Vol. 22 No. 40 (2024): Care Under Change 1
Originalartikler

The Changing Roles of GPS-Tracking in Dementia Care

Astrid Meyer
Aarhus Universitet

Published 2024-06-25

Keywords

  • demens,
  • overvågning,
  • velfærdsteknologi,
  • pårørendeperspektiv

How to Cite

Meyer, A. (2024). The Changing Roles of GPS-Tracking in Dementia Care. Tidsskrift for Forskning I Sygdom Og Samfund - Journal of Research in Sickness and Society, 22(40). https://doi.org/10.7146/tfss.v22i40.136522

Abstract

Global Positioning System (GPS)-tracking is increasingly used to prevent and manage wandering in Danish dementia care. In this article, I follow the first-hand experiences of a woman using GPS-tracking to care for her husband with Alzheimer's at home and after he moves into a nursing home. In doing so, I trace how the GPS-tracker plays many different roles as it is used for different purposes. To conceptualise these changes, I draw on the idea of care arrangements (López Gómez, 2015; Thygesen & Moser, 2010), and understand GPS-tracking as being a part of ever-changing constellations of heterogeneous elements allowing for particular possibilities and restraints in care.

I show how GPS-tracking is a dynamic technology, able to change along with care arrangements. Making GPS-tracking change role does, however, also add tensions and new expectations, which means it not only is shaped by care arrangements but also shapes them. Based on this co-shaping, I argue that GPS-tracking is a 'sticky' technology that clings to the care arrangement. The idea of 'stickiness' is furthermore supported by the way GPS-tracking makes itself seem necessary as it articulates risks in particular ways. By drawing on Buch's notion of care as generative labour (2018), I point to how GPS-tracking produces new responsibilities, which require alert carers. In exploring these tensions and changing roles I aim to add nuance to the use of GPS-tracking and how this technology both can cause and indicate broader changes in dementia care.

