomhøj, M. (2021). Samspil mellem fagdidaktisk forskning og udvikling af matematikundervisning – belyst gennem erfaringer fra et udviklingsprojekt i undersøgende matematikundervisning. Sammenlignende fagdidaktik, 6, 29‑50. https://tidsskrift.dk/sammenlignendefagdidaktik/article/download/127569/173839/269450
Boolsen, M.W. (2020). Grounded theory. I S. Brinkmann & L. Tanggaard (red.), Kvalitative metoder – en grundbog (s. 309‑345). Hans Reitzels Forlag.
Bourdieu, P. (1998). Practical reason: On the theory of action. Polity Press.
Clarke, A. (2005). Situational analysis: Grounded theory after the postmodern turn. Sage Publications.
Christensen, V.T., Beuchert, L. & Rasmussen, D. (2023). PISA 2022 – hovedrapport. VIVE. https://www.vive.dk/media/pure/5xp670pz/24426567
Dysthe, O. (1997). Det flerstemmige klasserum. Skrivning og samtale for at lære. Forlaget Klim.
Epinion. (2021). Skoledistrikternes sociale profil 2021. [Anonymiseret kommunenavn].
Esmonde, I. (2009). Explanations in mathematics classrooms: A discourse analysis. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 9(2), 86‑99. https://doi.org/10.1080/14926150902942072
EVA. (2020). Gruppearbejde i folkeskolen – læreres perspektiver på en udbredt og udfordrende undervisningspraksis. Danmarks Evalueringsinstitut.
Falkenberg, L.L., Overgaard, S. & Schmidt, M.C.S. (2023). Systematiseret klassekammerathjælp – fagdidaktisk tilpasset matematik. Københavns Professionshøjskole. https://sykl.kp.dk/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Mat_laerervejledning_SYKL_2023_webudgave.pdf
Falkenberg, L.L. & Petersen, S.K. (2022). Elevers faglige og sociale talehandlinger. I M.C.S. Schmidt & S. Thygesen (red.), “Når jeg hjælper andre, kan jeg bedre forstå det selv” – om undersøgende samtaler i makkerpar (s. 23‑36). Københavns Professionshøjskole.
Flyvbjerg, B. (2020). Fem misforståelser om casestudiet. I S. Brinkmann & L. Tanggaard (red.), Kvalitative metoder – en grundbog (s. 621‑656). Hans Reitzels Forlag.
Gill, P. & Remedios, R. (2013). How should researchers in Education operationalise on-task behaviours? Cambridge Journal of Education, 43(2), 199‑222. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2013.767878
Gillies, R.M. (2013). Productive academic talk during inquiry-based science. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 8(2), 126‑142. https://doi.org/10.1080/1554480X.2013.767770
Godwin, K.E., Almeda, M.V.Q., Baker, R.S. & Fisher, A.V. (2016). The variable relationship between on-task behavior and learning. I Proceedings of the 38th annual meeting of the cognitive science society (s. 812‑817). http://www.upenn.edu/learninganalytics/ryanbaker/Godwin_Cogsci_2016_Final.pdf
Hattie, J. (2013). Synlig læring – for lærere. Dafolo.
Hundeide, K. (2004). Relationsarbejde i institution og skole. Dafolo.
Johansson, M. (2007). Mathematical meaning making and textbook tasks. For the Learning of Mathematics, 27(1), 45‑51. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40248561
Johnsen-Høines, M. & Alrø, H. (2012). Trenger en å spørre for å være spørrende? I M. Johnsen-Høines & H. Alrø (red.), Læringssamtalen i matematikkfagets praksis. Bok 1 (s. 79‑96). Caspar Forlag.
Kagan, S. & Stenlev, J. (2006). Cooperative learning – undervisning med samarbejdsstrukturer. Malling Beck.
Kjeldsen, C.C., Kristensen, R.M., Bindslev, S.G. & Christensen, A.A. (2021). Matematik og natur/ teknologi i 4. klasse. Sammenfatning af TIMSS-undersøgelsen 2019. Aarhus Universitetsforlag.
Komatsu, K. (2010). Counter-examples for refinement of conjectures and proofs in primary school mathematics. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 29(1), 1‑10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2010.01.003
Kunsch, C.A., Jitendra, A.K. & Sood, S. (2007). The effects of peer-mediated instruction in mathematics for students with learning problems: A research synthesis. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 22(1), 1‑12. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540‑5826.2007.00226.x
Kvale, S. (1997). Interview – en introduktion til det kvalitative forskningsinterview. Hans Reitzels Forlag.
Langer-Osuna, J. (2018). Productive disruptions: Rethinking the role of off-task interactions in collaborative mathematics learning. Education Sciences, 8(2), 1‑11. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci8020087
Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (2012). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.
