Bias and leadership aspirations
Exploring the interaction of gender and parental status in self-evaluations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/kkf.v31i3.128967Nøgleord:
leadership aspirations, gender, parenthood, self-evaluations, biasResumé
This article aims to extend existing work on bias and leadership aspirations by investigating whether there are signifi cant differences in self-evaluations when jointly considering gender and parental status. With a data subset from a survey of 866 women and 1372 men who are members of the leading Danish union for managers and leaders, we examine the relationship of gender and parental status with leadership aspirations. Contra theory-based expectations, our exploratory study’s fi ndings show little difference between mothers and women without children, whereas fathers report signifi cantly higher leadership aspirations than men without children. Supplementary analysis indicates that lower aspirations are accompanied by lower self-evaluations of competence. Our fi ndings thus suggest that men and women are differentially affected by combined gender and parenthood biases and that gendered social expectations for parents affect self-evaluations even in a national context characterized by high levels of gender equality before the law.
Referencer
Abraham, M. 2020. Gender-role Incongruity and Audience-based Gender Bias: An Examination of Networking among Entrepreneurs. Administrative Science Quarterly. 65(1), 151–180.
Ashcraft, K. L. 2013. The glass slipper: Incorporating Occupational Identity in Management Studies. Academy of Management Review. 38(1), 6-31.
Barbulescu, R. and Bidwell, M. 2013. Do women choose different jobs from men? Mechanisms of application segregation in the market for managerial workers. Organization Science. 24(3), 737-756.
Bear, J. B., & Glick, P. 2017. Breadwinner Bonus and Caregiver Penalty in Workplace Rewards for Men and Women. Social Psychological and Personality Science. 8(7), 780–788.
Becker, J., Ayman, R. and Korabik, K. 2002. Discrepancies in Self/Subordinates' Perceptions of Leadership Behavior: Leader's Gender, Organizational Context, Leader's Self‐Monitoring. Group & Organization Management. 27(2), 226‐45.
Becker, S.O., Fernandes, A. and Weichselbaumer, D. (2019) Discrimination in hiring based on potential and realized fertility: Evidence from a large-scale field experiment, Labour Economics, 59, 139-152.
Benard, S., & Correll, S. J. 2010. Normative discrimination and the motherhood penalty. Gender and Society, 24(5), 616–646.
Berggren, C., & Lauster, N. (2014). The Motherhood Penalty and The Professional Credential: Inequality in Career Development for Those with Professional Degrees. International Studies in Sociology of Education. 24, 44–64.
Bierema, L. L. 2016. Women’s Leadership: Troubling Notions of the “Ideal” (Male) Leader. Advances in Developing Human Resources. 18(2), 119–136.
Bloksgaard, L. (2011). Masculinities, femininities and work – the horizontal gender. Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies. 1(2), 5-21.
Borchorst, A. and Siim, B. 2008. Woman-friendly Policies and State Feminism: Theorizing Scandinavian Gender Equality. Feminist Theory. 9(2), 207-224.
Borchorst, A., Freidenvall, L., Kantola, J., Reisel, L. and Teigen, M. 2012. Institutionalizing Intersectionality in the Nordic Countries: Anti–Discrimination and Equality in Denmark, Finland, Norway, and Sweden. In Krizsan, A., Skjeie, H and Squires, J. eds. Institutionalizing Intersectionality: The Changing Nature of European Equality Regimes. Basingstoke, UK & New York, NY USA: Palgrave Macmillan, 59-88
Burgess, N. 2013. The Motherhood Penalty: How Gender and Parental Status Influence Judgements of Job-Related Competence and Organizational Commitment. Seminar Research Paper Series. 32, 1–11.
Castilla, E.J. and Benard, S. 2010. The Paradox of Meritocracy in Organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly. 55(4), 543-676.
Cohen, J. 1992. A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155.
Collins, C. 2019. Making Motherhood Work: How Women Manage Careers and Caregiving. Princeton University Press. Princeton and Oxford
Correll S.J.; Benard S.; Paik I. 2007. Getting a job: is there a motherhood penalty? American Journal of Sociology. 112, 1297-1339
Cross, S.E. and Madson, L. 1997. Models of the self: self-construals and gender. Psychological bulletin. 122(1), 5-37
Doldor, E., Wyatt, M. and Silvester, J. 2019. Statesmen or Cheerleaders? Using Topic Modeling to Examine Gendered Messages in Narrative Developmental Feedback for Leaders. Leadership Quarterly. JAI. 30(5)
Eagly, A. H., & Carli, L. L. 2007. Women and the Labyrinth of Leadership. Harvard Business Review, 85(9), 63–71.
Eagly, A.H., and Steffen, V.J. 1984. Gender Stereotypes Stem from the Distribution of Women and Men into Social Roles." Journal of personality and social psychology, 46(4) 735.
