Usynlige studerende i åbne online forløb
Nye muligheder for efteruddannelse
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/lom.v12i21.112700Resumé
Formålet med artiklen er at undersøge og diskutere, hvordan såkaldte usynlige studerende deltager i åbne online forløb, og hvordan og hvad de lærer. Usynlige studerende betegner i denne artikel de deltagere, der er inaktive, tilsyneladende falder fra, og som ikke gennemfører de obligatoriske kursusaktiviteter. Artiklen indledes med et overbliksreview af central litteratur inden for “open education” med særligt fokus på målet om at nå målgrupper, der ikke nås gennem traditionel uddannelse. Artiklen er baseret på et kvalitativt studie, som er funderet i 11 interviews og 51 spørgeskemabesvarelser. Analysen udpeger fem forskellige måder at deltage på i et online undervisningsforløb: Studerende, deltagere, medlemmer, observatører og gæster. Artiklen sætter i analysen af den empiriske undersøgelse fokus på, hvad og hvordan de usynlige studerende lærer gennem åbne online forløb. Analysen leder frem til fem centrale aktiviteter for usynlige studerendes læring: 1) at læse og se indhold, 2) at følge med og være en del af, 3) deltage i netværk, 4) reflektere og 5) anvende og ibrugtage. Endelig peger analysen på tre centrale former for udbytte for de usynlige studerende: 1) faglig inspiration, 2) at blive opdateret, samt 3) at få input til egen praksis. Resultaterne peger på, at der især er muligheder i at udvikle nye efteruddannelses-formater, der kan bidrage til usynlige studerendes egen kontekst - uden at etablere traditionelle kursusforløb med fastlagt læringsmål.
Downloads
Referencer
Alexander, I. D., & Fink, A. (2018). Designing an Inclusive Intercultural Online Participatory Seminar for Higher Education Teachers and Professionals. In N. Bonderup Dohn, S. Cranmer, J.-A. Sime, M. de Laat, & T. Ryberg (Eds.), Networked Learning: Reflections and Challenges (pp. 125–148). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74857-3_8
Baym, N. K. (2015). Personal connections in the digital age. John Wiley & Sons.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Caswell, T., Henson, S., Jensen, M., & Wiley, D. (2008). Open content and open educational resources: Enabling universal education. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 9(1).
Chen, Y. (2014). Investigating MOOCs through blog mining. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(2). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v15i2.1695
Clow, D. (2013). MOOCs and the funnel of participation. The Third International Conference on Learning Analytics.
Daniel, J. (2012). Making sense of MOOCs: Musings in a maze of myth, paradox and possibility. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2012(3). Retrieved from https://www-jime.open.ac.uk/article/view/2012-18/
de Langen, F., & van den Bosch, H. (2013). Massive open online courses: Disruptive innovations or disturbing inventions? Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e- Learning, 28(3), 216-226.
Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. DC Heath.
Dolan, V. L. (2014). Massive online obsessive compulsion: What are they saying out there about the latest phenomenon in higher education? The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(2).
Dron, J. & Anderson, T (2014) Teaching Crowds: Learning and Social Media. Athabasca University Press.
Friesen, N. (2009). Open educational resources: New possibilities for change and sustainability. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 10(5).
Garrison, D. R. (2016). Thinking Collaboratively: Learning in a Community of Inquiry. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315740751
Guest, G., MacQueen, K. M., & Namey, E. E. (2011). Applied thematic analysis. Sage Publications.
Ho, A., Chuang, I., Reich, J., Coleman, C., Whitehill, J., Northcutt, C., … Petersen, R. (2015). HarvardX and MITx: Two Years of Open Online Courses Fall 2012-Summer 2014. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2586847
Hylén, J. (2006). Open educational resources: Opportunities and challenges. Proceedings of Open Education, 49-63.