Levenson, E., Tirosh, D. & Tsamir, P. (2006). Mathematically and practically-based explanations: Individual preferences and sociomathematical norms. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 4(2), 319‑344. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763‑005‑9011-x
Levine, J. & Moreland, R.L. (1994). Group socialization: Theory and research. European Review of Social Psychology, 5(1), 305‑336. https://doi.org/10.1080/14792779543000093
Lindenskov, L.B. (2022). Problemløsning i samarbejde – samarbejde i problemløsning. I M.C.S. Schmidt & S. Thygesen (red.), “Når jeg hjælper andre, kan jeg bedre forstå det selv” – om undersøgende samtaler i makkerpar (s. 73‑84). Københavns Professionshøjskole. https://sykl.kp.dk/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/SYKL_Antologi_webudgave.pdf
Nawaz, A. & Rehman, Z.U. (2017). Strategy of peer tutoring and students’ success in mathematics: An analysis. Journal of Research and Reflections in Education, 11(1), 15‑30. https://ue.edu.pk/jrre/articles/1101002.pdf
Pihl, M.D. & Jensen, T.L. (2021). Unge uden job og uddannelse. Arbejderbevægelsens Erhvervsråd.
Pólya, G. (1979). More on guessing and proving. The Two-Year College Mathematics Journal, 10(4), 255‑258. https://doi.org/10.2307/3026620
Rasmussen, K. & Schmidt, M.C.S. (2022). Together in adidactic situation: Student dialogue during reciprocal peer tutoring in mathematics. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 3, 100126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2022.100126
Rasmussen, M.D. (2020). At se med andres øjne. Et studie af kollektive fortolkningsprocesser i gruppesamtaler i grundskolens litteraturundervisning. Ph.d.-afhandling. Aarhus Universitet.
Schmidt, M.C.S. (2015). Sociofaglig inklusion og elevfællesskaber. Til didaktiseringen af kammerathjælp i matematikundervisning på folkeskolens begyndertrin. Nordisk Matematikkdidaktikk, 20(2), 27‑52. https://doi.org/10.7146/nomad.v20i2.148675
Schmidt, M.C.S. & Thygesen, S. (2024). Think carefully, let’s bond, and other tutoring strategies: Socio-academic participation patterns in peer tutoring. European Journal of Inclusive Education, 3(1), 25‑42. https://doi.org/10.7146/ejie.v3i1.137726
Slavin, R.E. & Lake, C. (2008). Effective programs in elementary mathematics: A best-evidence synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 78(3), 427‑515. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308317473
Storm-Andersen, M. & Andersen, M.F. (2022). Undersøgende samtaler i makkerpar – om SYKL i teori og praksis i matematik og natur/teknologi. I M.C.S. Schmidt & S. Thygesen (red.), “Når jeg hjælper andre, kan jeg bedre forstå det selv” – om undersøgende samtaler i makkerpar (s. 13‑23). Københavns Professionshøjskole. https://sykl.kp.dk/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/SYKL_Antologi_webudgave.pdf
Sutherland, J. (2015). Going ‘meta’: Using a metadiscoursal approach to develop secondary students’ dialogic talk in small groups. Research Papers in Education, 30(1), 44‑69. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2013.850528
Svendsen, A.M.B., Lund, H., Lind, S. & Bohnstedt, M.K. (2019). At stå udenfor. Hvordan styrker vi positive fællesskaber blandt børn og unge? Børns Vilkår og TrygFonden.
Thurston, A., Keere, K., Topping, K., Kosack, W., Gatt, S., Marchal, J., Mestdagh, N., Schmeinck, D., Sidor, W. & Donnert, K. (2007). Peer learning in primary school science: Theoretical perspectives and implications for classroom practice. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 5(13), 477‑496. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/9048918.pdf
Thurston, A., Roseth, C., Chiang, T.-H., Burns, V. & Topping, K.J. (2020). The influence of social relationships on outcomes in mathematics when using peer tutoring in elementary school. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 1, 100004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2020.100004
Topping, K.J. (2005). Trends in peer learning. Educational Psychology, 25(6), 631‑645. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410500345172
Tsuei, M. (2017). Learning behaviours of low-achieving children’s mathematics learning in using of helping tools in a synchronous peer-tutoring system. Interactive Learning Environments, 25(2), 147‑161. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2016.1276078
Vogel, R. & Huth, M. (2010). Mathematical cognitive processes between the poles of mathematical technical terminology and the verbal expressions of pupils. CERME, 6, 1033‑1042.
Vygotsky, L.S. (2019). Tænkning og sprog. Akademisk Forlag.
Wahyuni, A. (2018). The power of verbal and nonverbal communication in learning. I Proceedings of the 1st international conference on intellectuals’ global responsibility (ICIGR 2017). Advances in social science, education and humanities research. https://doi.org/10.2991/icigr-17.2018.19
Yackel, E. & Cobb, P. (1996). Sociomathematical norms, argumentation, and autonomy in mathematics. Journal for research in mathematics education, 27(4), 458‑477. https://doi.org/10.2307/749877
Zack, V. & Graves, B. (2008). Making mathematical meaning through dialogue: “Once you think of it, the Z minus three seems pretty weird”. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 46(1), 229‑271. https://doi.org/10.1007/0‑306‑48085‑9_7
Dette værk er under følgende licens Creative Commons Navngivelse –Ikke-kommerciel (by-nc).
Copyright (c) 2025 MONA - Matematik- og Naturfagsdidaktik