European Commission 2012. Women in decision-making positions. Special Eurobarometer 376. Date: 20.20.2020. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/commfrontoffice/publicopinion/archives/ebs/ebs_376_en.pdf
Fritz, C. and van Knippenberg, D. 2018. Gender and leadership aspiration: The impact of work-life initiatives. Human Resource Management. 57(4), 855-868
Fuller, S., & Cooke, L. P. 2018. Workplace variation in fatherhood wage premiums: Do formalization and performance pay matter? Work, Employment and Society, 32(4), 768-788.
Goldin, C. 2014. A Grand Gender Convergence: Its Last Chapter. American Economic Review, 104(4), 1091–1119.
Gray, M. P., & O'Brien, K. M. (2007). Advancing the assessment of women's career choices: The Career Aspiration Scale. Journal of Career Assessment, 15(3), 317-337.
Heilman, M.E. 2001. Description and Prescription: How Gender Stereotypes prevent Women's Ascent up the Organizational Ladder. Journal of Social Issues. 57(4), 657-674.
Heilman, M.E. and Okimoto, T.G. 2008. Motherhood: a potential source of bias in employment decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology 93(1) 189.
Hodges, M.J. and Budig, M.J. 2010. Who gets the Daddy Bonus? Organizational Hegemonic Masculinity and the Impact of Fatherhood on Earnings. Gender and Society. 24(6), 717-745
Hoyland, T., Psychogios, A., Epitropaki, O., Damiani, J., Mukhuty, S., & Priestnall, C. 2021. A two-nation investigation of leadership self-perceptions and motivation to lead in early adulthood: the moderating role of gender and socio-economic status. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 42(2), 289–315.
Hoyt, C.L. and Murphy, S.E. 2016. Managing to Clear the Air: Stereotype Threat, Women, and Leadership. The Leadership Quarterly. 27(3), 387-399.
Hoyt, C. L., Johnson, S. K., Murphy, S. E., and Skinnell, K. H. (2010). The Impact of Blatant Stereotype Activation and Group Sex-Composition on Female Leaders. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(5) 716–732.
Hughes, A., Galbraith, D. and White, D. 2011. Perceived Competence: A Common Core for Self-Efficacy and Self-Concept? Journal of Personality Assessment. 93(3), 278-289.
Isaac, C., Lee, B. and Carnes, M. 2009. Interventions that Affect Gender Bias in Hiring: A Systematic Review. Academic Medicine: Journal of The Association of American Medical Colleges. 84(10), 1440.
Just, S. N., and Remke, R. V. 2019. Nurturing Bodies: Exploring Discourses of Parental Leave as Communicative Practices of Affective Embodiment. In Fotaki M. and Pullen, A. Eds., Diversity, Affect and Embodiment in Organizing. Cham: Springer, 47–67.
Jørgensen, T.M. 2009. Arbejdsmarkedspolitik. 8. udgave, Handelshøjskolens Forlag, 68.
Kleven, H., Landais, C., and Søgaard, J.E. 2019. Children and Gender Inequality: Evidence from Denmark. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics. 11(4), 181-209.
Koenig, A. M., Eagly, A. H., Mitchell, A. A., & Ristikari, T. 2011. Are Leader Stereotypes Masculine? A Meta-Analysis of Three Research Paradigms. Psychological Bulletin. 137
Kossek, E. E., Su, R. and Wu, L. 2016. “Opting Out” or “Pushed Out”? Integrating Perspectives on Women’s Career Equality for Gender Inclusion and Interventions. Journal of Management. 43(1), 228–254.
Kmec, J. A. 2011. Are motherhood penalties and fatherhood bonuses warranted? Comparing pro-work behaviors and conditions of mothers, fathers, and non-parents. Social Science Research, 40(2), 444–459.
Ladge, J. J., Humberd, B. K., Baskerville Watkins, M., & Harrington, B. 2015. Updating the Organization MAN: An Examination of Involved Fathering in the Workplace. Academy of Management Perspectives, 29(1), 152–171.
Lederne: Om interesseorganisation. Information on the union Date: 21.08.2020. Retrieved from https://www.lederne.dk/om-lederne
McGinn, K.L., and Milkman, K.L. 2013. Looking up and Looking out: Career Mobility Effects of Demographic Similarity Among Professionals. Organization Science. 24(4), 1041-1060.
Meriläinen, S., Tienari, J. and Valtonen, A. 2015. Headhunters and the “ideal” executive body’, Organization. Sage: London, England. 22(1), 3–22.
Morgenroth, T., Ryan, M. K., & Sønderlund, A. L. 2021. Think Manager–Think Parent? Investigating the fatherhood advantage and the motherhood penalty using the Think Manager–Think Male paradigm. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 51(3), 237–247.
Nordisk statistik 2017. Red: Klaus Munch Haagensen, Danmarks Statistik, Ulla Agerskov, Nordiska ministerådet. Databas: Troels A. Vestergaard, Danmarks Statistik. Nordiska ministerrådet 2017. Tryck: Specialtrykkeriet Arco, Denmark. Date: 20.20.2020. Retrieved from: http://norden.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1146907/FULLTEXT04.pdf
Morgenroth, T., Ryan, M.K., Rink, F., and Begeny, C. 2020. The (in)compatibility of Identities: Understanding Gender Differences in Work-Life Conflict Through the Fit with Leaders. British Journal of Psychology.
