Vol. 21 No. 39 (2023): Patient Reported Outcomes
Introduktionsartikler

Deltagelse med data? Patientrapporterede oplysninger og patientdeltagelse i det danske, dataintensive sundhedsvæsen

PDF (Dansk)
  • Henriette Langstrup,
  • Jeppe Eriksen,
  • Marie Louise Tørring,
  • Claus Bossen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7146/tfss.v21i39.142188

Published 2023-12-07

How to Cite

Langstrup, H., Eriksen, J., Tørring, M. L., & Bossen, C. (2023). Deltagelse med data? Patientrapporterede oplysninger og patientdeltagelse i det danske, dataintensive sundhedsvæsen. Tidsskrift for Forskning I Sygdom Og Samfund - Journal of Research in Sickness and Society, 21(39). https://doi.org/10.7146/tfss.v21i39.142188
Copyright Notice

Abstract

At det er vigtigt for sundhedsvæsenet og for den enkelte behandler at vide, hvordan patienten har det, og hvilke problemer patienten oplever, er næppe en overraskelse for nogen. Det er jo blandt andet en af grundene til, at patienter og læger mødes ansigt til ansigt i konsultationen. Hvad der måske er mere overraskende er, hvor stor en praktisk udfordring det er for sundhedssystemet at indsamle patienternes oplevelser og inddrage deres behov og vurdering af egen sundhedstilstand i såvel kliniske som administrative beslutninger. For hvordan får man på systematisk og relevant vis viden om, hvad der betyder noget for den enkelte patient i et sundhedssystem, der er presset af personalemangel, stram økonomi og stigende forventninger? 

PDF (Dansk)