Jordan, K. (2014). Initial trends in enrolment and completion of massive open online courses. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v15i1.1651
Kizilcec, R. F., Piech, C., & Schneider, E. (2013). Deconstructing disengagement: analyzing learner subpopulations in massive open online courses. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (pp. 170–179). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2460296.2460330
Littlejohn, A., & Hood, N. (2018). Reconceptualising Learning in the Digital Age: The [Un]democratising Potential of MOOCs. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8893-3
Littlejohn, A., Hood, N., Milligan, C., & Mustain, P. (2016). Learning in MOOCs: Motivations and self-regulated learning in MOOCs. The Internet and Higher Education, 29, 40–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.12.003
Littlejohn, A and Pegler, C. (2014). Reusing Resources: Open for Learning. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 1(2). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/2014-02.
McAndrew, P. (2010). Defining openness: updating the concept of" open" for a connected world. Journal of interactive Media in Education, 2, Art-10.
McLuhan, M. (1994) Understanding media: The extensions of man. (MIT eds.) MIT press, 1994.
Milligan, C., & Littlejohn, A. (2017). Why Study on a MOOC? The Motives of Students and Professionals. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(2). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i2.3033
Milligan, C., Littlejohn, A., & Margaryan, A. (2013). Patterns of engagement in connectivist MOOCs. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching / MERLOT, 9(2). Retrieved from http://jolt.merlot.org/vol9no2/abstracts.htm
Nortvig, A. M., Hestbech, A. M. (2016). Nye design for undervisning og uddannelse. København. Dafolo.
Pegler, C. (2012). Herzberg, hygiene and the motivation to reuse: Towards a three-factor theory to explain motivation to share and use OER. Journal of Interactive Media in Education 2012(1):4, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/2012-04
Postman, N. (2000). The humanism of media ecology. Keynote address delivered at the Inaugural Media Ecology Association Convention, June 16–17, Fordham University, NY.
Scolari, C. A. (2012). Media ecology: Exploring the metaphor to expand the theory. Communication theory, 22(2), 204-225.
Siemens, G. (2013). Massive Open Online Courses: Innovation in Education. Open Educational Resources: Innovation, Research and Practice, 5.
Simpson, O. (2013). Student retention in distance education: are we failing our students? Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 28(2), 105–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2013.847363
UNESCO, E. (2000). The Dakar framework for action: Education for all: Meeting our collective commitments. Dakar Senegal, 26-28.
UNESCO (2002). Forum on the impact of Open Courseware for higher education in developing countries final report. Retrieved from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0012/001285/128515e.pdf
Windle, R.J., Wharrad, H, McCormick, D, Laverty, H & Taylor, M.G. (2010). Sharing and reuse in OER: experiences gained from open reusable learning objects in health. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 1(4). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/2010-4
Downloads
Publiceret
Citation/Eksport
Nummer
Sektion
Licens
Artikler publiceret i Tidsskriftet for Læring og Medier er licenseret under en Creative Commons Navngivelse-IkkeKommerciel-IngenBearbejdelse 4.0 Unported Licens.
Forfattere bevarer deres ophavsret og giver tidsskriftet ret til første publicering, samtidigt med at værket er omfattet af Creative Commons Attribution-licensen: Navngivelse – Ikke-kommerciel - Ingen Bearbejdede Værker (by-nc-nd). Læs om licensen på http://www.creativecommons.dk/om/.
---
På LOM.dk kan du endvidere finde artikler fra det nu nedlagte Tidsskrift for Universiteternes Efter- og Videreuddannelse (UNEV). Vær opmærksom på, at der gælder særlige regler for UNEV artikler:
Det er forfatterne og evt. andre ophavsret indehavere, der har ophavsretten til artikler udgivet i UNEV regi, og det er en betingelse for adgang til artiklerne, at brugere anerkender og overholder de juridiske retningslinjer forbundet hermed.
- Brugere må downloade og printe én kopi af en hvilken som helst UNEV artikel mhp. private studier eller forskning.
- Det er ikke tilladt at videredistribuere artikler eller anvende disse til indtægtsdækkede aktiviteter eller kommercielle formål.
- Det er tilladt at distribuere URL’en til UNEV artikler.