Okimoto, T. G., & Brescoll, V. L. 2010. The Price of Power: Power Seeking and Backlash against Female Politicians. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 36(7), 923-936.
O'Toole, J.C. and D'aoust, V. 2000. Fit for Motherhood: Towards a Recognition of Multiplicity in Disabled Lesbian Mothers. Disability Studies Quarterly. 20(2),145-154
Ottsen, C.L. 2018. Diversity research from a historical perspective: Context, cognition and career choices. In Willumsen, T.A. (Ed), Womenomics – Gender Diversity and the Rise of Female-Driven Growth Potential. Above & Beyond Publishing.
Ottsen, C.L. 2019. Lucky to reach the Top? Gendered Perspectives on Leadership Acquisition across Qatar and Denmark. Gender in Management. 34(7), 541-553.
Padavic, I., Ely, R. J. and Reid, E. M. 2020. Explaining the Persistence of Gender Inequality: The Work-family Narrative as a Social Defense against the 24/7 Work Culture. Administrative Science Quarterly. 65(1), 61–111.
Peters, K., Ryan, M. K., Haslam, S. A., and Fernandes, H. 2012. To Belong or Not to Belong: Evidence that Women’s Occupational Disidentification is Promoted by Lack of Fit with Masculine Occupational Prototypes. Journal of Personnel Psychology. 3, 148-158.
Peters, K., Haslam, S. A., & Ryan, M. K. 2015. Marines, Medics and Machismo: A Lack of Fit with Masculine Occupational Stereotypes discourages Men's Participation. British Journal of Psychology. 4, 635-655.
Reid, E. M. 2015. Embracing, Passing, Revealing, and the Ideal Worker Image: How People Navigate Expected and Experienced Professional Identities. Organization Science. 26, 997–1017
Rhode, D. L. (2017). Women and leadership. Oxford University Press. New York
Rudman, L. A. and Glick, P. 2001. Prescriptive Gender Stereotypes and Backlash Toward Agentic Women. Journal of Social Issues. 57(4), 743-762
Rudman, L.A. and Mescher, K. 2013. Penalizing men who Request a Family Leave: Is Flexibility Stigma a Femininity Stigma? Journal of Social Issues. 69(2), 322-340.
Sánchez, C. M., & Lehnert, K. 2019. The unbearable heaviness of leadership: The effects of competency, negatives, and experience on women’s aspirations to leadership. Journal of Business Research, 95, 182–194.
Spencer S.J., Logel, C. and Davies, P.G. 2016. Stereotype Threat. Annual Review of Psychology. 67, 415-437. https://DOI:10.1146/annurev-psych-073115-103235
Steffens, N.K.; Fonseca, M.A.; Ryan, M.K.; Rink, F.A.; Stoker, J.I.; Pieterse, A.N. 2018. How Feedback about Leadership Potential impacts Ambition, Affective Organizational Commitment, and Performance. Leadership Quarterly. 29, 637–647.
Steinpreis, R.E., Anders, K.A. and Ritzke, D. 1999. The Impact of Gender on the Review of the Curricula Vitae of Job Applicants and Tenure Candidates: A National Empirical Study. Sex Roles. 41(7-8), 509-528.
Sønderlund, A.L., Morton, T.A., Ryan, M.K. 2017. Multiple Group Membership and Well-Being: Is There Always Strength in Numbers? Frontiers in Psychology. 8, 1038.
Thébaud, S., & Taylor, C. J. 2021. The Specter of Motherhood: Culture and the Production of Gendered Career Aspirations in Science and Engineering. Gender & Society, 089124322110060.
Watts, J. H. 2009. Leaders of Men: Women ‘Managing’ in Construction. Work, Employment and Society. 23(3) 512–530.
Wilton, L. S., Sanchez, D. T., Unzueta, M. M., Kaiser, C., and Caluori, N. 2019. Good company: When gender diversity boosts a Company's reputation. Psychology of Women Quarterly. 43(1), 59–72.
Wood, W. and Eagly, A.H. 2002. A Cross-Cultural Analysis of The Behavior of Women and Men: Implications for the Origins of Sex Differences. Psychological Bulletin. 128(5), 699.
World Economic Forum (2020, November 16). Global Gender Gap Report. Date: 20.20.2020. Retrieved from: https://www.weforum.org/reports/gender-gap-2020-report-100-years-pay-equality
Downloads
Publiceret
Citation/Eksport
Nummer
Sektion
Licens
Copyright (c) 2021 Florence Villesèche, Christina Ottsen, Minna Paunova
Dette værk er under følgende licens Creative Commons Navngivelse –Ikke-kommerciel (by-nc).
Udgivelser i Kvinder, Køn og Forskning er beskyttet under Creative Commons License: CC Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0
