Vol. 23 No. 41 (2024): Care Under Change 2: The Relations of Care
Originalartikler

Together in care and illness. Everyday life for elderly couples where both are ill.

Gitte Wind
Bio

Published 2024-12-03

Keywords

  • Spouses,
  • Everyday life,
  • Health and illness,
  • informal care,
  • welfare state,
  • older people
  • ...More
    Less

How to Cite

Vedsegaard, & Wind, G. (2024). Together in care and illness. Everyday life for elderly couples where both are ill . Tidsskrift for Forskning I Sygdom Og Samfund - Journal of Research in Sickness and Society, 23(41). https://doi.org/10.7146/tfss.v23i41.141378

Abstract

Older cohabiting couples where both spouses are ill are also each other's caregiver. In this article, we will examine how everyday life with care and illness unfolds among older married couples who, to varying degrees, receive district nursing care. Based on this, we will discuss and challenge the traditional dichotomous understanding of the roles of patient versus caregiver that arises in the encounter with the welfare state. The article is based on eight semi-structured in-depth interviews with five cohabiting older married couples. Based on the couple Doris and Jens, and incorporating the experiences of the other four couples, the article explores how the couples share care and illness in different ways. The themes of the analysis: when care primarily goes one way; in the 'two-someness' of care and illness; and cracks of light in everyday life with illness show that the welfare state is an essential condition and actor for how the married couples are together on care and illness. It is also clear that the married couples in their encounter with the welfare state's health professionals are framed in the roles of patient and caregiver in a dichotomous understanding, which we challenge in this article, as both spouses are ill and are each other's caregiver. This dissolves the dichotomy between patient and caregiver and highlights how care flows differently between the two ill spouses. This has implications for the encounter between the elderly couple and the healthcare system and for the expectations of the person categorized as the caregiver.