References

  1. Agrawal, A. K., Gowda, M., Achary, U., Gowda, G. S., et al. (2021). Approach to Management of Wandering in Dementia: Ethical and Legal Issue. Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine, 43(5_suppl), S53–S59. SAGE Publications India. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1177/02537176211030979
  2. Akrich, M. (1992). The De-scription of Technical Objects. In W. Bijker & J. Law (Eds.), Shaping Technology- Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change (pp. 205–224). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  3. Akrich, M., & Latour, B. (1992). A Summary of a Convenient Vocabulary for the Semiotics of Human and Nonhuman Assemblies. Bijker, W.E., Law, J.
  4. Algase, D. L., Moore, D. H., Vandeweerd, C., & Gavin-Dreschnack, D. J. (2007). Mapping the maze of terms and definitions in dementia-related wandering. Aging & Mental Health, 11(6), 686–698. Routledge. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/13607860701366434
  5. Bartlett, R., Brannelly, T., & Topo, P. (2019). Using GPS Technologies with People with Dementia: A Synthesising Review and Recommendations for Future Practice. Tidsskrift for omsorgsforskning, 5(3), 84–98. Retrieved from http://www.idunn.no/doi/10.18261/issn.2387-5984-2019-03-08
  6. Brittain, K., Degnen, C., Gibson, G., Dickinson, C., et al. (2017). When walking becomes wandering: representing the fear of the fourth age. Sociology of Health & Illness, 39(2), 270–284. Retrieved from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-9566.12505
  7. Buch, E. D. (2018). Inequalities of Aging Paradoxes of Independence in American Home Care. New York, NY: New York University Press.
  8. Ceci, C., Moser, I., & Pols, J. (2020). The Shifting Arrangements We Call Home. In B. Pasveer, O. Synnes, & I. Moser (Eds.), Ways of Home Making in Care for Later Life (pp. 293–312). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0406-8_14
  9. Cipriani, G., Lucetti, C., Nuti, A., & Danti, S. (2014). Wandering and dementia: Wandering. Psychogeriatrics, 14(2), 135–142. Retrieved from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/psyg.12044
  10. Dewing, J. (2007). Participatory research: A method for process consent with persons who have dementia. Dementia, 6(1), 11–25. Retrieved from http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1471301207075625
  11. Driessen, A. (2018). Sociomaterial Will-Work: Aligning Daily Wanting in Dutch Dementia Care. In F. Krause & J. Boldt (Eds.), Care in Healthcare: Reflections on Theory and Practice (pp. 111–133). Cham: Springer International Publishing. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61291-1_7
  12. Felding, S. A., & Schwennesen, N. (2019). En analyse af den konfliktfyldte omsorgstrojka mellem mennesker med demens, pårørende og plejepersonale på et plejehjem i Danmark. Tidsskrift for Forskning i Sygdom og Samfund, 30, 123–149.
  13. Glavind, I. M. L., & Mogensen, H. O. (2022). Fragile storytelling: Methodological considerations when conducting ethnographic fieldwork among people with Alzheimer’s disease. SSM - Qualitative Research in Health, 2, 100103. Retrieved from https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2667321522000658
  14. Grosen, S. L., & Hansen, A. M. (2021). Sensor-floors: Changing Work and Values in Care for Frail Older Persons. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 46(2), 254–274. Retrieved from http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0162243920911959
  15. Ienca, M., Jotterand, F., Vică, C., & Elger, B. (2016). Social and Assistive Robotics in Dementia Care: Ethical Recommendations for Research and Practice. International Journal of Social Robotics, 8(4), 565–573. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12369-016-0366-7
  16. Kommunernes Landsforening. (2023). Fælles erklæring om velfærdsteknologi. https://videncenter.kl.dk/media/27695/kl_faelles-erklaering-om-velfaerdsteknologi.pdf, Accessed 12.03.2023.
  17. López Gómez, D. (2015). Little arrangements that matter. Rethinking autonomy-enabling innovations for later life. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 93, 91–101. Retrieved from https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0040162514000791
  18. Ministry of Social Affairs, Housing and Senior Citizens. (2022, January 6). Bekendtgørelse om tryghedsskabende velfærdsteknologiske løsninger i relation til afsnit VII i lov om social service. Retrieved from https://www.retsinformation.dk/eli/lta/2022/13
  19. Mol, A. (2008). The Logic of Care. Oxon: Routledge.
  20. Mol, A., Moser, I., & Pols, J. (Eds). (2010). Care in Practice: On Tinkering in Clinics, Homes and Farms. transcript Verlag. Retrieved from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.14361/transcript.9783839414477/html
  21. Neubauer, N. A., Azad-Khaneghah, P., Miguel-Cruz, A., & Liu, L. (2018). What do we know about strategies to manage dementia-related wandering? A scoping review. Alzheimer’s & Dementia : Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring, 10, 615–628. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6234917/
  22. Niemeijer, A. R., Depla, M. F., Frederiks, B. J., & Hertogh, C. M. (2015). The experiences of people with dementia and intellectual disabilities with surveillance technologies in residential care. Nursing Ethics, 22(3), 307–320. Retrieved from http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0969733014533237
  23. Niemeijer, A. R., Depla, M., Frederiks, B., Francke, A. L., et al. (2014). The Use of Surveillance Technology in Residential Facilities for People with Dementia or Intellectual Disabilities: A Study Among Nurses and Support Staff. The American Journal of Nursing, 114(12), 28–38. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org.ez.statsbiblioteket.dk/stable/24466736
  24. Niemeijer, A. R., Frederiks, B. J. M., Riphagen, I. I., Legemaate, J., et al. (2010). Ethical and practical concerns of surveillance technologies in residential care for people with dementia or intellectual disabilities: an overview of the literature. International Psychogeriatrics, 22(7), 1129–1142. Retrieved from https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1041610210000037/type/journal_article
  25. Oudshoorn, N., & Pinch, Trevor. (2005). How users matter : the co-construction of users and technology. Inside technology. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
  26. Peine, A., & Neven, L. (2021). The co-constitution of ageing and technology – a model and agenda. Ageing and Society, 41(12), 2845–2866. Retrieved from https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0144686X20000641/type/journal_article
  27. Pols, J. (2005). Enacting Appreciations: Beyond the Patient Perspective. Health Care Analysis, 13(3), 203–221. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10728-005-6448-6
  28. Pols, J., & Willems, D. (2011). Innovation and evaluation: taming and unleashing telecare technology. Sociology of health & illness, 33(3), 484–498.
  29. Stella Care. (2023, February 5). The best GPS devices for people with Dementia. https://stellacare.dk/en/, Accessed 23.02.2023.
  30. Thygesen, H., & Moser, I. (2010). Technology and Good Dementia Care: An Argument for an Ethics-in-Practice Approach. New Technologies and Emerging Spaces of Care. Surrey: Ashgate.
  31. Vermeer, Y., Higgs, P., & Charlesworth, G. (2019). What do we require from surveillance technology? A review of the needs of people with dementia and informal caregivers. Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering, 6, 205566831986951. Retrieved from http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2055668319869517
  32. Wigg, J. M. (2010). Liberating the wanderers: using technology to unlock doors for those living with dementia. Sociology of Health & Illness, 32(2), 288–303. Retrieved from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-9566.2009.01221.x
  33. Winance, M. (2010). Care and disability Practices of experimenting, tinkering with, and arranging people and technical aids. In A. Mol, I. Moser, & J. Pols (Eds.), On Tinkering in Clinics, Homes and Farms (pp. 93–118). transcript Verlag. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1515/transcript.9783839414477.93
  34. Woolford, M., Weller, C., & Ibrahim, J. (2017). Unexplained Absences and Risk of Death and Injury Among Nursing Home Residents: A Systematic Review. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 18.