References

  1. Anderson, R.M., Funnell, M.M., 2010. Patient Empowerment: Myths and Misconceptions.
  2. Patient Educ Couns 79, 277. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PEC.2009.07.025
  3. Arnstein, S.R., 1969. A Ladder of Citizen Participation. Journal of the American Planning
  4. Association 35, 216–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366908977225
  5. Aujoulat, I., d’Hoore, W., Deccache, A., 2007. Patient empowerment in theory and practice:
  6. polysemy or cacophony? Patient Educ Couns 66, 13–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.
  7. PEC.2006.09.008
  8. Beedholm, K., Jensen, A.-L., Frederiksen, K., 2019. Patientinddragelse og politisk styring,
  9. in: Jørgensen, K. (Ed.), Patientinddragelse: politik, profession og bruger. Samfundslitteratur,
  10. Frederiksberg, pp. 24–45.
  11. Black, N., 2013. Patient reported outcome measures could help transform healthcare. BMJ
  12. https://doi.org/10.1136/BMJ.F167
  13. Bossen, C., Pine, K.H., Cabitza, F., Ellingsen, G., Piras, E.M., 2019. Data work in healthcare: An
  14. Introduction. Health Informatics J 25, 465–474. https://doi.org/10.1177/1460458219864730
  15. Bowker, G.C., Star, S.L., 1999. Sorting things out: classification and its consequences, Inside
  16. technology. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
  17. Bravo, P., Edwards, A., Barr, P.J., Scholl, I., Elwyn, G., McAllister, M., 2015. Conceptualising
  18. patient empowerment: A mixed methods study. BMC Health Serv Res 15, 1–14. https://
  19. doi.org/10.1186/S12913-015-0907-Z/TABLES/4
  20. Castro, E.M., Van Regenmortel, T., Vanhaecht, K., Sermeus, W., Van Hecke, A., 2016. Patient
  21. empowerment, patient participation and patient-centeredness in hospital care: A concept
  22. analysis based on a literature review. Patient Educ Couns 99, 1923–1939. https://doi.
  23. org/10.1016/J.PEC.2016.07.026
  24. Chen, J., Ou, L., Hollis, S.J., 2013. A systematic review of the impact of routine collection of
  25. patient reported outcome measures on patients, providers and health organisations in
  26. an oncologic setting. BMC Health Serv Res 13, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-13-
  27. /TABLES/6
  28. Danske Regioner, 2016. National arbejdsgruppe til understøttelse af Patient Rapporterede
  29. Oplysninger (PRO), Forståelsespapir. Sundheds- og Ældreministeriet, Danmark.
  30. Egholm, C., Jensen, S., Wandel, A., Hørder, M., 2023. The implementation of the 2017 national
  31. policy on patient-reported outcomes in Denmark: An overview of developments
  32. Tidsskrift for Forskning i Sygdom og Samfund, nr. 39, 5-22
  33. after six years. Health Policy (New York) 130, 104755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.
  34. 104755
  35. Eldh, A., 2006. Patient participation: what it is and what it is not. Örebro Universitetsbibliotek,
  36. Örebro.
  37. Ellwood, P.M., 2010. Outcomes Management. http://dx.doi.org.ez.statsbiblioteket.dk/10.1056/
  38. NEJM198806093182329 318, 1549–1556. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM198806093182329
  39. Eriksen, J., 2021. Purpose, Functionality and Reconceptualisation of Patient-Reported Outcome:
  40. a patient participation perspective on pro in clinical practice post its digitalisation.
  41. https://doi.org/10.54337/AAU461776857
  42. Eriksen, J., Bygholm, A., Bertelsen, P., 2022a. The association between patient-reported outcomes
  43. (PROs) and patient participation in chronic care: A scoping review. Patient Educ
  44. Couns 105, 1852–1864. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PEC.2022.01.008
  45. Eriksen, J., Bygholm, A., Bertelsen, P., 2020. The Purpose of Patient-Reported Outcome
  46. (PRO) Post Its Digitalization and Integration into Clinical Practice: An Interdisciplinary
  47. Redefinition Resembling PROs Theoretical and Practical Evolvement. Applied
  48. Sciences 2020, Vol. 10, Page 7507 10, 7507. https://doi.org/10.3390/APP10217507
  49. Eriksen, J., Eriksen, K., Bertelsen, P.S., 2022b. Citizens’ use of Health Information Technology
  50. between 2013-2021 in Denmark: A longitudinal study, in: Proceedings of the 18th
  51. Scandinavian Conference on Health Informatics | Scandinavian Conference on Health
  52. Informatics. pp. 128–135.
  53. Greenhalgh, J., 2009. The applications of PROs in clinical practice: what are they, do they
  54. work, and why? Qual Life Res 18, 115–123. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11136-008-9430-6
  55. Hjollund, N.H.I., 2019. Fifteen years’ use of patient-reported outcome measures at the
  56. group and patient levels: Trend analysis. J Med Internet Res 21, e15856. https://doi.
  57. org/10.2196/15856
  58. Horgan, D., Hajduch, M., Vrana, M., Soderberg, J., Hughes, N., Omar, M.I., Lal, J.A., Kozaric,
  59. M., Cascini, F., Thaler, V., Solà-Morales, O., Romão, M., Destrebecq, F., Sky Gross,
  60. E., 2022. European Health Data Space-An Opportunity Now to Grasp the Future of
  61. Data-Driven Healthcare. Healthcare (Basel) 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/HEALTHCARE10091629
  62. Howell, D., Molloy, S., Wilkinson, K., Green, E., Orchard, K., Wang, K., Liberty, J., 2015.