References

  1. Andersen, J. (2022). Sundhedsøkonom: Ældreplejen skal være mere 'sydlandsk'. DR https://www.dr.dk/nyheder/politik/folketingsvalg/sundhedsoekonom-aeldreplejen-skal-vaere-mere-sydlandsk. [Besøgt 20.10.23]
  2. Antonelli, M.T., Grace, P. J., & Boltz, M. (2020). Mutual caregiving: Living meaningfully as an older couple. International Journal of Older People Nursing, 15(4), e12340–n/a. https://doi.org/10.1111/opn.12340
  3. Danske Patienter, (2022). Hvad har pårørende krav på? www.danskepatienter.dk [Besøgt 20.10.23]
  4. Forfatter 2008
  5. Forfatter 2019
  6. Gant, V. (2010). Older Carers and Adults with Learning Disabilities: Stress and Reciprocal Care. Mental Health and Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 7 (2), 159-172. http://dx.doi.org/10.5920/mhldrp.2010.72159
  7. Helse- og omsorgsdepartementet, (2020). Vi – de pårørende. Regjeringens pårørendestrategi og handlingsplan. Norge. https://www.regjeringen.no/contentassets/08948819b8244ec893d90a66deb1aa4a/vi-de-parorende.pdf [Besøgt 20.10.23]
  8. Ekström, H., Auoja, N.L., Elmståhl, S., & Sandin Wranker, L. (2020). High Burden among Older Family Caregivers is Associated with High Prevalence of Symptoms: Data from the Swedish Study "Good Aging in Skåne (GÅS)". Journal of Aging Research, 5272130. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/5272130
  9. Eriksson, E., Wejåker, M., Danhard, A., Nilsson, A., & Kristofferzon ML. (2019). Living with a spouse with chronic illness – the challenge of balancing demands and resources. BMC Public Health, 19, 422 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-6800-7
  10. Indenrigs- og sundhedsministeriet, (2023). Bekendtgørelse af sundhedsloven, LBK nr. 1011 af 17/06/2023. https://www.retsinformation.dk/eli/lta/2023/1011 [Besøgt 20.10.23]
  11. KL (2017) Analysenotat: Udvikling i indlæggelsesvarighed for somatiske indlæggelser. https://www.kl.dk/media/18575/udvikling-i-indlaeggelsesvarighed-for-somatiske-indlaeggelser.pdf [Besøgt 20.10.23]
  12. Kure, J. (2018). Pårørende – budskaber, barrierer og løsninger En rundspørge blandt patient- og pårørendeforeninger. Danske Patienter
  13. Mol, A., Moser, I., & Pols, J. (2010). Care in Practice. On Tinkering in Clinics, Homes and farms. Bielefeld: transcript Verlag
  14. Møller, J.J.K., Dieperink, K., Rottmann, N., & Mikkelsen, T.B. (2020). Pårørendestøtte. Kortlægning af støtte til pårørende til borgere/patienter med fem udvalgte livstruende sygdomme i kommuner og på hospitaler. REHPA
  15. Navne, L.E., & Wiuff, M.B. (2011) Opgavefordeling mellem borgere, pårørende og fagpersoner i rehabilitering. Dansk Sundhedsinstitut
  16. Oute, J., & Glasdam, S. (2022). Opgaveglidning og ansvarsforskydning i konkurrencestaten – et etnografisk studie af inddragelse og ansvarliggørelse af pårørende i psykiatriskpraksis. I H.Vike, B. Karlsson, & R. Sundet (Red.) Velferdsstatens transformasjoner (pp. 256–276). Fagbokforlaget. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55669/oa200911
  17. Pedersen, M.H., & Larsen F.B. (2022). Multisygdom i den danske befolkning – forekomsten af multisygdomsmønstre og sammenhængen med sociodemografiske faktorer og helbredsrelateret livskvalitet. Aarhus: DEFACTUM, Region Midtjylland.
  18. Plöthner, M., Schmidt, K., de Jong, L., Zeidler, J., & Damm, K. (2019). Needs and preferences of informal caregivers regarding outpatient care for the elderly: a systematic literature review. BMC Geriatrics, 19, 82 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-019-1068-4
  19. Schwartz, J. (2004). ENQUETE: Pårørende. Tidsskriftet Antropologi, 50 https://doi.org/10.7146/ta.v0i50.106935
  20. Socialdepartementet. (2022). Nationell anhörigstrategi - inom hälso- och sjukvård och omsorg. Sverige. https://www.regeringen.se/rattsliga-dokument/departementsserien-och-promemorior/2022/04/nationell-anhorigstrategi---inom-halso--och-sjukvard-och-omsorg/ [Besøgt 20.10.23]
  21. Social-, bolig- og ældreministeriet. Bekendtgørelse af lov om social service, LBK nr. 1089 af 16/08/2023 § 83, §84. https://www.retsinformation.dk/eli/lta/2023/1089 [Besøgt 20.10.23]
  22. Stie, M., Pedersen, AL., Koustrup, P., Winther, B., Hoeck, B., & Delmar, C. (2020). Ansvarlige, men i anden række – en kritisk diskursanalyse af pårørendeinddragelse. Nordisk sygeplejeforskning, 10(3), 185-200 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.1892-2686-2020-03-05
  23. Sundhedsstyrelsen (2023). Det gode samarbejde med pårørende i ældreplejen. https://sst.dk/da/vaerdighed/temaer/paaroerende/haandbog-om-det-gode-samarbejde-med-paaroerende [Besøgt 20.10.23]
  24. Torgé, C.J. (2014). Freedom and imperative: mutual care between older spouses with physical disabilities. Journal of Family Nursing, 20(2), 204–225. https://doi.org/10.1177/1074840714524058
  25. Tran, V.T., Barnes, C., Montori, V.M., Falissard, B., & Ravaud, F. (2015). Taxonomy of the burden of treatment: a multi-country web-based qualitative study of patients with chronic conditions. BMC Medicine 13, 115 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-015-0356-x
  26. Tronto, J.C. (1993) Moral Boundaries. A political argument for an ethic of care. New York/London: Routledge.
  27. Tronto, J. C. (1998). An Ethic of Care. Generations: Journal of the American Society on Aging, 22(3), 15–20. http://www.jstor.org/stable/44875693
  28. Unece (2019). The challenging roles of informal carers. UNECE Policy Brief on Ageing No. 22.
  29. Worthington A., Rooney P., & Hannan R. (2013). The Triangle of Care. Carers Trust https://www.bdct.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Triangle-of-Care-Intro-PDF.pdf [Besøgt 20.10.23]