  63. Patient-reported outcomes in routine cancer clinical practice: a scoping review of use,
  64. impact on health outcomes, and implementation factors. Ann Oncol 26, 1846–1858. https://
  65. doi.org/10.1093/ANNONC/MDV181
  66. Høyer, K., 2023. Data Paradoxes. The politics of Intensified Data Sourcing in Healthcare, 1st
  67. ed. MIT Press, Cambridge.
  68. Høyer, K., 2019. Hvem skal bruge sundhedsdata - og til hvad? 1. udgave. ed, Moderne ideer;
  69. no 14. Information, Kbh.
  70. Jasanoff, S., Kim, S.H., 2013. Sociotechnical Imaginaries and National Energy Policies. Sci
  71. Cult (Lond) 22, 189–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/09505431.2013.786990/ASSET//CMS/ASSET/
  72. A7876852-F4B9-4C9B-BB45-2EB3ADDDB21D/09505431.2013.786990.FP.PNG
  73. Jensen, C.B., 2010. Ontologies for developing things: making health care futures through
  74. technology, Transdisciplinary studies; v. 3. Sense Publishers, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  75. Jensen, S., 2023. Minister bebuder AI-offensiv: Skal afbøde mangel på varme hænder. Berlingske
  76. Tidende.
  77. Introduktion 21
  78. John Appleby, N.D., 2015. Using Patient Reported Outcomes to Improve Health Care, 1st
  79. ed. Wiley, Newark.
  80. Kickbusch, I., 2020. The dark side of digital health. The BMJ Opinion.
  81. Kommunernes Landsforening, 2023. Kommunal PRO [WWW Document]. URL https://
  82. kommunalpro.kk.dk/ (accessed 10.31.23).
  83. Kotronoulas, G., Kearney, N., Maguire, R., Harrow, A., Di Domenico, D., Croy, S., MacGillivray,
  84. S., 2014. What is the value of the routine use of patient-reported outcome measures
  85. toward improvement of patient outcomes, processes of care, and health service
  86. outcomes in cancer care? A systematic review of controlled trials. J Clin Oncol 32, 1480–
  87. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2013.53.5948
  88. Langstrup, H., 2019. Patient-reported data and the politics of meaningful data work. Health
  89. Informatics J 25, 567–576. https://doi.org/10.1177/1460458218820188
  90. Langstrup, H., Moreira, T., 2022. Infrastructuring experience: what matters in patientreported
  91. outcome data measurement? Biosocieties 17, 369–390. https://doi.org/10.1057/
  92. S41292-020-00221-5
  93. Latour, B., 1993. We have never been modern. Harvester Wheatsheaf, New York.
  94. Petrakaki, D., Hilberg, E., Waring, J., 2021. The Cultivation of Digital Health Citizenship.
  95. Soc Sci Med 270, 113675. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SOCSCIMED.2021.113675
  96. Porter, M.E., 2010. What Is Value in Health Care? New England Journal of Medicine 363,
  97. –2481. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMP1011024)
  98. Powell, J., Newhouse, N., Boylan, A.-M., Williams, V., 2016. Digital health citizens and the future
  99. of the NHS. Digit Health 2, 205520761667203. https://doi.org/10.1177/2055207616672033
  100. Prainsack, B., Ciechanover, A.J., 2022. The advent of automated medicine? The values and
  101. meanings of precision, in: Barilan, Y.M., Brusa, M., Ciechanover, A.J. (Eds.), Can Precision
  102. Medicine Be Personal, Can Personalized Medicine Be Precise? Oxford University
  103. Press, Oxford, England, pp. 203–216.
  104. PRO Sekretariatet, 2017. Det nationale arbejde med PRO.
  105. Regeringen, Danske Regioner, 2016. Aftale om regionernes økonomi for 2017.
  106. Region Hovedstaden, 2022. Fra aktivitetsstyring til værdibaseret styring og nærhedsfinansiering
  107. [WWW Document]. URL https://www.regionh.dk/til-fagfolk/Om-Region-
  108. H/oekonomi/FAQ-om-oekonomi/Sider/Fra-aktivitetsstyring-til-vaerdibaseret-styring.
  109. aspx (accessed 11.1.23).
  110. Region Midtjylland, 2023. AmbuFlex, Center for PRO [WWW Document]. URL https://
  111. www.fagperson.sundhed.rm.dk/til-ansatte-og-samarbejdspartnere/ambuflex/ (accessed
  112. 31.23).
  113. Star, S., 2010. This is Not a Boundary Object: Reflections on the Origin of a Concept on JSTOR.
  114. Sci Technol Human Values 35, 601–617.
  115. Torenholt, R., Langstrup, H., 2023. Between a logic of disruption and a logic of continuation:
  116. Negotiating the legitimacy of algorithms used in automated clinical decisionmaking.
  117. Health N Hav 27, 41–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363459321996741
  118. Torenholt, R., Saltbæk, L., Langstrup, H., 2020. Patient data work: filtering and sensing
  119. patient-reported outcomes. Sociol Health Illn 42, 1379–1393. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-
  120. 13114
  121. Tørring, M.L., 2015. Overbevisning smitter. Feltraportage fra et Cancerregister. Jorden Folk
  122. , 60–69.
  123. Tidsskrift for Forskning i Sygdom og Samfund, nr. 39, 5-22
  124. Trisha Greenhalgh, C.H., 2011. User Involvement in Health Care, 1st ed. Wiley, Newark.
  125. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444325164
  126. ViBIS, 2016. Program PRO. Anvendelse af PRO-data i kvalitetsudviklingen af det danske
  127. sundhedsvæsen -anbefalinger og vidensgrundlag. København.
  128. VIBIS, 2013. Sundhedsprofessionelles forståelser af patientinddragelse. En kvalitativ undersøgelse.
  129. Wachter, R.M., 2015. The digital doctor: hope, hype, and harm at the dawn of medicine’s
  130. computer age. McGraw-Hill Education, New York.